Thrombogenic Risk Assessment of Transcatheter Prosthetic Heart Valves Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach

Abstract

Background and Objective

Prosthetic heart valve interventions such as TAVR have surged over the past decade, but the associated complication of long-term, life-threatening thrombotic events continues to undermine patient outcomes. Thus, improving thrombogenic risk analysis of TAVR devices is crucial. In vitro studies for thrombogenicity are typically difficult to perform. However, revised ISO testing standards include computational testing for thrombogenic risk assessment of cardiovascular implants. We present a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach for assessing thrombogenic risk of transcatheter aortic valves.

Methods

An FSI framework was implemented via the incompressible computational fluid dynamics multi-physics solver of the ANSYS LS-DYNA software. The numerical modeling approach for flow analysis was validated by comparing the derived flow rate of the 29 mm CoreValve device from benchtop testing and orifice areas of commercial TAVR valves in the literature to in silico results. Thrombogenic risk was analyzed by computing stress accumulation (SA) on virtual platelets seeded in the flow fields via ANSYS EnSight. The integrated FSI-thrombogenicity methodology was subsequently employed to examine hemodynamics and thrombogenic risk of TAVR devices with two approaches: 1) engineering optimization and 2) clinical assessment.

Results

Simulated effective orifice areas for commercial valves were in reported ranges. In silico cardiac output and flow rate during the positive pressure differential period matched experimental results by approximately 93 %. The approach was used to analyze the effect of various TAVR leaflet designs on hemodynamics, where platelets experienced instantaneous stresses reaching around 10 Pa. Post-TAVR deployment hemodynamics in patient-specific bicuspid aortic valve anatomies revealed varying degrees of thrombogenic risk with the highest median SA around 70 dyn·s/cm² - nearly double the activation threshold - despite those being clinically classified as “mild” paravalvular leaks.

Conclusions

Our methodology can be used to improve the thromboresistance of prosthetic valves from the initial design stage to the clinic. It allows for unparalleled optimization of devices, uncovering key TAVR leaflet design parameters that can be used to mitigate thrombogenic risk, in addition to patient-specific modeling to evaluate device performance. This work demonstrates the utility of advanced in silico analysis of TAVR devices that can be utilized for thrombogenic risk assessment of other blood recirculating devices.