Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Tumor Treating Fields Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mengwei Zhang, Ping Yue, Yuanying Feng, Yuan Gao, Chao Sun, Peng Chen
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Tumor Treating Fields Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Metastatic Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Mengwei Zhang, Ping Yue, Yuanying Feng, Yuan Gao, Chao Sun, Peng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The LUNAR clinical trial revealed that incorporating Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy alongside immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) significantly prolonged the overall survival of patients with metastatic, platinum-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the cost of TTFields therapy is high and may further increase the financial burden for patients. Our research aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TTFields therapy addition with ICI for metastatic NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We constructed a Markov model to evaluate the healthcare costs associated with TTFields therapy combined with ICI for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. In this model, the clinical data utilized came from the LUNAR trial, while drug costs and health state utility values were extracted from public databases and relevant scholarly publications. The major outcomes incorporated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with ICI therapy alone, ICI combination with TTFields therapy resulted in 0.42 QALYs at the cost of $167,329, with an ICER of $398,402.38 per year. The calculated ICER surpassed the generally accepted US willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 150,000 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the utility of progression disease is the most influential factor, followed by the cost of TTFields therapy, the utility of progression-free survival, the cost of ICI, and the cost of adverse events in TTFields therapy combined with ICI. Only when the cost of TTFields therapy is reduced by approximately 80.48%, it would be cost-effective within the commonly accepted WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the US WTP, the combination of TTFields therapy with ICI does not currently represent a cost-effective strategy for metastatic NSCLC followed progression on platinum-resistant therapy. Considering its promising clinical outcomes for metastatic NSCLC, it is necessary to control the expenses of this therapeutic strategy in future applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.09.022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The LUNAR clinical trial revealed that incorporating Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy alongside immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) significantly prolonged the overall survival of patients with metastatic, platinum-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the cost of TTFields therapy is high and may further increase the financial burden for patients. Our research aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TTFields therapy addition with ICI for metastatic NSCLC.

Methods: We constructed a Markov model to evaluate the healthcare costs associated with TTFields therapy combined with ICI for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. In this model, the clinical data utilized came from the LUNAR trial, while drug costs and health state utility values were extracted from public databases and relevant scholarly publications. The major outcomes incorporated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results: Compared with ICI therapy alone, ICI combination with TTFields therapy resulted in 0.42 QALYs at the cost of $167,329, with an ICER of $398,402.38 per year. The calculated ICER surpassed the generally accepted US willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 150,000 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the utility of progression disease is the most influential factor, followed by the cost of TTFields therapy, the utility of progression-free survival, the cost of ICI, and the cost of adverse events in TTFields therapy combined with ICI. Only when the cost of TTFields therapy is reduced by approximately 80.48%, it would be cost-effective within the commonly accepted WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY.

Conclusions: According to the US WTP, the combination of TTFields therapy with ICI does not currently represent a cost-effective strategy for metastatic NSCLC followed progression on platinum-resistant therapy. Considering its promising clinical outcomes for metastatic NSCLC, it is necessary to control the expenses of this therapeutic strategy in future applications.

肿瘤治疗场疗法联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析
背景LUNAR临床试验显示,将肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)疗法与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)结合使用,可显著延长铂耐药转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的总生存期。然而,TTFields疗法的成本较高,可能会进一步加重患者的经济负担。我们的研究旨在评估TTFields疗法联合ICI治疗转移性NSCLC的成本效益:我们构建了一个马尔可夫模型,以评估 TTFields 疗法与 ICI 联合治疗晚期 NSCLC 的相关医疗成本。在该模型中,使用的临床数据来自 LUNAR 试验,而药物成本和健康状态效用值则来自公共数据库和相关学术出版物。主要结果包括成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效益比(ICER):结果:与单独使用 ICI 治疗相比,ICI 联合 TTFields 治疗的 QALYs 为 0.42,成本为 167,329 美元,ICER 为每年 398,402.38 美元。计算得出的 ICER 超过了美国普遍接受的每 QALY 15 万美元的支付意愿 (WTP) 门槛。单向敏感性分析表明,疾病进展的效用是影响最大的因素,其次是TTFields疗法的成本、无进展生存期的效用、ICI的成本以及TTFields疗法与ICI联合治疗中不良事件的成本。只有当TTFields疗法的成本降低约80.48%时,在公认的WTP阈值150,000美元/QALY范围内才具有成本效益:根据美国的 WTP,对于铂耐药治疗进展后的转移性 NSCLC,TTFields 疗法与 ICI 的联合治疗目前并不是一种具有成本效益的策略。考虑到其对转移性 NSCLC 有着良好的临床疗效,有必要在未来的应用中控制这一治疗策略的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信