Longitudinal mediation analysis with multilevel and latent growth models: a separable effects causal approach.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chiara Di Maria, Vanessa Didelez
{"title":"Longitudinal mediation analysis with multilevel and latent growth models: a separable effects causal approach.","authors":"Chiara Di Maria, Vanessa Didelez","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02358-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Causal mediation analysis is widespread in applied medical research, especially in longitudinal settings. However, estimating natural mediational effects in such contexts is often difficult because of the presence of post-treatment confounding. Moreover, many models frequently used in applied research, like multilevel and latent growth models, present an additional difficulty, i.e. the presence of latent variables. In this paper, we propose a causal interpretation of these two classes of models based on a novel type of causal effects called separable, which overcome some of the issues of natural effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We formally derive conditions for the identifiability of separable mediational effects and their analytical expressions based on the g-formula. We carry out a simulation study to investigate how moderate and severe model misspecification, as well as violation of the identfiability assumptions, affect estimates. We also present an application to real data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show how model misspecification impacts the estimates of mediational effects, particularly in the case of severe misspecification, and that the bias worsens over time. The violation of assumptions affects separable effect estimates in a very different way for the mixed effect and the latent growth models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our approach allows us to give multilevel and latent growth models an appealing causal interpretation based on separable effects. The simulation study shows that model misspecification can heavily impact effect estimates, highlighting the importance of careful model choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02358-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Causal mediation analysis is widespread in applied medical research, especially in longitudinal settings. However, estimating natural mediational effects in such contexts is often difficult because of the presence of post-treatment confounding. Moreover, many models frequently used in applied research, like multilevel and latent growth models, present an additional difficulty, i.e. the presence of latent variables. In this paper, we propose a causal interpretation of these two classes of models based on a novel type of causal effects called separable, which overcome some of the issues of natural effects.

Methods: We formally derive conditions for the identifiability of separable mediational effects and their analytical expressions based on the g-formula. We carry out a simulation study to investigate how moderate and severe model misspecification, as well as violation of the identfiability assumptions, affect estimates. We also present an application to real data.

Results: The results show how model misspecification impacts the estimates of mediational effects, particularly in the case of severe misspecification, and that the bias worsens over time. The violation of assumptions affects separable effect estimates in a very different way for the mixed effect and the latent growth models.

Conclusion: Our approach allows us to give multilevel and latent growth models an appealing causal interpretation based on separable effects. The simulation study shows that model misspecification can heavily impact effect estimates, highlighting the importance of careful model choice.

利用多层次和潜在增长模型进行纵向中介分析:可分离效应因果方法。
背景:因果中介分析在应用医学研究中非常普遍,尤其是在纵向研究中。然而,由于存在治疗后混杂因素,在这种情况下估计自然中介效应往往比较困难。此外,应用研究中经常使用的许多模型,如多层次模型和潜在增长模型,还存在一个额外的困难,即潜在变量的存在。在本文中,我们基于一种称为可分离的新型因果效应,提出了对这两类模型的因果解释,从而克服了自然效应的一些问题:方法:我们正式推导了可分离中介效应的可识别性条件及其基于 g 公式的分析表达式。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以探讨中度和重度模型错误规范以及违反可识别性假设对估计值的影响。我们还介绍了在真实数据中的应用:结果表明,模型失当会影响中介效应的估计值,尤其是在严重失当的情况下,而且偏差会随着时间的推移而加剧。对于混合效应模型和潜在增长模型来说,违反假设对可分离效应估计值的影响是截然不同的:我们的研究方法使我们能够基于可分离效应对多层次模型和潜在增长模型进行有吸引力的因果解释。模拟研究表明,模型规范错误会严重影响效应估计值,这凸显了谨慎选择模型的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信