Limited Biomarker Potential for IgG Autoantibodies Reactive to Linear Epitopes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Spondyloarthropathy.

IF 3 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Antibodies Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.3390/antib13040087
S Janna Bashar, Zihao Zheng, Aisha M Mergaert, Ryan R Adyniec, Srishti Gupta, Maya F Amjadi, Sara S McCoy, Michael A Newton, Miriam A Shelef
{"title":"Limited Biomarker Potential for IgG Autoantibodies Reactive to Linear Epitopes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Spondyloarthropathy.","authors":"S Janna Bashar, Zihao Zheng, Aisha M Mergaert, Ryan R Adyniec, Srishti Gupta, Maya F Amjadi, Sara S McCoy, Michael A Newton, Miriam A Shelef","doi":"10.3390/antib13040087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autoantibodies are commonly used as biomarkers in autoimmune diseases, but there are limitations. For example, autoantibody biomarkers have poor sensitivity or specificity in systemic lupus erythematosus and do not exist in the spondyloarthropathies, impairing diagnosis and treatment. While autoantibodies suitable for strong biomarkers may not exist in these conditions, another possibility is that technology has limited their discovery. The purpose of this study was to use a novel high-density peptide array that enables the evaluation of IgG binding to every possible linear antigen in the entire human peptidome, as well as a novel machine learning approach that incorporates ELISA validation predictability in order to discover autoantibodies that could be developed into sensitive and specific markers of lupus or spondyloarthropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a peptide array containing the human peptidome, several viral peptidomes, and key post-translational modifications (6 million peptides) to quantify IgG binding in lupus, spondyloarthropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's disease, and control sera. Using ELISA data for 70 peptides, we performed a random forest analysis that evaluated multiple array features to predict which peptides might be good biomarkers, as confirmed by ELISA. We validated the peptide prediction methodology in rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19, conditions for which the antibody repertoire is well-understood, and then evaluated IgG binding by ELISA to peptides that we predicted would be highly bound specifically in lupus or spondyloarthropathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our methodology performed well in validation studies, but peptides predicted to be highly and specifically bound in lupus or spondyloarthropathy could not be confirmed by ELISA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a comprehensive evaluation of the entire human peptidome, highly sensitive and specific IgG autoantibodies were not identified in lupus or spondyloarthropathy. Thus, the pathogenesis of lupus and spondyloarthropathy may not depend upon unique autoantigens, and other types of molecules should be sought as optimal biomarkers in these conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8188,"journal":{"name":"Antibodies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibodies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antib13040087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autoantibodies are commonly used as biomarkers in autoimmune diseases, but there are limitations. For example, autoantibody biomarkers have poor sensitivity or specificity in systemic lupus erythematosus and do not exist in the spondyloarthropathies, impairing diagnosis and treatment. While autoantibodies suitable for strong biomarkers may not exist in these conditions, another possibility is that technology has limited their discovery. The purpose of this study was to use a novel high-density peptide array that enables the evaluation of IgG binding to every possible linear antigen in the entire human peptidome, as well as a novel machine learning approach that incorporates ELISA validation predictability in order to discover autoantibodies that could be developed into sensitive and specific markers of lupus or spondyloarthropathy.

Methods: We used a peptide array containing the human peptidome, several viral peptidomes, and key post-translational modifications (6 million peptides) to quantify IgG binding in lupus, spondyloarthropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's disease, and control sera. Using ELISA data for 70 peptides, we performed a random forest analysis that evaluated multiple array features to predict which peptides might be good biomarkers, as confirmed by ELISA. We validated the peptide prediction methodology in rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19, conditions for which the antibody repertoire is well-understood, and then evaluated IgG binding by ELISA to peptides that we predicted would be highly bound specifically in lupus or spondyloarthropathy.

Results: Our methodology performed well in validation studies, but peptides predicted to be highly and specifically bound in lupus or spondyloarthropathy could not be confirmed by ELISA.

Conclusions: In a comprehensive evaluation of the entire human peptidome, highly sensitive and specific IgG autoantibodies were not identified in lupus or spondyloarthropathy. Thus, the pathogenesis of lupus and spondyloarthropathy may not depend upon unique autoantigens, and other types of molecules should be sought as optimal biomarkers in these conditions.

与系统性红斑狼疮或脊柱关节病中的线性表位发生反应的IgG自身抗体的生物标记潜力有限。
背景:自身抗体通常被用作自身免疫性疾病的生物标志物,但也存在局限性。例如,自身抗体生物标志物在系统性红斑狼疮中的敏感性或特异性较差,在脊柱关节病中也不存在,从而影响了诊断和治疗。虽然在这些疾病中可能不存在适合作为强生物标志物的自身抗体,但另一种可能是技术限制了它们的发现。本研究的目的是使用一种新型高密度肽阵列(可评估IgG与整个人类肽组中每一种可能的线性抗原的结合情况)以及一种新型机器学习方法(结合了ELISA验证的可预测性)来发现可开发为狼疮或脊柱关节病的灵敏特异标记物的自身抗体:我们使用包含人类肽体、几种病毒肽体和关键翻译后修饰(600 万肽)的肽阵列来量化狼疮、脊柱关节病、类风湿性关节炎、斯约格伦病和对照血清中的 IgG 结合。利用 70 种肽的 ELISA 数据,我们进行了随机森林分析,评估了多个阵列特征,以预测哪些肽可能是经 ELISA 证实的良好生物标记物。我们在类风湿性关节炎和 COVID-19 中验证了肽预测方法,这些病症的抗体复合物已被充分了解,然后我们通过 ELISA 评估了 IgG 与肽的结合情况,我们预测这些肽在红斑狼疮或脊柱关节病中具有高度特异性结合:我们的方法在验证研究中表现良好,但预测与狼疮或脊柱关节病高度特异性结合的肽却无法通过 ELISA 证实:结论:在对整个人类肽组的全面评估中,红斑狼疮或脊柱关节病未发现高度敏感和特异的IgG自身抗体。因此,红斑狼疮和脊柱关节病的发病机制可能并不依赖于独特的自身抗原,应该寻找其他类型的分子作为这些疾病的最佳生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibodies
Antibodies IMMUNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibodies (ISSN 2073-4468), an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to antibodies and antigens. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure - if unable to be published in a normal way - can be deposited as supplementary material. This journal covers all topics related to antibodies and antigens, topics of interest include (but are not limited to): antibody-producing cells (including B cells), antibody structure and function, antibody-antigen interactions, Fc receptors, antibody manufacturing antibody engineering, antibody therapy, immunoassays, antibody diagnosis, tissue antigens, exogenous antigens, endogenous antigens, autoantigens, monoclonal antibodies, natural antibodies, humoral immune responses, immunoregulatory molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信