Intensification of upfront chemotherapy for patients with myeloid blast phase CML: a single center experience.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Benjamin J Lee, Shawn P Griffin, Jean Doh, Stefan O Ciurea, Deepa Jeyakumar, Piyanuch Kongtim, Kiran Naqvi
{"title":"Intensification of upfront chemotherapy for patients with myeloid blast phase CML: a single center experience.","authors":"Benjamin J Lee, Shawn P Griffin, Jean Doh, Stefan O Ciurea, Deepa Jeyakumar, Piyanuch Kongtim, Kiran Naqvi","doi":"10.1007/s00277-024-06045-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outcomes for patients with myeloid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-MBP) are dismal, and no preferred chemotherapy regimen has been identified. Recent studies have suggested a higher response rate with administration of timed-sequenced regimens (TSR) (purine analog, high-dose cytarabine, anthracycline) in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of newly diagnosed CML-MBP patients consecutively treated at our institution with a TSR or standard-dose cytarabine and an anthracycline (\"7 + 3\") combined with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) between 2011 and 2023. Endpoints of interest included hematologic response, clinically significant cytogenetic response (CSCR) defined as achieving at least a minor cytogenetic response (Ph + metaphases 0%-≤65%) after induction therapy, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 18 patients with CML-MBP were included of whom 9 (50%) received a TSR and 9 (50%) received \"7 + 3\". Hematologic response (55.6% vs. 55.6%) and CSCR (25% vs. 37.5%) were similar between TSR- and \"7 + 3\" treated patients. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic, end-organ toxicity with 33.3% and 11.1% of TSR- and 7 + 3-treated patients, respectively, experiencing at least two. Our data suggests that intensification of upfront chemotherapy does not appear to improve treatment outcomes in CML-MBP patients however, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings involving a larger cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06045-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outcomes for patients with myeloid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-MBP) are dismal, and no preferred chemotherapy regimen has been identified. Recent studies have suggested a higher response rate with administration of timed-sequenced regimens (TSR) (purine analog, high-dose cytarabine, anthracycline) in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of newly diagnosed CML-MBP patients consecutively treated at our institution with a TSR or standard-dose cytarabine and an anthracycline ("7 + 3") combined with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) between 2011 and 2023. Endpoints of interest included hematologic response, clinically significant cytogenetic response (CSCR) defined as achieving at least a minor cytogenetic response (Ph + metaphases 0%-≤65%) after induction therapy, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 18 patients with CML-MBP were included of whom 9 (50%) received a TSR and 9 (50%) received "7 + 3". Hematologic response (55.6% vs. 55.6%) and CSCR (25% vs. 37.5%) were similar between TSR- and "7 + 3" treated patients. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic, end-organ toxicity with 33.3% and 11.1% of TSR- and 7 + 3-treated patients, respectively, experiencing at least two. Our data suggests that intensification of upfront chemotherapy does not appear to improve treatment outcomes in CML-MBP patients however, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings involving a larger cohort.

对骨髓增生期 CML 患者加强前期化疗:单中心经验。
髓性鼓泡期慢性髓性白血病(CML-MBP)患者的疗效令人沮丧,目前尚未确定首选化疗方案。最近的研究表明,对高危急性髓性白血病患者采用定时序贯疗法(TSR)(嘌呤类似物、大剂量阿糖胞苷、蒽环类药物)的反应率更高。我们回顾性评估了 2011 年至 2023 年期间在本院接受 TSR 或标准剂量阿糖胞苷和蒽环类药物("7 + 3")联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 连续治疗的新诊断 CML-MBP 患者的疗效。研究终点包括血液学反应、有临床意义的细胞遗传学反应(CSCR),即诱导治疗后至少达到轻微细胞遗传学反应(Ph + metaphases 0%-≤65%)、无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)。共纳入了 18 名 CML-MBP 患者,其中 9 人(50%)获得了 TSR,9 人(50%)获得了 "7 + 3"。接受TSR和 "7 + 3 "治疗的患者的血液学反应(55.6% vs. 55.6%)和CSCR(25% vs. 37.5%)相似。12名患者(66.7%)至少出现了一次≥3级的非血液学、内脏器官毒性,其中33.3%的TSR治疗患者和11.1%的 "7 + 3 "治疗患者至少出现了两次毒性。我们的数据表明,加强前期化疗似乎并不能改善 CML-MBP 患者的治疗效果,但还需要更多的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信