Use of E-Cigarette, Traditional Cigarettes, and C-Reactive Protein: The Cross Cohort Collaboration.

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.012

Zhiqi Yao, Erfan Tasdighi, Zeina A Dardari, John Erhabor, Kunal K Jha, Ngozi Osuji, Tanuja Rajan, Ellen Boakye, Carlos J Rodriguez, Joao A C Lima, Suzanne Judd, Theodore Feldman, Jonathan A Fialkow, Vasan S Ramachandran, Omar El Shahawy, Emelia J Benjamin, Aruni Bhatnagar, Andrew P DeFilippis, Khurram Nasir, Michael J Blaha

{"title":"Use of E-Cigarette, Traditional Cigarettes, and C-Reactive Protein: The Cross Cohort Collaboration.","authors":"Zhiqi Yao, Erfan Tasdighi, Zeina A Dardari, John Erhabor, Kunal K Jha, Ngozi Osuji, Tanuja Rajan, Ellen Boakye, Carlos J Rodriguez, Joao A C Lima, Suzanne Judd, Theodore Feldman, Jonathan A Fialkow, Vasan S Ramachandran, Omar El Shahawy, Emelia J Benjamin, Aruni Bhatnagar, Andrew P DeFilippis, Khurram Nasir, Michael J Blaha","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study included 18,797 participants from six longitudinal cohorts (CARDIA, FHS Gen III, HCHS/SOL, MESA, MiHeart, and REGARDS). 5,806 of them were with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) measurements. We found that among exclusive electronic cigarette (EC) use was associated with significantly lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels compared to exclusive combustible cigarette use, suggesting a potentially lower inflammatory burden. hs-CRP levels in dual users and former smokers currently using EC were comparable to those observed in exclusive cigarette smokers. In contrast, individuals who exclusively used ECs showed no significant difference in hs-CRP levels compared to never smokers. These findings have important implications for tobacco regulation, public health, and clinical practice, highlighting the need for continued monitoring of EC-related health impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study included 18,797 participants from six longitudinal cohorts (CARDIA, FHS Gen III, HCHS/SOL, MESA, MiHeart, and REGARDS). 5,806 of them were with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) measurements. We found that among exclusive electronic cigarette (EC) use was associated with significantly lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels compared to exclusive combustible cigarette use, suggesting a potentially lower inflammatory burden. hs-CRP levels in dual users and former smokers currently using EC were comparable to those observed in exclusive cigarette smokers. In contrast, individuals who exclusively used ECs showed no significant difference in hs-CRP levels compared to never smokers. These findings have important implications for tobacco regulation, public health, and clinical practice, highlighting the need for continued monitoring of EC-related health impacts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用电子烟、传统香烟与 C 反应蛋白：交叉队列协作。

这项横断面研究包括来自六个纵向队列（CARDIA、FHS Gen III、HCHS/SOL、MESA、MiHeart 和 REGARDS）的 18,797 名参与者。其中 5806 人进行了高敏 C 反应蛋白（hs-CRP）测量。我们发现，与只使用可燃卷烟相比，只使用电子烟（EC）的人的高敏C反应蛋白（hs-CRP）水平明显较低，这表明其炎症负担可能较低。与此相反，只使用电子烟的人与从不吸烟的人相比，hs-CRP水平没有明显差异。这些研究结果对烟草监管、公共卫生和临床实践具有重要意义，强调了持续监测与EC相关的健康影响的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American heart journal 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

8.20

自引率

2.10%

发文量

214

审稿时长

38 days

期刊介绍： The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.