{"title":"Superior trunk versus interscalene brachial plexus block in humerus surgery: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Chandni Sinha, Poonam Kumari, Ajeet Kumar, Amarjeet Kumar, Abhyuday Kumar, Ditipriya Bhar, Arun S K, Chethan Vamshi","doi":"10.5114/ait.2024.142772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound (US)-guided interscalene (IS) block is a commonly performed block for shoulder and humerus surgery. Though it provides excellent analgesia, it is associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and dyspnoea. Superior trunk (ST) block has been described, wherein the local anaesthetic is deposited around the ST block (formed by fusion of C5 and C6 nerve roots). This study aimed to determine whether ST block provides similar analgesic efficacy with lower incidence of diaphragmatic paresis in patients undergoing proximal humerus surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 62 patients scheduled to undergo unilateral internal fixation (plating) for proximal or mid shaft humerus fracture were randomised to 2 groups. Patients in group I received US-guided ST block while those in group II received US-guided IS block. Both groups received 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. Diaphragmatic excursion was noted at baseline and after 30 minutes after the block. Postoperatively, the numerical rating scale score and requirement of opioids were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of complete/incomplete paresis was statistically significantly lower in the ST group. Thirty eight percent of the patients (11) had complete paresis in the IS group, compared to none in the ST group. Partial paresis was observed in 62% of patients in the IS block group and 19% in the ST block group ( P < 0.001). The percentage reduction of movement was significantly higher in the IS group vs. the ST group ( P < 0.001). There was no difference in pain scores or the amount of opioid consumption between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ST block provides similar analgesia to IS block for proximal/mid humerus surgery with better preservation of diaphragmatic function. This could be a viable alternative in patients with compromised respiratory functions scheduled for such surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"56 3","pages":"194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2024.142772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound (US)-guided interscalene (IS) block is a commonly performed block for shoulder and humerus surgery. Though it provides excellent analgesia, it is associated with hemidiaphragmatic paralysis and dyspnoea. Superior trunk (ST) block has been described, wherein the local anaesthetic is deposited around the ST block (formed by fusion of C5 and C6 nerve roots). This study aimed to determine whether ST block provides similar analgesic efficacy with lower incidence of diaphragmatic paresis in patients undergoing proximal humerus surgery.
Material and methods: A total of 62 patients scheduled to undergo unilateral internal fixation (plating) for proximal or mid shaft humerus fracture were randomised to 2 groups. Patients in group I received US-guided ST block while those in group II received US-guided IS block. Both groups received 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. Diaphragmatic excursion was noted at baseline and after 30 minutes after the block. Postoperatively, the numerical rating scale score and requirement of opioids were documented.
Results: The incidence of complete/incomplete paresis was statistically significantly lower in the ST group. Thirty eight percent of the patients (11) had complete paresis in the IS group, compared to none in the ST group. Partial paresis was observed in 62% of patients in the IS block group and 19% in the ST block group ( P < 0.001). The percentage reduction of movement was significantly higher in the IS group vs. the ST group ( P < 0.001). There was no difference in pain scores or the amount of opioid consumption between groups.
Conclusions: ST block provides similar analgesia to IS block for proximal/mid humerus surgery with better preservation of diaphragmatic function. This could be a viable alternative in patients with compromised respiratory functions scheduled for such surgery.
导言:超声(US)引导下的椎间孔阻滞(IS)是肩部和肱骨手术中常用的阻滞方法。虽然它能提供极佳的镇痛效果,但会引起半膈麻痹和呼吸困难。上躯干(ST)阻滞已被描述,即局部麻醉剂沉积在ST阻滞周围(由C5和C6神经根融合形成)。本研究旨在确定 ST 阻滞是否能为接受肱骨近端手术的患者提供类似的镇痛效果,同时降低膈肌麻痹的发生率:将62名计划接受单侧肱骨近端或中轴骨折内固定术(钢板固定术)的患者随机分为两组。I 组患者接受 US 引导下的 ST 阻滞,II 组患者接受 US 引导下的 IS 阻滞。两组患者都接受了 15 毫升 0.5% 布比卡因。在基线时和阻滞后 30 分钟后观察横膈膜的偏移。术后记录了数字评分量表得分和阿片类药物的需求量:结果:ST 组完全/不完全瘫痪的发生率在统计学上明显较低。在 IS 组中,38% 的患者(11 人)出现完全瘫痪,而在 ST 组中则没有。IS 阻滞组 62% 的患者出现部分瘫痪,ST 阻滞组为 19% (P < 0.001)。与 ST 阻滞组相比,IS 阻滞组患者活动减少的百分比明显更高(P < 0.001)。两组的疼痛评分和阿片类药物用量没有差异:结论:在肱骨近端/中段手术中,ST阻滞的镇痛效果与IS阻滞相似,但能更好地保留膈肌功能。对于计划接受此类手术的呼吸功能受损患者来说,这可能是一个可行的替代方案。