Economic and environmental pollutant impact of Maternal-Fetal Telemedicine.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Valeria Mariana Li Valverde, Elizabeth Althaus, Lauren Horton, Mauricio La Rosa, Sina Haeri
{"title":"Economic and environmental pollutant impact of Maternal-Fetal Telemedicine.","authors":"Valeria Mariana Li Valverde, Elizabeth Althaus, Lauren Horton, Mauricio La Rosa, Sina Haeri","doi":"10.1055/a-2447-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global issue of greenhouse gas emissions has significant implications for the environment and human health. Telemedicine provides a valuable tool for delivering healthcare while reducing gas emissions by limiting the need for patient travel. However, the environmental effects of telemedicine in high-risk pregnancy populations remain unassessed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to estimate the economic and environmental impact of an outpatient teleMFM program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined all visits at 3 teleMFM clinics more than 90 miles away from the nearest in-person MFM office between 10/1/2021 and 6/1/2022. Travel distances and times were calculated for each appointment between the patient's home, telemedicine clinic, and nearest in-person clinics, using zip code data and Google Maps web-based map calculator tools. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if in-person using inflation-adjusted Internal Revenue Service annual standard mileage reimbursement rate ($0.58 per mile), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality's average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger vehicles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period a total number of 2,712 appointments were scheduled, of which 2,454 were kept (cancellations removed) and analyzed. Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes and 118.32 dollars saved per patient visit compared to visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over a 7 month period a total of 96.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the positive economic and environmental impact of teleMFM utilization in communities remote from in-person care. Given the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to climate change, such findings may provide strategies for our specialty make informed policy, advocacy, and business decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2447-0069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global issue of greenhouse gas emissions has significant implications for the environment and human health. Telemedicine provides a valuable tool for delivering healthcare while reducing gas emissions by limiting the need for patient travel. However, the environmental effects of telemedicine in high-risk pregnancy populations remain unassessed.

Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the economic and environmental impact of an outpatient teleMFM program.

Study design: This retrospective cohort study examined all visits at 3 teleMFM clinics more than 90 miles away from the nearest in-person MFM office between 10/1/2021 and 6/1/2022. Travel distances and times were calculated for each appointment between the patient's home, telemedicine clinic, and nearest in-person clinics, using zip code data and Google Maps web-based map calculator tools. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if in-person using inflation-adjusted Internal Revenue Service annual standard mileage reimbursement rate ($0.58 per mile), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality's average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger vehicles.

Results: During the study period a total number of 2,712 appointments were scheduled, of which 2,454 were kept (cancellations removed) and analyzed. Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes and 118.32 dollars saved per patient visit compared to visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over a 7 month period a total of 96.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the positive economic and environmental impact of teleMFM utilization in communities remote from in-person care. Given the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to climate change, such findings may provide strategies for our specialty make informed policy, advocacy, and business decisions.

母胎远程医疗的经济和环境污染影响。
背景:全球温室气体排放问题对环境和人类健康都有重大影响。远程医疗为提供医疗保健服务提供了宝贵的工具,同时通过限制患者的旅行需求减少了气体排放。然而,远程医疗对高危妊娠人群的环境影响仍未得到评估:研究设计:这项回顾性队列研究调查了 2021 年 1 月 10 日至 2022 年 1 月 6 日期间,距离最近的远程妇产科诊所 90 英里以上的 3 家远程妇产科诊所的所有就诊情况。利用邮政编码数据和谷歌地图网络地图计算器工具,计算了患者住所、远程医疗诊所和最近的面对面诊所之间每次预约的旅行距离和时间。通过使用通货膨胀调整后的美国国内税收署年度标准里程报销率(每英里 0.58 美元)和美国环境保护署运输和空气质量办公室的汽油燃料乘用车年平均排放量和燃料消耗量,确定远程医疗预约与亲自就诊所产生的里程报销率和排放量之间的差异,从而计算出节省的旅行成本和对环境的影响:在研究期间,共安排了 2,712 次预约,其中 2,454 次得以保留(取消)并进行了分析。与到最近的诊所就诊相比,到远程移动医疗诊所就诊每次可节省 204 英里、200 分钟和 118.32 美元。在 7 个月的时间里,共减少了 96.6 公吨的排放量:这项研究表明,在远离现场医疗服务的社区使用远程医疗对经济和环境产生了积极影响。考虑到温室气体排放对气候变化的影响,这些研究结果可为我们的专业制定明智的政策、宣传和商业决策提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信