Baillie A Bronner, Monique Holod, Margaret Schermerhorn, Juliana Sung, Anna C Mccormick, Samantha De Los Reyes
{"title":"Association of Borderline Fetal Growth with Progression with Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"Baillie A Bronner, Monique Holod, Margaret Schermerhorn, Juliana Sung, Anna C Mccormick, Samantha De Los Reyes","doi":"10.1055/a-2451-9118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to evaluate if an estimated fetal weight (EFW) between 10 and 15th percentiles at the time of anatomy ultrasound, referred to as borderline fetal growth, is associated with progression to fetal growth restriction (FGR) on subsequent ultrasound, delivery of a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, or neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We performed a secondary analysis using the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMom2b) data. The exposures were normotensive pregnancies with non-anomalous singleton gestations with normal growth, defined as EFW >15th percentile at the anatomy scan compared to borderline fetal growth fetuses defined as those with an EFW in the 10 to 15th percentiles. The primary outcome was FGR at subsequent ultrasound, defined as EFW or AC <10%. The secondary outcomes were NICU admission and SGA neonate. Univariable analyses were performed comparing maternal baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable analysis was performed for the primary outcome with variables adjusted a priori for body mass index, smoking status, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and drug use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In total, 4,883 patients met inclusion criteria with 114 in the borderline fetal growth group and 4,769 in the normal growth group. There were no significant differences in maternal demographic or medical characteristics. In adjusted multivariable analysis, patients with borderline growth had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with FGR at their subsequent scan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.68, confidence interval [CI]: 3.98-11.20) compared to those with normal growth. For secondary outcomes, patients with borderline fetal growth were significantly more likely to have SGA neonates (6.14 vs. 2.67%, <i>p</i> = 0.025). There was no difference in admissions to the NICU between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Diagnosis of borderline fetal growth at the time of the anatomy scan was associated with significantly increased odds of progression to FGR at subsequent scans and delivery of an SGA neonate.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Patients with EFWs between the 10th and 15th percentiles, referred to as borderline fetal growth, are at an increased risk of progression to FGR compared to those with EFWs >15th percentile.. · Patients with borderline fetal growth are more likely to deliver SGA neonates compared to those with EFWs >15th percentile.. · Providers should consider follow-up antenatal growth assessment in patients with borderline fetal growth..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2451-9118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate if an estimated fetal weight (EFW) between 10 and 15th percentiles at the time of anatomy ultrasound, referred to as borderline fetal growth, is associated with progression to fetal growth restriction (FGR) on subsequent ultrasound, delivery of a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, or neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission.
Study design: We performed a secondary analysis using the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMom2b) data. The exposures were normotensive pregnancies with non-anomalous singleton gestations with normal growth, defined as EFW >15th percentile at the anatomy scan compared to borderline fetal growth fetuses defined as those with an EFW in the 10 to 15th percentiles. The primary outcome was FGR at subsequent ultrasound, defined as EFW or AC <10%. The secondary outcomes were NICU admission and SGA neonate. Univariable analyses were performed comparing maternal baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariable analysis was performed for the primary outcome with variables adjusted a priori for body mass index, smoking status, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and drug use.
Results: In total, 4,883 patients met inclusion criteria with 114 in the borderline fetal growth group and 4,769 in the normal growth group. There were no significant differences in maternal demographic or medical characteristics. In adjusted multivariable analysis, patients with borderline growth had significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with FGR at their subsequent scan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.68, confidence interval [CI]: 3.98-11.20) compared to those with normal growth. For secondary outcomes, patients with borderline fetal growth were significantly more likely to have SGA neonates (6.14 vs. 2.67%, p = 0.025). There was no difference in admissions to the NICU between groups.
Conclusion: Diagnosis of borderline fetal growth at the time of the anatomy scan was associated with significantly increased odds of progression to FGR at subsequent scans and delivery of an SGA neonate.
Key points: · Patients with EFWs between the 10th and 15th percentiles, referred to as borderline fetal growth, are at an increased risk of progression to FGR compared to those with EFWs >15th percentile.. · Patients with borderline fetal growth are more likely to deliver SGA neonates compared to those with EFWs >15th percentile.. · Providers should consider follow-up antenatal growth assessment in patients with borderline fetal growth..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.