EEG biomarkers in Alzheimer's and prodromal Alzheimer's: a comprehensive analysis of spectral and connectivity features.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chowtapalle Anuraag Chetty, Harsha Bhardwaj, G Pradeep Kumar, T Devanand, C S Aswin Sekhar, Tuba Aktürk, Ilayda Kiyi, Görsev Yener, Bahar Güntekin, Justin Joseph, Chinnakkaruppan Adaikkan
{"title":"EEG biomarkers in Alzheimer's and prodromal Alzheimer's: a comprehensive analysis of spectral and connectivity features.","authors":"Chowtapalle Anuraag Chetty, Harsha Bhardwaj, G Pradeep Kumar, T Devanand, C S Aswin Sekhar, Tuba Aktürk, Ilayda Kiyi, Görsev Yener, Bahar Güntekin, Justin Joseph, Chinnakkaruppan Adaikkan","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01582-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, or prodromal AD) are highly significant for early diagnosis, clinical trials and treatment outcome evaluations. Electroencephalography (EEG), being noninvasive and easily accessible, has recently been the center of focus. However, a comprehensive understanding of EEG in dementia is still needed. A primary objective of this study is to investigate which of the many EEG characteristics could effectively differentiate between individuals with AD or prodromal AD and healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected resting state EEG data from individuals with AD, prodromal AD, and normal cognition. Two distinct preprocessing pipelines were employed to study the reliability of the extracted measures across different datasets. We extracted 41 different EEG features. We have also developed a stand-alone software application package, Feature Analyzer, as a comprehensive toolbox for EEG analysis. This tool allows users to extract 41 EEG features spanning various domains, including complexity measures, wavelet features, spectral power ratios, and entropy measures. We performed statistical tests to investigate the differences in AD or prodromal AD from age-matched cognitively normal individuals based on the extracted EEG features, power spectral density (PSD), and EEG functional connectivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spectral power ratio measures such as theta/alpha and theta/beta power ratios showed significant differences between cognitively normal and AD individuals. Theta power was higher in AD, suggesting a slowing of oscillations in AD; however, the functional connectivity of the theta band was decreased in AD individuals. In contrast, we observed increased gamma/alpha power ratio, gamma power, and gamma functional connectivity in prodromal AD. Entropy and complexity measures after correcting for multiple electrode comparisons did not show differences in AD or prodromal AD groups. We thus catalogued AD and prodromal AD-specific EEG features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that the changes in power and connectivity in certain frequency bands of EEG differ in prodromal AD and AD. The spectral power, power ratios, and the functional connectivity of theta and gamma could be biomarkers for diagnosis of AD and prodromal AD, measure the treatment outcome, and possibly a target for brain stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":"236"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01582-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, or prodromal AD) are highly significant for early diagnosis, clinical trials and treatment outcome evaluations. Electroencephalography (EEG), being noninvasive and easily accessible, has recently been the center of focus. However, a comprehensive understanding of EEG in dementia is still needed. A primary objective of this study is to investigate which of the many EEG characteristics could effectively differentiate between individuals with AD or prodromal AD and healthy individuals.

Methods: We collected resting state EEG data from individuals with AD, prodromal AD, and normal cognition. Two distinct preprocessing pipelines were employed to study the reliability of the extracted measures across different datasets. We extracted 41 different EEG features. We have also developed a stand-alone software application package, Feature Analyzer, as a comprehensive toolbox for EEG analysis. This tool allows users to extract 41 EEG features spanning various domains, including complexity measures, wavelet features, spectral power ratios, and entropy measures. We performed statistical tests to investigate the differences in AD or prodromal AD from age-matched cognitively normal individuals based on the extracted EEG features, power spectral density (PSD), and EEG functional connectivity.

Results: Spectral power ratio measures such as theta/alpha and theta/beta power ratios showed significant differences between cognitively normal and AD individuals. Theta power was higher in AD, suggesting a slowing of oscillations in AD; however, the functional connectivity of the theta band was decreased in AD individuals. In contrast, we observed increased gamma/alpha power ratio, gamma power, and gamma functional connectivity in prodromal AD. Entropy and complexity measures after correcting for multiple electrode comparisons did not show differences in AD or prodromal AD groups. We thus catalogued AD and prodromal AD-specific EEG features.

Conclusions: Our findings reveal that the changes in power and connectivity in certain frequency bands of EEG differ in prodromal AD and AD. The spectral power, power ratios, and the functional connectivity of theta and gamma could be biomarkers for diagnosis of AD and prodromal AD, measure the treatment outcome, and possibly a target for brain stimulation.

阿尔茨海默氏症和前驱阿尔茨海默氏症的脑电图生物标志物:频谱和连接特征的综合分析。
背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI,或 AD 前驱期)的生物标志物对于早期诊断、临床试验和治疗效果评估意义重大。脑电图(EEG)是一种非侵入性且容易获得的方法,最近已成为关注的焦点。然而,我们仍然需要全面了解痴呆症的脑电图。本研究的主要目的是调查在众多脑电图特征中,哪些特征可以有效区分老年痴呆症患者或老年痴呆症前驱期患者和健康人:我们收集了注意力缺失症患者、注意力缺失症前驱期患者和认知正常者的静息状态脑电图数据。我们采用了两种不同的预处理方法来研究不同数据集中所提取测量值的可靠性。我们提取了 41 种不同的脑电图特征。我们还开发了一个独立的应用软件包 "特征分析器",作为脑电图分析的综合工具箱。该工具允许用户提取 41 种不同领域的脑电图特征,包括复杂度测量、小波特征、频谱功率比和熵测量。我们根据提取的脑电图特征、功率谱密度(PSD)和脑电图功能连接性进行了统计测试,以研究注意力缺失症或注意力缺失症前驱期患者与年龄匹配的认知正常人之间的差异:θ/α和θ/β功率比等频谱功率比测量结果显示,认知正常人和注意力缺失症患者之间存在显著差异。注意力缺失症患者的θ功率更高,这表明注意力缺失症患者的振荡减慢;然而,注意力缺失症患者θ波段的功能连接性降低。与此相反,我们观察到前驱型注意力缺失症患者的伽马/α功率比、伽马功率和伽马功能连接性都有所提高。在对多电极比较进行校正后,熵和复杂性测量在AD组和AD前驱组中未显示出差异。因此,我们对注意力缺失症和注意力缺失症前驱期的脑电图特征进行了分类:我们的研究结果表明,AD前驱期和AD患者脑电图某些频段的功率和连接性变化有所不同。θ和γ的频谱功率、功率比和功能连接性可作为诊断AD和AD前驱期的生物标志物,衡量治疗效果,并可能成为脑刺激的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信