Directing innovation through confrontation and democratisation: the case of platform cooperativism

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2024.2414512

Alejandro Fortuny-Sicart, Mario Pansera, Javier Lloveras

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological innovation can serve a multitude of conflicting and diverse interests, often reflecting prevailing worldviews and ideologies. This article focuses on the shaping of innovation directi...

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过对抗和民主化引导创新：平台合作主义案例

技术创新可以服务于众多相互冲突的不同利益，通常反映了流行的世界观和意识形态。本文重点探讨了创新导向的形成过程。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.