Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Australian Journal of Career Development Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10384162241286227
Kokou A Atitsogbe, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Paboussoum Pari, Jérôme Rossier
{"title":"Toward a conceptualization of decent work in Africa: Development and cross-cultural validation of the Decent Work Triad (DWT) in Burkina Faso, Switzerland, and Togo.","authors":"Kokou A Atitsogbe, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Paboussoum Pari, Jérôme Rossier","doi":"10.1177/10384162241286227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychology of Working theorists recommend supplementing the Decent Work Scale (DWS) with subjective investigations of decent work across different cultural contexts. Building on this, the present study developed and validated the Decent Work Triad (DWT) for assessing the subjective aspects of decent work in a sub-Saharan African context. Using a Burkinabe sample for exploratory (<i>N</i> = 303) and confirmatory (<i>N</i> = 494) analyses, it consists of 8 items assessing three moral and value-based dimensions: Dignity, Corruption-Free, and Shamelessness. The scale showed good psychometric properties and invariance across country and gender in Burkina Faso (<i>N</i> = 494), Switzerland (<i>N</i> = 590), and Togo (<i>N</i> = 812). It also showed incremental validity in predicting work and life satisfaction beyond the DWS and discriminant validity along with constructs of marginalization and economic constraints, underscoring its robustness. The DWT's utility in understanding the subjective and cultural dimensions of decent work and its implications were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44843,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Career Development","volume":"33 3","pages":"254-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Career Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162241286227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychology of Working theorists recommend supplementing the Decent Work Scale (DWS) with subjective investigations of decent work across different cultural contexts. Building on this, the present study developed and validated the Decent Work Triad (DWT) for assessing the subjective aspects of decent work in a sub-Saharan African context. Using a Burkinabe sample for exploratory (N = 303) and confirmatory (N = 494) analyses, it consists of 8 items assessing three moral and value-based dimensions: Dignity, Corruption-Free, and Shamelessness. The scale showed good psychometric properties and invariance across country and gender in Burkina Faso (N = 494), Switzerland (N = 590), and Togo (N = 812). It also showed incremental validity in predicting work and life satisfaction beyond the DWS and discriminant validity along with constructs of marginalization and economic constraints, underscoring its robustness. The DWT's utility in understanding the subjective and cultural dimensions of decent work and its implications were discussed.

实现非洲体面工作的概念化:在布基纳法索、瑞士和多哥发展和跨文化验证体面工作三要素(DWT)。
工作心理学理论家建议,在体面工作量表(DWS)的基础上,对不同文化背景下的体面工作进行主观调查。在此基础上,本研究开发并验证了体面工作三要素(DWT),用于评估撒哈拉以南非洲地区体面工作的主观方面。通过对布基纳法索样本进行探索性分析(N = 303)和确认性分析(N = 494),该问卷由 8 个项目组成,分别评估三个基于道德和价值的维度:尊严、廉洁和无耻。在布基纳法索(N = 494)、瑞士(N = 590)和多哥(N = 812),该量表显示出良好的心理测量特性和跨国家、跨性别的不变性。在预测工作和生活满意度方面,DWT 也显示出超越 DWS 的增量有效性,以及与边缘化和经济制约因素相关的判别有效性,这突出表明了 DWT 的稳健性。会议讨论了 DWT 在了解体面工作的主观和文化层面的实用性及其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信