Variability in pediatric and neonatal organ offering, acceptance and utilization: a survey of Canadian pediatric transplant programs and organ donation organizations.

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2024.1458563
Laurie A Lee, Augustina Okpere, Dori-Ann Martin, Meagan Mahoney, Lee James, Yaron Avitzur, Bailey Piggott, Christopher Tomlinson, Simon Urschel, Lorraine Hamiwka
{"title":"Variability in pediatric and neonatal organ offering, acceptance and utilization: a survey of Canadian pediatric transplant programs and organ donation organizations.","authors":"Laurie A Lee, Augustina Okpere, Dori-Ann Martin, Meagan Mahoney, Lee James, Yaron Avitzur, Bailey Piggott, Christopher Tomlinson, Simon Urschel, Lorraine Hamiwka","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1458563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Solid organ transplantation in children is a lifesaving therapy, however, pediatric organ donation rates remain suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Canadian organ donation organizations (ODOs) and pediatric transplant programs (TPs), aiming to describe policies and practices for pediatric organ allocation, acceptance, and utilization in Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates were 82% and 83% respectively for ODOs and transplant programs comprising 7 kidney, 3 heart, 2 lung, 2 liver and 1 intestine programs. All 9 ODOs reported offering pediatric organs following death by neurological criteria (DNC), while 8 reported offering organs following death by circulatory criteria (DCC) for some organs. Variability was found across ODOs and TPs. There was little agreement on both absolute and organ-specific donor exclusion criteria between ODOs. There was further disagreement in organ specific acceptance criteria between ODOs and TPs and between TPs themselves. Notably, despite the development of pediatric donation after DCC guidelines, organs from DCC donors are excluded by many ODOs and TPs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Further variability in pediatric specific training, policies, and allocation guidelines are also documented. Significant areas for improvement in standardization in organ acceptance, offering, and allocation in pediatric donation and transplantation across Canada were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":"3 ","pages":"1458563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1458563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Solid organ transplantation in children is a lifesaving therapy, however, pediatric organ donation rates remain suboptimal.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Canadian organ donation organizations (ODOs) and pediatric transplant programs (TPs), aiming to describe policies and practices for pediatric organ allocation, acceptance, and utilization in Canada.

Results: Response rates were 82% and 83% respectively for ODOs and transplant programs comprising 7 kidney, 3 heart, 2 lung, 2 liver and 1 intestine programs. All 9 ODOs reported offering pediatric organs following death by neurological criteria (DNC), while 8 reported offering organs following death by circulatory criteria (DCC) for some organs. Variability was found across ODOs and TPs. There was little agreement on both absolute and organ-specific donor exclusion criteria between ODOs. There was further disagreement in organ specific acceptance criteria between ODOs and TPs and between TPs themselves. Notably, despite the development of pediatric donation after DCC guidelines, organs from DCC donors are excluded by many ODOs and TPs.

Discussion: Further variability in pediatric specific training, policies, and allocation guidelines are also documented. Significant areas for improvement in standardization in organ acceptance, offering, and allocation in pediatric donation and transplantation across Canada were identified.

儿科和新生儿器官提供、接受和利用的差异:加拿大儿科移植计划和器官捐献组织调查。
导言:儿童实体器官移植是一种挽救生命的疗法,然而,儿科器官捐献率仍不理想:我们对加拿大器官捐献组织(ODOs)和儿科移植项目(TPs)进行了横向调查,旨在了解加拿大儿科器官分配、接受和使用的政策和实践:器官捐献组织和移植项目的回复率分别为82%和83%,其中包括7个肾脏、3个心脏、2个肺脏、2个肝脏和1个肠道项目。所有 9 个开放器官组织都报告称,在按照神经系统标准(DNC)死亡后提供儿科器官,而 8 个开放器官组织报告称,在按照循环系统标准(DCC)死亡后提供某些器官。各 ODO 和 TP 之间存在差异。在绝对标准和特定器官捐献者排除标准方面,ODO 之间几乎没有达成一致。ODO和TP之间以及TP本身之间在器官特定接受标准方面也存在分歧。值得注意的是,尽管制定了儿科捐献DCC后的指导方针,但许多ODO和TPs仍将DCC捐献者的器官排除在外:讨论:儿科特定培训、政策和分配指南的进一步差异也被记录在案。在加拿大,儿科捐献和移植中的器官接受、提供和分配标准化方面有许多需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信