{"title":"Primary delayed sternal closure in adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review of protocols.","authors":"Hannah L McMullen, David Blitzer, Hannah Copeland","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13024-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary delayed sternal closure (DSC) is a useful tool in the management of certain critically unstable patients after cardiac surgery, but there is a paucity of consensus management guidelines. This review aimed to identify critical key areas in DSC management.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Systematic literature search was conducted in January 2023 and performed using Embase and PubMed. For original research articles were included that described outcomes and/or protocols for primary adult DSC patients, excluding articles on pediatric patients and secondary DSC.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Eleven retrospective review original articles examined protocols for adult patients undergoing DSC. Hemodynamic instability and uncontrolled bleeding/coagulopathy were the two most common indications. Time to chest closure ranged 22 hours - 8.7 days. A range of dressings were employed, including Esmark and VAC dressings, with about half of authors not disclosing details. VAC was endorsed by several authors specifically for management of uncontrolled hemorrhage/coagulopathy. There was no consensus regarding irrigation solution for mediastinal prepping, with or without antibiotic solution. There was a lack of consensus on antibiotic selection and duration, varying from 2 and 3 multidrug regimens of broad-spectrum antibiotics, with/without antifungals. Mediastinal re-exploration varied from undefined intervals to regimented 24-48-hour interval re-explorations, with final closures in the OR or ICU.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimum care for the patient with an open chest is evolving, and although there is a lack of a consensus DSC protocol, this review identifies mediastinal management, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and mediastinal re-exploration schedules/protocols as key areas for study to determine optimal care for DSC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"533-538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13024-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Primary delayed sternal closure (DSC) is a useful tool in the management of certain critically unstable patients after cardiac surgery, but there is a paucity of consensus management guidelines. This review aimed to identify critical key areas in DSC management.
Evidence acquisition: Systematic literature search was conducted in January 2023 and performed using Embase and PubMed. For original research articles were included that described outcomes and/or protocols for primary adult DSC patients, excluding articles on pediatric patients and secondary DSC.
Evidence synthesis: Eleven retrospective review original articles examined protocols for adult patients undergoing DSC. Hemodynamic instability and uncontrolled bleeding/coagulopathy were the two most common indications. Time to chest closure ranged 22 hours - 8.7 days. A range of dressings were employed, including Esmark and VAC dressings, with about half of authors not disclosing details. VAC was endorsed by several authors specifically for management of uncontrolled hemorrhage/coagulopathy. There was no consensus regarding irrigation solution for mediastinal prepping, with or without antibiotic solution. There was a lack of consensus on antibiotic selection and duration, varying from 2 and 3 multidrug regimens of broad-spectrum antibiotics, with/without antifungals. Mediastinal re-exploration varied from undefined intervals to regimented 24-48-hour interval re-explorations, with final closures in the OR or ICU.
Conclusions: The optimum care for the patient with an open chest is evolving, and although there is a lack of a consensus DSC protocol, this review identifies mediastinal management, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and mediastinal re-exploration schedules/protocols as key areas for study to determine optimal care for DSC patients.