Associations between intestinal lactic acid bacteria species and feeding habits of zoo animals.

Microbiome research reports Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.20517/mrr.2024.08
Masanori Horie, Tomoki Ohno, Hitoshi Iwahashi, Maiko Umemura, Kazutoshi Murotomi
{"title":"Associations between intestinal lactic acid bacteria species and feeding habits of zoo animals.","authors":"Masanori Horie, Tomoki Ohno, Hitoshi Iwahashi, Maiko Umemura, Kazutoshi Murotomi","doi":"10.20517/mrr.2024.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Lactic acid bacteria are among the most important bacteria in the intestinal flora and often have beneficial effects on the host. It is known that the bacteria that compose the intestinal flora are influenced by the feeding habits of host animals, but there was a lack of knowledge about lactic acid bacteria. Therefore, also considering the use of select strains as probiotics, this study investigated the relationship between the feeding habits of zoo animals and intestinal <i>Lactobacillaceae</i> species. <b>Methods:</b> Lactic acid bacteria belonging to the family Lactobacillaceae were isolated and identified from the feces of 20 zoo animal species (5 carnivores, 4 herbivores, 7 piscivores, and 4 omnivores). Isolates were identified by the homology of the 16S rRNA gene sequence. In addition, the fecal flora of host animals was evaluated by the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. <b>Results:</b> The types of <i>Lactobacillaceae</i> species were shown to vary depending on the feeding habits of host animals. <i>Ligilactobacillus salivarius</i> (<i>L. salivarius</i>) and <i>Ligilactobacillus saerimneri</i> (<i>L. saerimneri</i>) were isolated from the feces of carnivores. Whereas <i>Ligilactobacillus equi</i> (<i>L. equi</i>), <i>Limosilactobacillus gorillae</i>, <i>Ligilactobacillus hayakitensis</i> and <i>L. salivarius</i> were isolated from the feces of herbivores. These <i>Lactobacillaceae</i> species were not found in the feces of piscivores. Instead, <i>Enterococcus</i> were frequently found in piscivores. The fecal flora also differed according to the feeding habits of host animals; at the phylum level, Bacillota was predominant in all animals; on the other hand, herbivores tended to have a higher proportion of Bacteroidota than carnivores, and piscivores tended to have a higher proportion of Proteobacteria. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lactic acid bacteria differ among animal species in a manner dependent on the hosts' feeding habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94376,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome research reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Lactic acid bacteria are among the most important bacteria in the intestinal flora and often have beneficial effects on the host. It is known that the bacteria that compose the intestinal flora are influenced by the feeding habits of host animals, but there was a lack of knowledge about lactic acid bacteria. Therefore, also considering the use of select strains as probiotics, this study investigated the relationship between the feeding habits of zoo animals and intestinal Lactobacillaceae species. Methods: Lactic acid bacteria belonging to the family Lactobacillaceae were isolated and identified from the feces of 20 zoo animal species (5 carnivores, 4 herbivores, 7 piscivores, and 4 omnivores). Isolates were identified by the homology of the 16S rRNA gene sequence. In addition, the fecal flora of host animals was evaluated by the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Results: The types of Lactobacillaceae species were shown to vary depending on the feeding habits of host animals. Ligilactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) and Ligilactobacillus saerimneri (L. saerimneri) were isolated from the feces of carnivores. Whereas Ligilactobacillus equi (L. equi), Limosilactobacillus gorillae, Ligilactobacillus hayakitensis and L. salivarius were isolated from the feces of herbivores. These Lactobacillaceae species were not found in the feces of piscivores. Instead, Enterococcus were frequently found in piscivores. The fecal flora also differed according to the feeding habits of host animals; at the phylum level, Bacillota was predominant in all animals; on the other hand, herbivores tended to have a higher proportion of Bacteroidota than carnivores, and piscivores tended to have a higher proportion of Proteobacteria. Conclusion: Lactic acid bacteria differ among animal species in a manner dependent on the hosts' feeding habits.

动物园动物肠道乳酸菌种类与喂养习惯之间的关系
目的:乳酸菌是肠道菌群中最重要的细菌之一,通常对宿主有益。众所周知,组成肠道菌群的细菌会受到宿主动物饲养习惯的影响,但人们对乳酸菌的了解还很缺乏。因此,考虑到将精选菌株用作益生菌,本研究调查了动物园动物的饲养习惯与肠道乳酸菌种类之间的关系。研究方法从 20 种动物园动物(5 种食肉动物、4 种食草动物、7 种食鱼动物和 4 种杂食动物)的粪便中分离并鉴定了属于乳酸菌科的乳酸菌。根据 16S rRNA 基因序列的同源性对分离物进行鉴定。此外,还通过 16S rRNA 基因扩增片段测序评估了宿主动物的粪便菌群。研究结果根据宿主动物的摄食习惯,乳杆菌科细菌的种类也有所不同。从食肉动物的粪便中分离出了唾液酸魏氏乳杆菌(L. salivarius)和沙林氏魏氏乳杆菌(L. saerimneri)。而从食草动物的粪便中则分离出了马舌乳杆菌(L. equi)、猩红乳杆菌(Limosilactobacillus gorillae)、干酪乳杆菌(Ligilactobacillus hayakitensis)和唾液乳杆菌(L. salivarius)。在食鱼动物的粪便中没有发现这些乳酸杆菌。相反,食鱼动物的粪便中经常发现肠球菌。粪便菌群也因宿主动物的摄食习惯而不同;在门的层次上,所有动物的粪便中都以芽孢杆菌为主;另一方面,食草动物的类杆菌比例往往高于食肉动物,而食鱼动物的变形杆菌比例往往较高。结论乳酸菌在动物物种之间的差异取决于宿主的摄食习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信