Assessing fecal metaproteomics workflow and small protein recovery using DDA and DIA PASEF mass spectrometry.

Microbiome research reports Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.20517/mrr.2024.21
Angela Wang, Emily E F Fekete, Marybeth Creskey, Kai Cheng, Zhibin Ning, Annabelle Pfeifle, Xuguang Li, Daniel Figeys, Xu Zhang
{"title":"Assessing fecal metaproteomics workflow and small protein recovery using DDA and DIA PASEF mass spectrometry.","authors":"Angela Wang, Emily E F Fekete, Marybeth Creskey, Kai Cheng, Zhibin Ning, Annabelle Pfeifle, Xuguang Li, Daniel Figeys, Xu Zhang","doi":"10.20517/mrr.2024.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This study aims to evaluate the impact of experimental workflow on fecal metaproteomic observations, including the recovery of small and antimicrobial proteins often overlooked in metaproteomic studies. The overarching goal is to provide guidance for optimized metaproteomic experimental design, considering the emerging significance of the gut microbiome in human health, disease, and therapeutic interventions. <b>Methods:</b> Mouse feces were utilized as the experimental model. Fecal sample pre-processing methods (differential centrifugation and non-differential centrifugation), protein digestion techniques (in-solution and filter-aided), data acquisition modes (data-dependent and data-independent, or DDA and DIA) when combined with parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF), and different bioinformatic workflows were assessed. <b>Results:</b> We showed that, in DIA-PASEF metaproteomics, the library-free search using protein sequence database generated from DDA-PASEF data achieved better identifications than using the generated spectral library. Compared to DDA, DIA-PASEF identified more microbial peptides, quantified more proteins with fewer missing values, and recovered more small antimicrobial proteins. We did not observe any obvious impacts of protein digestion methods on both taxonomic and functional profiles. However, differential centrifugation decreased the recovery of small and antimicrobial proteins, biased the taxonomic observation with a marked overestimation of <i>Muribaculum</i> species, and altered the measured functional compositions of metaproteome. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study underscores the critical impact of experimental choices on metaproteomic outcomes and sheds light on the potential biases introduced at different stages of the workflow. The comprehensive methodological comparisons serve as a valuable guide for researchers aiming to enhance the accuracy and completeness of metaproteomic analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":94376,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome research reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the impact of experimental workflow on fecal metaproteomic observations, including the recovery of small and antimicrobial proteins often overlooked in metaproteomic studies. The overarching goal is to provide guidance for optimized metaproteomic experimental design, considering the emerging significance of the gut microbiome in human health, disease, and therapeutic interventions. Methods: Mouse feces were utilized as the experimental model. Fecal sample pre-processing methods (differential centrifugation and non-differential centrifugation), protein digestion techniques (in-solution and filter-aided), data acquisition modes (data-dependent and data-independent, or DDA and DIA) when combined with parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF), and different bioinformatic workflows were assessed. Results: We showed that, in DIA-PASEF metaproteomics, the library-free search using protein sequence database generated from DDA-PASEF data achieved better identifications than using the generated spectral library. Compared to DDA, DIA-PASEF identified more microbial peptides, quantified more proteins with fewer missing values, and recovered more small antimicrobial proteins. We did not observe any obvious impacts of protein digestion methods on both taxonomic and functional profiles. However, differential centrifugation decreased the recovery of small and antimicrobial proteins, biased the taxonomic observation with a marked overestimation of Muribaculum species, and altered the measured functional compositions of metaproteome. Conclusion: This study underscores the critical impact of experimental choices on metaproteomic outcomes and sheds light on the potential biases introduced at different stages of the workflow. The comprehensive methodological comparisons serve as a valuable guide for researchers aiming to enhance the accuracy and completeness of metaproteomic analyses.

使用 DDA 和 DIA PASEF 质谱仪评估粪便元蛋白组学工作流程和小蛋白回收率。
目的:本研究旨在评估实验工作流程对粪便元蛋白组观察结果的影响,包括元蛋白组研究中经常忽略的小蛋白和抗微生物蛋白的回收。考虑到肠道微生物组在人类健康、疾病和治疗干预中新出现的重要作用,本研究的总体目标是为优化元蛋白组实验设计提供指导。方法:利用小鼠粪便作为实验模型。评估了粪便样本预处理方法(差速离心和非差速离心)、蛋白质消化技术(溶液内消化和过滤辅助消化)、数据采集模式(依赖数据和不依赖数据,或 DDA 和 DIA)与并行累积-序列片段化(PASEF)相结合的情况,以及不同的生物信息学工作流程。结果显示我们发现,在DIA-PASEF元蛋白质组学中,使用DDA-PASEF数据生成的蛋白质序列数据库进行无库搜索比使用生成的谱库能获得更好的鉴定结果。与 DDA 相比,DIA-PASEF 鉴定出了更多的微生物肽,量化了更多的蛋白质,减少了缺失值,并回收了更多的小型抗微生物蛋白质。我们没有观察到蛋白质消化方法对分类和功能概况有任何明显的影响。然而,差速离心法降低了小蛋白和抗菌蛋白的回收率,使分类观察出现偏差,明显高估了 Muribaculum 的种类,并改变了元蛋白组的功能组成。结论本研究强调了实验选择对元蛋白组结果的重要影响,并揭示了工作流程不同阶段可能出现的偏差。全面的方法学比较为旨在提高元蛋白质组分析的准确性和完整性的研究人员提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信