Birth houses in Australia: Discovery of safe, transformative birthplaces

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Rowena Shakes , Mary Sidebotham , Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez
{"title":"Birth houses in Australia: Discovery of safe, transformative birthplaces","authors":"Rowena Shakes ,&nbsp;Mary Sidebotham ,&nbsp;Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Institutionalised birth settings do not meet the needs or wishes of all women. Current literature has reported on women’s experiences of alternative birthplaces, however there is no published data on Australian birth houses. Birth houses are low-technology home-like birthplaces where women receive care from endorsed private practice midwives. Knowledge of women’s perspectives and experiences of birth houses is unreported.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To gain understanding of women’s motivations for accessing and experiences of birth houses; and develop insight into the role of birth houses within Australian maternity services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in 2020. This methodology was chosen to centre women’s voices of their experiences. Women who had utilised birth houses for labour and birth were invited to participate. Those who responded completed a brief questionnaire to support diversity in participant selection. Interviews were conducted via video-link, based on semi-structured open-ended questions. These were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Ten women who utilised any of three known birth houses in Australia for labour and/or birth were interviewed. Four themes were revealed: “<em>I knew there must be another</em> way<em>”, “The best of both worlds”, “Discovering a safe space”</em> and <em>“Transformation”</em> with safety interwoven through each of these.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Women sought birthplaces and care congruent with their values and knowledge. Birth houses offered women a level of agency unavailable within hospital-based maternity care. While proximity to medical facilities was important, women’s definitions of safety transcended biomedical perspectives to incorporate emotional and psychosocial wellbeing. Women described their experiences in birth houses as transformational, highly satisfying, and positive influences for future birthplace choices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Women sought birth houses for safety, convenience, agency and autonomy. This study demonstrated these needs were met within birth houses, highlighting these birthplaces as a middle ground between home and hospital. High levels of satisfaction illustrate the validity of birth houses and reiterate the call for greater birthplace choice for all women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"37 6","pages":"Article 101831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Institutionalised birth settings do not meet the needs or wishes of all women. Current literature has reported on women’s experiences of alternative birthplaces, however there is no published data on Australian birth houses. Birth houses are low-technology home-like birthplaces where women receive care from endorsed private practice midwives. Knowledge of women’s perspectives and experiences of birth houses is unreported.

Aims

To gain understanding of women’s motivations for accessing and experiences of birth houses; and develop insight into the role of birth houses within Australian maternity services.

Methods

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in 2020. This methodology was chosen to centre women’s voices of their experiences. Women who had utilised birth houses for labour and birth were invited to participate. Those who responded completed a brief questionnaire to support diversity in participant selection. Interviews were conducted via video-link, based on semi-structured open-ended questions. These were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.

Findings

Ten women who utilised any of three known birth houses in Australia for labour and/or birth were interviewed. Four themes were revealed: “I knew there must be another way”, “The best of both worlds”, “Discovering a safe space” and “Transformation” with safety interwoven through each of these.

Discussion

Women sought birthplaces and care congruent with their values and knowledge. Birth houses offered women a level of agency unavailable within hospital-based maternity care. While proximity to medical facilities was important, women’s definitions of safety transcended biomedical perspectives to incorporate emotional and psychosocial wellbeing. Women described their experiences in birth houses as transformational, highly satisfying, and positive influences for future birthplace choices.

Conclusion

Women sought birth houses for safety, convenience, agency and autonomy. This study demonstrated these needs were met within birth houses, highlighting these birthplaces as a middle ground between home and hospital. High levels of satisfaction illustrate the validity of birth houses and reiterate the call for greater birthplace choice for all women.
澳大利亚的分娩之家:发现安全、变革性的分娩场所。
背景:机构化的分娩场所并不能满足所有妇女的需求或愿望。目前的文献报道了妇女在其他分娩场所的经历,但还没有关于澳大利亚分娩屋的公开数据。产房是技术含量较低的家庭式分娩场所,妇女在产房接受经认可的私人助产士的护理。目的:了解妇女使用产房的动机和体验;深入了解产房在澳大利亚产科服务中的作用:2020 年进行了一项定性描述性研究。选择这种方法的目的是集中了解妇女的经历。曾使用产房分娩的妇女应邀参加了研究。回复者填写了一份简短的调查问卷,以支持参与者选择的多样性。访谈通过视频链接进行,以半结构化开放式问题为基础。访谈内容逐字记录并进行主题分析:十名妇女接受了访谈,她们曾在澳大利亚三家已知的产房中的任何一家分娩和/或生产。共揭示了四个主题:"我知道一定还有其他办法"、"两全其美"、"发现一个安全的空间 "和 "转变",每一个主题都与安全交织在一起:妇女寻求与其价值观和知识相符的分娩场所和护理。产房为妇女提供了医院产科护理所没有的自主权。虽然靠近医疗设施很重要,但妇女对安全的定义超越了生物医学的视角,纳入了情感和社会心理健康。妇女们认为,她们在产房的经历是一种转变,令人非常满意,并对未来的分娩场所选择产生了积极影响:妇女选择产房是为了安全、方便、能动性和自主性。本研究表明,分娩室满足了这些需求,突出了分娩室作为家庭和医院之间的中间地带的作用。高满意度说明了产房的有效性,并再次呼吁为所有妇女提供更多的分娩场所选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信