Rowena Shakes , Mary Sidebotham , Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez
{"title":"Birth houses in Australia: Discovery of safe, transformative birthplaces","authors":"Rowena Shakes , Mary Sidebotham , Roslyn Donnellan-Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Institutionalised birth settings do not meet the needs or wishes of all women. Current literature has reported on women’s experiences of alternative birthplaces, however there is no published data on Australian birth houses. Birth houses are low-technology home-like birthplaces where women receive care from endorsed private practice midwives. Knowledge of women’s perspectives and experiences of birth houses is unreported.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To gain understanding of women’s motivations for accessing and experiences of birth houses; and develop insight into the role of birth houses within Australian maternity services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in 2020. This methodology was chosen to centre women’s voices of their experiences. Women who had utilised birth houses for labour and birth were invited to participate. Those who responded completed a brief questionnaire to support diversity in participant selection. Interviews were conducted via video-link, based on semi-structured open-ended questions. These were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Ten women who utilised any of three known birth houses in Australia for labour and/or birth were interviewed. Four themes were revealed: “<em>I knew there must be another</em> way<em>”, “The best of both worlds”, “Discovering a safe space”</em> and <em>“Transformation”</em> with safety interwoven through each of these.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Women sought birthplaces and care congruent with their values and knowledge. Birth houses offered women a level of agency unavailable within hospital-based maternity care. While proximity to medical facilities was important, women’s definitions of safety transcended biomedical perspectives to incorporate emotional and psychosocial wellbeing. Women described their experiences in birth houses as transformational, highly satisfying, and positive influences for future birthplace choices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Women sought birth houses for safety, convenience, agency and autonomy. This study demonstrated these needs were met within birth houses, highlighting these birthplaces as a middle ground between home and hospital. High levels of satisfaction illustrate the validity of birth houses and reiterate the call for greater birthplace choice for all women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"37 6","pages":"Article 101831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519224002919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Institutionalised birth settings do not meet the needs or wishes of all women. Current literature has reported on women’s experiences of alternative birthplaces, however there is no published data on Australian birth houses. Birth houses are low-technology home-like birthplaces where women receive care from endorsed private practice midwives. Knowledge of women’s perspectives and experiences of birth houses is unreported.
Aims
To gain understanding of women’s motivations for accessing and experiences of birth houses; and develop insight into the role of birth houses within Australian maternity services.
Methods
A qualitative descriptive study was conducted in 2020. This methodology was chosen to centre women’s voices of their experiences. Women who had utilised birth houses for labour and birth were invited to participate. Those who responded completed a brief questionnaire to support diversity in participant selection. Interviews were conducted via video-link, based on semi-structured open-ended questions. These were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
Findings
Ten women who utilised any of three known birth houses in Australia for labour and/or birth were interviewed. Four themes were revealed: “I knew there must be another way”, “The best of both worlds”, “Discovering a safe space” and “Transformation” with safety interwoven through each of these.
Discussion
Women sought birthplaces and care congruent with their values and knowledge. Birth houses offered women a level of agency unavailable within hospital-based maternity care. While proximity to medical facilities was important, women’s definitions of safety transcended biomedical perspectives to incorporate emotional and psychosocial wellbeing. Women described their experiences in birth houses as transformational, highly satisfying, and positive influences for future birthplace choices.
Conclusion
Women sought birth houses for safety, convenience, agency and autonomy. This study demonstrated these needs were met within birth houses, highlighting these birthplaces as a middle ground between home and hospital. High levels of satisfaction illustrate the validity of birth houses and reiterate the call for greater birthplace choice for all women.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.