Comparison of targeted web-based advertising versus traditional methods for recruiting older adults into clinical trials.

Abstract

Background: Recruiting older adults into clinical trials can be particularly challenging. Our objective was to determine if targeted web-based advertising is an effective recruitment strategy.

Methods: We compared the recruitment rates of traditional and targeted web-based methods for three representative clinical trials involving older adults. All studies utilized traditional recruitment methods initially, but shifted toward primarily targeted web-based advertising after experiencing slow recruitment rates.

Results: We found that web-based advertising reached more individuals compared to traditional methods. Compared to traditional methods, web-based methods also had at least twice the rate of expressed interest, completion of telephone and in-person screening, eligibility, and enrollment. Additionally, the proportion of individuals excluded after the telephone screening did not differ according to whether targeted web-based advertising (STAMINA: 51%; Berries and Steps: 62%; ISTIM: 20%) or traditional methods (STAMINA: 48%; Berries and Steps: 69%; ISTIM: 23%) were used within each study. Those recruited using web-based advertisements tended to be younger compared to traditional methods, but were similar in racial distribution and education.

Conclusion: Targeted web-based advertisements may be more effective in recruiting older adults for clinical trials at a faster rate than traditional recruitment methods, but need further evaluation of compatible study designs, potential population bias, and cost-effectiveness.