Prognostic impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in the stratification of patients with rectal cancer

Vincenzo Vigorita , Oscar Cano-Valderrama , Raquel Sánchez-Santos , Marta Paniagua-Garcia-Señorans , Enrique Moncada , Gianluca Pellino , Jesús Paredes-Cotoré , Enrique Casal
{"title":"Prognostic impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in the stratification of patients with rectal cancer","authors":"Vincenzo Vigorita ,&nbsp;Oscar Cano-Valderrama ,&nbsp;Raquel Sánchez-Santos ,&nbsp;Marta Paniagua-Garcia-Señorans ,&nbsp;Enrique Moncada ,&nbsp;Gianluca Pellino ,&nbsp;Jesús Paredes-Cotoré ,&nbsp;Enrique Casal","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan–Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE.</div><div>Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":"102 12","pages":"Pages 649-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173507724002205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial.

Material and methods

A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan–Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves.

Results

Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE.
Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711).

Conclusion

LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.

Abstract Image

淋巴结阳性几率对数(LODDS)在直肠癌患者分层中的预后影响。
介绍:在预测直肠癌患者的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)时,TNM分期系统的N分类、淋巴结比(LNR)和阳性淋巴结的对数几率(LODDS)的使用仍存在争议:对2008年至2017年间在大学综合医院接受手术的445名直肠癌患者进行了回顾性研究。根据淋巴结检查数量(NLNE)、N分期、LNR和LODDS对患者进行分层。分析采用对数秩检验、Kaplan-Meier函数、Cox回归和ROC曲线:结果:五年的OS和DFS分别为73.7%和62.5%。NLNE不同,差异无统计学意义。LNR和LODDS的增加与较短的OS和DFS相关,与NLNE无关。多变量分析显示,N分期、LNR和LODDS与OS和DFS独立相关;然而,LODDS系统获得了最佳曲线下面积,对OS(AUC:0.679)和DFS(AUC:0.711)具有更强的预测能力:结论:LODDS 和 LNR 提供的预后信息与 NLNE 无关。结论:LODDS 和 LNR 提供的预后信息与 NLNE 无关。与 LNR 和 N 分期相比,LODDS 对阴性结节患者的预后准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信