Dropout Reasons in an Intensive Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders. Reflections on New Treatment Designs

Gustavo Irazoqui, Rafael Groisman, Isis Gruccos, Juana Brady, Carola Cassinelli, Ximena Cerviño, Luciana García, Federico Pavlovsky
{"title":"Dropout Reasons in an Intensive Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders. Reflections on New Treatment Designs","authors":"Gustavo Irazoqui, Rafael Groisman, Isis Gruccos, Juana Brady, Carola Cassinelli, Ximena Cerviño, Luciana García, Federico Pavlovsky","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v35i165.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are scarce studies about why patients dropout addiction treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed analysis about data from 55 patients who discontinued an intensive outpatient approach between June 2019 and November 2021 and their responses to a questionnaire were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dropout rate was 29.2%, with a median [95% CI] of 113 days [47-255]. Of the total, 40/55 responded to the questionnaire, 12.5% reported an increase in use and 75% were under mental health treatment. The main reason for dropout was personal, related to ambivalence and the perception of not having a problem. Reasons associated with the program approach included global abstinence and group therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission strategies, diversification of proposals and inclusion of bond therapy could improve the effectiveness of outpatient addiction programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"35 165, jul.-sep.","pages":"6-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v35i165.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are scarce studies about why patients dropout addiction treatments.

Methods: A mixed analysis about data from 55 patients who discontinued an intensive outpatient approach between June 2019 and November 2021 and their responses to a questionnaire were evaluated.

Results: The dropout rate was 29.2%, with a median [95% CI] of 113 days [47-255]. Of the total, 40/55 responded to the questionnaire, 12.5% reported an increase in use and 75% were under mental health treatment. The main reason for dropout was personal, related to ambivalence and the perception of not having a problem. Reasons associated with the program approach included global abstinence and group therapy.

Conclusions: Admission strategies, diversification of proposals and inclusion of bond therapy could improve the effectiveness of outpatient addiction programs.

强化门诊药物使用障碍治疗的辍学原因。方案设计视角。
介绍:对戒毒治疗患者辍学的原因研究不足。材料与方法:采用定量-定性分析方法,评估了在 2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 11 月期间中断强化门诊治疗的 55 名患者的数据及其对问卷的答复。结果:辍学率为 29.2%,中位数[95% CI]为 113 天[47-255]。其中,40 人回复了问卷,12.5% 的人表示吸毒次数有所增加,75% 的人正在接受心理健康治疗。退出的主要原因是个人原因,与矛盾心理和认为自己没有问题有关。与计划方法有关的原因包括全面戒断和集体治疗。结论接纳策略、方法多样化以及纳入联系疗法可以提高门诊戒毒计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信