Psychometric adaptation and performance of the Scale of Physical and Emotional Torment towards Animals

Álvarez-Merlano Nicolás, Rocío González-Navarro, José Tapia-Arroyo
{"title":"Psychometric adaptation and performance of the Scale of Physical and Emotional Torment towards Animals","authors":"Álvarez-Merlano Nicolás, Rocío González-Navarro, José Tapia-Arroyo","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v35i165.659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical and emotional torment towards animals during childhood and emerging adulthood has been associated with the diagnosis of various behavioral disorders. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Animal Physical and Emotional Torment Scale (PET) in a sample of university students from the Colombian Caribbean.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a quantitative instrumental study with a cross-sectional design. Three models were exploratively evaluated in 100 university students, and two solutions of the instrument were confirmed in 140 university\nstudents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), two models met the factor allocation criteria. The first model yielded a two-dimensional factorial structure that accounted for 68.39% of the variance in the data, with a significant Bartlett's sphericity (331,099, df=36, p<.002), an acceptable Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO=.73), and adequate total and dimensional internal consistency (ordinal total α=.825; ordinal subscale 1α=.93, and ordinal subscale 2 α=.75). The second model resulted in a unidimensional factorial structure that explained 73.16% of the variance, with appropriate indicators of sphericity, sample size, and consistency (216.369, df=6, p<.000; KMO=.73, and ordinal total α=.877). The explored solutions were confirmed, as both models showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (two-dimensional model: X2/df=2.33, GFI=.991, AGFI=.969, CFI=.944, NFI=.970, RMSEA=.070, and SRMR=.070; unidimensional model: X2/df=1.98, GFI=.998, AGFI=.987, CFI=.968, NFI=.994, RMSEA=.068, and SRMR=.040).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The PET scale in its original and reduced versions is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing this construct in the Colombian sociocultural context.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":"35 165, jul.-sep.","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v35i165.659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physical and emotional torment towards animals during childhood and emerging adulthood has been associated with the diagnosis of various behavioral disorders. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Animal Physical and Emotional Torment Scale (PET) in a sample of university students from the Colombian Caribbean.

Materials and methods: This was a quantitative instrumental study with a cross-sectional design. Three models were exploratively evaluated in 100 university students, and two solutions of the instrument were confirmed in 140 university students.

Results: In the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), two models met the factor allocation criteria. The first model yielded a two-dimensional factorial structure that accounted for 68.39% of the variance in the data, with a significant Bartlett's sphericity (331,099, df=36, p<.002), an acceptable Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO=.73), and adequate total and dimensional internal consistency (ordinal total α=.825; ordinal subscale 1α=.93, and ordinal subscale 2 α=.75). The second model resulted in a unidimensional factorial structure that explained 73.16% of the variance, with appropriate indicators of sphericity, sample size, and consistency (216.369, df=6, p<.000; KMO=.73, and ordinal total α=.877). The explored solutions were confirmed, as both models showed satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (two-dimensional model: X2/df=2.33, GFI=.991, AGFI=.969, CFI=.944, NFI=.970, RMSEA=.070, and SRMR=.070; unidimensional model: X2/df=1.98, GFI=.998, AGFI=.987, CFI=.968, NFI=.994, RMSEA=.068, and SRMR=.040).

Discussion and conclusions: The PET scale in its original and reduced versions is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing this construct in the Colombian sociocultural context.

动物身心折磨量表的适应性和心理测量性能。
简介儿童期和成年期对动物的身心折磨与各种行为障碍的诊断有关。本研究的目的是在哥伦比亚加勒比海地区的大学生样本中改编并验证 "对动物的身心折磨量表"(PET)。材料和方法:定量工具研究,采用横断面方法。在 100 名大学生中探索性地评估了三个模型,在 140 名大学生中确认了该工具的两个解决方案。结果:在探索性因子分析(EFA)中,两个模型符合因子分配;第一个模型产生了一个二维因子结构,解释了 68.39% 的数据方差,具有显著的巴特利特球形度(331.099, gl=36, Sig.=.002)、可接受的 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 样本规模充分性指标(KMO=.73)以及充分的总内部一致性和维内部一致性(总序数ɑ=.825;子量表 1 序数ɑ=.93,子量表 2 序数ɑ=.75)。第二个报告的单维因子结构解释了 73.16%的问题,并且球形度、样本量和一致性指标充足(216.369,gl=6,Sig.=.000;KMO=.73,总序数ɑ=.877)。两个模型的拟合优度指标均令人满意(二维模型:X 2 ɑ /gl=2.33;GFI=.991;AGFI=.969;CFI=.944;NFI=.970;RMSEA=.070 和 SRMR=.070。一维模型:X /gl=1.98;GFI=.998;AGFI=.987;CFI=.968;NFI=.994;RMSEA=.068 和 SRMR=.040)。讨论和结论:在哥伦比亚的社会文化背景下,PET 量表的原始版本和简化版本是评估该结构的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信