A feasibility study of the CRISP intervention; a cardiovascular risk reduction intervention in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13596.2
Tom M Withers, Colin J Greaves, Matt J Bown, Faye Ashton, Aimee J Scott, Vanessa E Hollings, Ann M Elsworth, Athanasios Saratzis
{"title":"A feasibility study of the CRISP intervention; a cardiovascular risk reduction intervention in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.","authors":"Tom M Withers, Colin J Greaves, Matt J Bown, Faye Ashton, Aimee J Scott, Vanessa E Hollings, Ann M Elsworth, Athanasios Saratzis","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13596.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening/surveillance is implemented widely. Those in AAA-surveillance are at high-risk of cardiovascular-events. We developed an intervention, called CRISP, using intervention-mapping, to reduce cardiovascular-risk in AAA-surveillance. This study tested the CRISP intervention in routine clinical-care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CRISP intervention, consisting of a nurse-led cardiovascular risk assessment and subsequent lifestyle change support using a self-care workbook and low-intensity nurse input was delivered in two screening/surveillance programmes. Those consenting to take part were followed-up with cardiovascular-assessments. Fidelity of intervention-delivery was assessed quantitatively/qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>40 men (mean age 75 ± 7 years) took part over four months and followed-up for a minimum six months. A sub-group of 25 patients and nine Health Care Professionals (HCPs) were interviewed. The median number of risk-factors that patients chose to focus on was two (range 0 to 4), with physical activity (n=17) being the most popular. Participants who had a 'red light' risk factor for stress, low mood, smoking or alcohol intake were offered a referral to appropriate services. Two were offered referral to mental-health services and took it up, three declined referrals to smoking or alcohol support services. The fidelity of intervention-delivery (a score intervention components delivered to each patient based on a score from 0 to 5, with 5 being highest delivery fidelity) was generally low. The highest mean score (on a 0-5 scale) for the nurse assessment was 1.5 for engaging the participant, lowest 0.5 for exploring the importance for selected lifestyle behaviours. In qualitative interviews, the intervention was liked by patients/HCPs. Based on qualitative interviews and observations, the low fidelity of intervention-delivery was due to intervention-training not being detailed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CRISP can be delivered in AAA-surveillance, but fidelity of delivery is low. The intervention and its training need to be refined/tested before wider implementation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>ISRCTN9399399518/11/20).</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13596.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening/surveillance is implemented widely. Those in AAA-surveillance are at high-risk of cardiovascular-events. We developed an intervention, called CRISP, using intervention-mapping, to reduce cardiovascular-risk in AAA-surveillance. This study tested the CRISP intervention in routine clinical-care.

Methods: The CRISP intervention, consisting of a nurse-led cardiovascular risk assessment and subsequent lifestyle change support using a self-care workbook and low-intensity nurse input was delivered in two screening/surveillance programmes. Those consenting to take part were followed-up with cardiovascular-assessments. Fidelity of intervention-delivery was assessed quantitatively/qualitatively.

Results: 40 men (mean age 75 ± 7 years) took part over four months and followed-up for a minimum six months. A sub-group of 25 patients and nine Health Care Professionals (HCPs) were interviewed. The median number of risk-factors that patients chose to focus on was two (range 0 to 4), with physical activity (n=17) being the most popular. Participants who had a 'red light' risk factor for stress, low mood, smoking or alcohol intake were offered a referral to appropriate services. Two were offered referral to mental-health services and took it up, three declined referrals to smoking or alcohol support services. The fidelity of intervention-delivery (a score intervention components delivered to each patient based on a score from 0 to 5, with 5 being highest delivery fidelity) was generally low. The highest mean score (on a 0-5 scale) for the nurse assessment was 1.5 for engaging the participant, lowest 0.5 for exploring the importance for selected lifestyle behaviours. In qualitative interviews, the intervention was liked by patients/HCPs. Based on qualitative interviews and observations, the low fidelity of intervention-delivery was due to intervention-training not being detailed.

Conclusions: CRISP can be delivered in AAA-surveillance, but fidelity of delivery is low. The intervention and its training need to be refined/tested before wider implementation.

Registration: ISRCTN9399399518/11/20).

CRISP 干预的可行性研究;一项针对腹主动脉瘤患者的降低心血管风险干预措施。
背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查/监测已广泛实施。接受 AAA 监测的人是心血管事件的高危人群。我们开发了一种名为 "CRISP "的干预措施,利用干预映射来降低 AAA 监测中的心血管风险。本研究在常规临床护理中对 CRISP 干预进行了测试:CRISP干预措施包括由护士主导的心血管风险评估,以及随后使用自我保健工作手册和低强度护士投入提供的生活方式改变支持。对同意参与的人进行了心血管评估跟踪。对干预实施的忠实度进行了定量/定性评估:40名男性(平均年龄为75 ± 7岁)参加了为期4个月的活动,并接受了至少6个月的随访。对 25 名患者和 9 名医护人员进行了访谈。患者选择关注的风险因素的中位数为两个(范围从 0 到 4),其中最受欢迎的是体育锻炼(人数=17)。对于压力、情绪低落、吸烟或酗酒等 "亮红灯 "风险因素的参与者,他们会被转介到适当的服务机构。其中两人被转介到心理健康服务机构并接受了转介,三人拒绝转介到吸烟或酗酒支持服务机构。干预实施的忠实度(根据从 0 到 5 的分值对每位患者实施的干预内容进行评分,5 分表示实施的忠实度最高)普遍较低。护士评估的最高平均分(0-5 分)为 1.5 分,用于吸引参与者参与,最低分为 0.5 分,用于探讨选定生活方式行为的重要性。在定性访谈中,干预受到了患者/保健医生的喜爱。根据定性访谈和观察结果,干预实施的保真度较低的原因是干预培训不够详细:结论:CRISP 可在 AAA 监测中实施,但实施的忠实度较低。结论:CRISP 可在 AAA 监控中实施,但实施的忠实度较低,在广泛实施前需要对干预及其培训进行完善/测试:ISRCTN9399399518/11/20).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信