A qualitative exploration of the implementation facilitators and challenges of a community health worker program to address health disparities for people recently released from incarceration using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Quinn O Hood, Natalia Irvine, Krina Shah, Shahmir H Ali, Tamar Adjoian Mezzacca, Michael Serrano, Lorna E Thorpe, Terry T K Huang, Maria R Khan, Nadia Islam
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of the implementation facilitators and challenges of a community health worker program to address health disparities for people recently released from incarceration using the consolidated framework for implementation research.","authors":"Quinn O Hood, Natalia Irvine, Krina Shah, Shahmir H Ali, Tamar Adjoian Mezzacca, Michael Serrano, Lorna E Thorpe, Terry T K Huang, Maria R Khan, Nadia Islam","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00653-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the potential for community health worker (CHW)-led programs to improve the health of people with justice involvement (PWJI), little is known about the practical implementation of such models. We explored barriers and facilitators to implementation of a municipal CHW program, the Health Justice Network (NYC HJN), led by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) in partnership with three reentry-focused community-based organizations (CBOs) and three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that was designed to serve the health and social service needs of PWJI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of CHWs, partner site supervisors, and DOHMH staff. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim. Codes and themes were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand facilitators and barriers to NYC HJN implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Important facilitators to implementation included: lived experience of CHWs, as well as NYC HJN's voluntary nature, lack of onerous eligibility criteria, and prioritization of participant needs. One barrier was the lack of a formal implementation protocol. Themes identified as facilitators in some instances and barriers in others were CHW integration into site partners, the expansive scope of work for CHWs, the integration of a trauma-informed approach, values alignment and existing infrastructure, leadership engagement, CHW training and support, and input, feedback, and communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings will help inform how to successfully implement future CHW-led interventions for PWJI with municipal, health, and social service partners.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00653-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential for community health worker (CHW)-led programs to improve the health of people with justice involvement (PWJI), little is known about the practical implementation of such models. We explored barriers and facilitators to implementation of a municipal CHW program, the Health Justice Network (NYC HJN), led by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) in partnership with three reentry-focused community-based organizations (CBOs) and three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that was designed to serve the health and social service needs of PWJI.

Methods: Eighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of CHWs, partner site supervisors, and DOHMH staff. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim. Codes and themes were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand facilitators and barriers to NYC HJN implementation.

Results: Important facilitators to implementation included: lived experience of CHWs, as well as NYC HJN's voluntary nature, lack of onerous eligibility criteria, and prioritization of participant needs. One barrier was the lack of a formal implementation protocol. Themes identified as facilitators in some instances and barriers in others were CHW integration into site partners, the expansive scope of work for CHWs, the integration of a trauma-informed approach, values alignment and existing infrastructure, leadership engagement, CHW training and support, and input, feedback, and communication.

Conclusions: Findings will help inform how to successfully implement future CHW-led interventions for PWJI with municipal, health, and social service partners.

利用实施研究的综合框架,对社区卫生工作人员计划的实施促进因素和挑战进行定性探索,以解决新近刑满释放人员的健康差异问题。
背景:尽管以社区保健员(CHW)为主导的项目具有改善有司法牵连者(PWJI)健康状况的潜力,但人们对此类模式的实际实施情况却知之甚少。我们探讨了由纽约市卫生和心理卫生局(DOHMH)牵头,与三家以重返社会为重点的社区组织(CBOs)和三家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHCs)合作实施的市级社区保健员计划--健康司法网络(NYC HJN)--的障碍和促进因素,该计划旨在满足PWJI的健康和社会服务需求:对 CHW、合作机构主管和 DOHMH 工作人员进行了 18 次深入的定性访谈。访谈以虚拟方式进行,并逐字记录。采用实施研究综合框架 (CFIR) 制定了代码和主题,以了解纽约市 HJN 实施的促进因素和障碍:实施的重要促进因素包括:社区保健工作者的生活经验、纽约市 HJN 的自愿性质、没有苛刻的资格标准以及优先考虑参与者的需求。一个障碍是缺乏正式的实施协议。在某些情况下被认为是促进因素而在另一些情况下被认为是障碍的主题是 CHW 与现场合作伙伴的整合、CHW 工作范围的扩大、创伤知情方法的整合、价值观的统一和现有的基础设施、领导层的参与、CHW 的培训和支持以及投入、反馈和沟通:结论:研究结果将有助于为今后如何与市政、卫生和社会服务合作伙伴一起成功实施由社区保健工作者领导的针对公共卫生和司法机构的干预措施提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信