Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in patients undergoing nasal surgeries for prevention of emergence agitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gustavo R.M. Wegner , Bruno F.M. Wegner , Henrik G. Oliveira , Luis A. Costa , Luigi W. Spagnol , Valentine W. Spagnol , Gilberto T.F. de Oliveira Filho
{"title":"Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in patients undergoing nasal surgeries for prevention of emergence agitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Gustavo R.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Bruno F.M. Wegner ,&nbsp;Henrik G. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Luis A. Costa ,&nbsp;Luigi W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Valentine W. Spagnol ,&nbsp;Gilberto T.F. de Oliveira Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergence agitation is a common complication after nasal surgeries, marked by increased agitation and a heightened risk of injuries. Factors like urinary catheter, endotracheal tube, postoperative pain, and younger age contribute to its occurrence. Due to the variety of preventive approaches reported in the literature, a network meta-analysis is essential.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review employs a network meta-analysis design, following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA-NMA criteria. Inclusion criteria involve randomized controlled studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing emergence agitation in nasal surgeries. Electronic searches, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, without language or date restrictions, were conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, and data extraction was performed using standardized tables. Bayesian NMA, MetaInsight web app, and Cochrane Foundation Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were applied for data analysis and bias assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After a rigorous selection process, 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing 2,122 patients and 14 interventions were included. The best ranked treatments identified were intraoperative dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg-<sup>1</sup> for 10 minutes as a bolus, followed by 0.4 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>.h<sup>-1</sup>), bilateral nasociliary and maxillary nerve block, ketamine (0.5 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> administered 20 minutes before the end of surgery), nasal compression for 40 minutes before anesthesia induction, and suction above the cuff of the endotracheal tube.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions emerged as effective strategies in mitigating emergence agitation after nasal surgeries, offering clinicians valuable options for improving postoperative outcomes in this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 1","pages":"Article 844565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001424000873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergence agitation is a common complication after nasal surgeries, marked by increased agitation and a heightened risk of injuries. Factors like urinary catheter, endotracheal tube, postoperative pain, and younger age contribute to its occurrence. Due to the variety of preventive approaches reported in the literature, a network meta-analysis is essential.

Methods

This systematic review employs a network meta-analysis design, following Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA-NMA criteria. Inclusion criteria involve randomized controlled studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing emergence agitation in nasal surgeries. Electronic searches, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, without language or date restrictions, were conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, and data extraction was performed using standardized tables. Bayesian NMA, MetaInsight web app, and Cochrane Foundation Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were applied for data analysis and bias assessment.

Results

After a rigorous selection process, 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) encompassing 2,122 patients and 14 interventions were included. The best ranked treatments identified were intraoperative dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg-1 for 10 minutes as a bolus, followed by 0.4 μg.kg-1.h-1), bilateral nasociliary and maxillary nerve block, ketamine (0.5 mg.kg-1 administered 20 minutes before the end of surgery), nasal compression for 40 minutes before anesthesia induction, and suction above the cuff of the endotracheal tube.

Conclusions

Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions emerged as effective strategies in mitigating emergence agitation after nasal surgeries, offering clinicians valuable options for improving postoperative outcomes in this patient population.
为预防鼻腔手术患者出现躁动而采取的药物和非药物干预措施:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:出院躁动是鼻腔手术后常见的并发症,主要表现为躁动加剧和受伤风险增加。导尿管、气管插管、术后疼痛和年龄较小等因素都是导致其发生的原因。由于文献中报道的预防方法多种多样,因此进行网络荟萃分析至关重要:本系统综述采用网络荟萃分析设计,遵循 Cochrane 手册和 PRISMA-NMA 标准。纳入标准包括有关预防鼻腔手术中出现躁动的药物和非药物干预措施的随机对照研究。电子检索包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science,无语言和日期限制。两名独立审稿人对研究进行筛选,并使用标准表格进行数据提取。贝叶斯NMA、MetaInsight网络应用程序和Cochrane基金会偏倚风险评估工具被用于数据分析和偏倚评估:经过严格筛选,共纳入 17 项随机对照试验 (RCT),包括 2,122 名患者和 14 项干预措施。结果:经过严格的筛选过程,共纳入了17项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及2122名患者和14项干预措施,其中排名最好的治疗方法是术中使用右美托咪定(1 μg.kg-1,持续10分钟作为栓剂,之后为0.4 μg.kg-1.h-1)、双侧鼻睫和上颌神经阻滞、氯胺酮(0.5 mg.kg-1,手术结束前20分钟给药)、麻醉诱导前40分钟鼻腔按压和气管插管袖带上方抽吸:药物和非药物干预都是减轻鼻腔手术后出现躁动的有效策略,为临床医生改善这类患者的术后效果提供了宝贵的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信