Caring for Long Covid patients in primary healthcare: a cross-sectional study on general practitioners' knowledge, perception and experience in Belgium and Malta.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sarah Moreels, Sherihane Bensemmane, Robrecht De Schreye, Sarah Cuschieri
{"title":"Caring for Long Covid patients in primary healthcare: a cross-sectional study on general practitioners' knowledge, perception and experience in Belgium and Malta.","authors":"Sarah Moreels, Sherihane Bensemmane, Robrecht De Schreye, Sarah Cuschieri","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02617-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At least 10% of Covid-19 recovered individuals experience persistent symptoms (Long Covid). Primary healthcare and general practitioners (GPs) are at the forefront in their care. In this study, GPs' knowledge, perceptions and experiences with Long Covid, and the definition used in two countries, are investigated to provide insight into GPs' care for Long Covid patients at a cross-country level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study targeted towards GPs was conducted in Belgium and Malta during spring and early summer 2022. An online survey consisting of 15 questions on Long Covid was disseminated. Additionally, country-specific practice and demographic characteristics were collected. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 GPs (Belgium = 105; Malta = 45) responded. Female GPs represented 58.0%, median age was 49 years (IQR: 37-61). Concerning GPs' knowledge and perception on Long Covid, in both countries, most GPs reported insufficient scientific knowledge and information on Long Covid diagnosis and treatment. Access to educational material was limited and an awareness-rising campaign on Long Covid was deemed necessary. Moreover, two out of three GPs stated that Long Covid patients were not well followed up by primary healthcare in mid-2022. For diagnosing Long Covid, 54.7% required a positive Covid-19 test, more often among Belgian GPs than Maltese (64.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.036). To assess Long Covid, GPs mainly applied diagnostic criteria by themselves (47.3%) in combination with persistent symptoms (4 weeks to 5 months). Most GPs had experience with Long Covid patients in their practice, regardless of practice type and GPs' country, sex or age (p = 0.353; p = 0.241; p = 0.194; p = 0.058). Although most GPs (94.7%) stated that Long Covid patients should follow multidisciplinary approach, 48.3% reported providing care for these patients themselves or with GP colleagues and only 29.8% by multidisciplinary cooperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs frequently provide (multidisciplinary) care to Long Covid patients and GPs' care showed similarities at cross-country level. Although GPs perceive lack of scientific knowledge and educational material on Long Covid, similar diagnostic criteria among GPs were noted. Uniform evidence-based guidelines, scientific support and training for GP across Europe must be a priority to enhance their treatment approach to Long Covid.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02617-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At least 10% of Covid-19 recovered individuals experience persistent symptoms (Long Covid). Primary healthcare and general practitioners (GPs) are at the forefront in their care. In this study, GPs' knowledge, perceptions and experiences with Long Covid, and the definition used in two countries, are investigated to provide insight into GPs' care for Long Covid patients at a cross-country level.

Methods: A cross-sectional study targeted towards GPs was conducted in Belgium and Malta during spring and early summer 2022. An online survey consisting of 15 questions on Long Covid was disseminated. Additionally, country-specific practice and demographic characteristics were collected. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 150 GPs (Belgium = 105; Malta = 45) responded. Female GPs represented 58.0%, median age was 49 years (IQR: 37-61). Concerning GPs' knowledge and perception on Long Covid, in both countries, most GPs reported insufficient scientific knowledge and information on Long Covid diagnosis and treatment. Access to educational material was limited and an awareness-rising campaign on Long Covid was deemed necessary. Moreover, two out of three GPs stated that Long Covid patients were not well followed up by primary healthcare in mid-2022. For diagnosing Long Covid, 54.7% required a positive Covid-19 test, more often among Belgian GPs than Maltese (64.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.036). To assess Long Covid, GPs mainly applied diagnostic criteria by themselves (47.3%) in combination with persistent symptoms (4 weeks to 5 months). Most GPs had experience with Long Covid patients in their practice, regardless of practice type and GPs' country, sex or age (p = 0.353; p = 0.241; p = 0.194; p = 0.058). Although most GPs (94.7%) stated that Long Covid patients should follow multidisciplinary approach, 48.3% reported providing care for these patients themselves or with GP colleagues and only 29.8% by multidisciplinary cooperation.

Conclusions: GPs frequently provide (multidisciplinary) care to Long Covid patients and GPs' care showed similarities at cross-country level. Although GPs perceive lack of scientific knowledge and educational material on Long Covid, similar diagnostic criteria among GPs were noted. Uniform evidence-based guidelines, scientific support and training for GP across Europe must be a priority to enhance their treatment approach to Long Covid.

在初级医疗保健中照顾长期住院病人:关于比利时和马耳他全科医生的知识、看法和经验的横断面研究。
背景:至少 10%的 Covid-19 康复者会出现持续症状(Long Covid)。初级医疗保健和全科医生(GPs)在他们的护理中处于最前沿。本研究调查了全科医生对长Covid的了解、看法和经验,以及两个国家所使用的定义,以便深入了解全科医生对长Covid患者的跨国护理情况:方法:2022 年春季和初夏,在比利时和马耳他开展了一项针对全科医生的横断面研究。网上调查包括 15 个有关 Long Covid 的问题。此外,还收集了特定国家的实践和人口特征。结果显示,共有 150 名全科医生(比利时)接受了调查:共有 150 名全科医生(比利时=105;马耳他=45)做出了回应。女性全科医生占 58.0%,年龄中位数为 49 岁(IQR:37-61)。关于全科医生对朗阁维德的了解和看法,两国大多数全科医生都表示对朗阁维德的诊断和治疗缺乏足够的科学知识和信息。获得教育材料的途径有限,因此有必要开展朗科维德宣传活动。此外,每三名全科医生中就有两名表示,2022 年中期,基层医疗机构没有对 Long Covid 患者进行良好的随访。在诊断 Long Covid 时,54.7% 的患者需要 Covid-19 检测呈阳性,比利时全科医生的这一比例高于马耳他全科医生(64.3% 对 45.2%,P = 0.036)。在评估长Covid时,全科医生主要是结合持续症状(4周至5个月)自行应用诊断标准(47.3%)。大多数全科医生在其执业过程中都曾接诊过 Long Covid 患者,与执业类型、全科医生所在国家、性别或年龄无关(P = 0.353;P = 0.241;P = 0.194;P = 0.058)。尽管大多数全科医生(94.7%)表示,Long Covid 患者应遵循多学科方法,但 48.3% 的全科医生表示,他们自己或与全科医生同事一起为这些患者提供护理,只有 29.8% 的全科医生通过多学科合作为患者提供护理:结论:全科医生经常为长 Covid 患者提供(多学科)护理,全科医生的护理在跨国层面上显示出相似性。尽管全科医生认为缺乏有关长Covid的科学知识和教育材料,但全科医生的诊断标准相似。必须在欧洲范围内优先为全科医生提供统一的循证指南、科学支持和培训,以加强他们对长涎管病的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信