Multiparametric MRI Radiomics With Machine Learning for Differentiating HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Breast Cancer: Model Development, Testing, and Interpretability Analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yongxin Chen, Siyi Chen, Wenjie Tang, Qingcong Konge, Zhidan Zhong, Xiaomeng Yu, Yi Sui, Wenke Hu, Xinqing Jiang, Yuan Guo
{"title":"Multiparametric MRI Radiomics With Machine Learning for Differentiating HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Breast Cancer: Model Development, Testing, and Interpretability Analysis.","authors":"Yongxin Chen, Siyi Chen, Wenjie Tang, Qingcong Konge, Zhidan Zhong, Xiaomeng Yu, Yi Sui, Wenke Hu, Xinqing Jiang, Yuan Guo","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>BACKGROUND:</b> MRI radiomics has been explored for three-tiered classification of breast cancer HER2 expression (i.e., HER2-zero, HER2-low, or HER2-positive), although understanding of how such models reach their predictions is lacking. <b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To develop and test multiparametric MRI radiomics machine-learning models for differentiating three-tiered HER2 expression levels in patients with breast cancer, and to explain the contributions of model features through local and global interpretations using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis. <b>METHODS:</b> This retrospective study included 737 patients (mean age, 54.1±10.6 years) with breast cancer from two centers (center 1: n=578; center 2: n=159), who underwent breast MRI and had HER2 expression determined after excisional biopsy. Analysis entailed two tasks: differentiating HER2-negative (i.e., HER2-zero or HER2-low) from HER2-positive tumors (task 1), and differentiating HER2-zero from HER2-low tumors (task 2). For each task, patients from center 1 were randomly assigned in 7:3 ratio to training (task 1: n=405; task 2: n=284) or internal test (task 1: n=173; task 2: n=122) sets; those from center 2 formed an external test set (task 1: n=159; task 2: n=105). Radiomics features were extracted from early-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced images (DCE), T2-weighted images (T2WI), and DWI. For each task, a support vector machine (SVM) was used for feature selection; a multiparametric radiomics score (radscore) was computed using feature weights from SVM correlation coefficients; conventional MRI and combined models were constructed; and model performances were evaluated. SHAP analysis was used to provide local and global interpretations for model outputs. <b>RESULTS:</b> In the external test set, for task 1, AUCs for the conventional MRI model, radscore, and combined model were 0.624, 0.757, and 0.762, respectively; for task 2, AUC for radscore was 0.754, and no conventional MRI model or combined model could be constructed. SHAP analysis identified early-phase DCE features as having the strongest influence for both tasks; T2WI features also had a prominent role for task 2. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> The findings indicate suboptimal performance of MRI radiomics models for noninvasive characterization of HER2 expression. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT:</b> The study provides an example of the use of SHAP interpretation analysis to better understand predictions of imaging-based machine learning models.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI radiomics has been explored for three-tiered classification of breast cancer HER2 expression (i.e., HER2-zero, HER2-low, or HER2-positive), although understanding of how such models reach their predictions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test multiparametric MRI radiomics machine-learning models for differentiating three-tiered HER2 expression levels in patients with breast cancer, and to explain the contributions of model features through local and global interpretations using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis. METHODS: This retrospective study included 737 patients (mean age, 54.1±10.6 years) with breast cancer from two centers (center 1: n=578; center 2: n=159), who underwent breast MRI and had HER2 expression determined after excisional biopsy. Analysis entailed two tasks: differentiating HER2-negative (i.e., HER2-zero or HER2-low) from HER2-positive tumors (task 1), and differentiating HER2-zero from HER2-low tumors (task 2). For each task, patients from center 1 were randomly assigned in 7:3 ratio to training (task 1: n=405; task 2: n=284) or internal test (task 1: n=173; task 2: n=122) sets; those from center 2 formed an external test set (task 1: n=159; task 2: n=105). Radiomics features were extracted from early-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced images (DCE), T2-weighted images (T2WI), and DWI. For each task, a support vector machine (SVM) was used for feature selection; a multiparametric radiomics score (radscore) was computed using feature weights from SVM correlation coefficients; conventional MRI and combined models were constructed; and model performances were evaluated. SHAP analysis was used to provide local and global interpretations for model outputs. RESULTS: In the external test set, for task 1, AUCs for the conventional MRI model, radscore, and combined model were 0.624, 0.757, and 0.762, respectively; for task 2, AUC for radscore was 0.754, and no conventional MRI model or combined model could be constructed. SHAP analysis identified early-phase DCE features as having the strongest influence for both tasks; T2WI features also had a prominent role for task 2. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate suboptimal performance of MRI radiomics models for noninvasive characterization of HER2 expression. CLINICAL IMPACT: The study provides an example of the use of SHAP interpretation analysis to better understand predictions of imaging-based machine learning models.

利用机器学习的多参数 MRI 放射组学用于区分 HER2 零、低和阳性乳腺癌:模型开发、测试和可解释性分析。
背景:磁共振成像放射组学已被探索用于乳腺癌 HER2 表达的三级分类(即 HER2-零、HER2-低或 HER2-阳性),但人们对此类模型如何得出预测结果还缺乏了解。目的:开发并测试用于区分乳腺癌患者三级 HER2 表达水平的多参数 MRI 放射组学机器学习模型,并使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation(SHAP)分析法通过局部和全局解释模型特征的贡献。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了来自两个中心(中心1:578人;中心2:159人)的737名乳腺癌患者(平均年龄为54.1±10.6岁),这些患者接受了乳腺磁共振成像检查,并在切除活检后确定了HER2的表达。分析包括两项任务:区分HER2阴性(即HER2-0或HER2-低)和HER2阳性肿瘤(任务1),以及区分HER2-0和HER2-低肿瘤(任务2)。对于每项任务,中心1的患者按7:3的比例随机分配到训练集(任务1:n=405;任务2:n=284)或内部测试集(任务1:n=173;任务2:n=122);中心2的患者组成外部测试集(任务1:n=159;任务2:n=105)。放射组学特征从早期动态对比增强图像(DCE)、T2 加权图像(T2WI)和 DWI 中提取。每个任务都使用支持向量机(SVM)进行特征选择;使用 SVM 相关系数的特征权重计算多参数放射组学评分(radscore);构建传统 MRI 模型和组合模型;评估模型性能。使用 SHAP 分析为模型输出提供局部和全局解释。结果:在外部测试集中,对于任务 1,传统 MRI 模型、radscore 和组合模型的 AUC 分别为 0.624、0.757 和 0.762;对于任务 2,radscore 的 AUC 为 0.754,且无法构建传统 MRI 模型或组合模型。SHAP分析表明,早期DCE特征对这两项任务的影响最大;T2WI特征对任务2的影响也很显著。结论:研究结果表明,磁共振成像放射组学模型在表征 HER2 表达的非侵入性方面表现欠佳。临床影响:该研究提供了一个使用 SHAP 解释分析来更好地理解基于成像的机器学习模型预测的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信