Should I stay or should I go again: Multiple switching between fee-for-service Medicare and Medicare advantage among older beneficiaries.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Geoffrey J Hoffman, Yang Amy Jiao, Zhaohui Fan, H Myra Kim, Lillian Min, Donovan Maust
{"title":"Should I stay or should I go again: Multiple switching between fee-for-service Medicare and Medicare advantage among older beneficiaries.","authors":"Geoffrey J Hoffman, Yang Amy Jiao, Zhaohui Fan, H Myra Kim, Lillian Min, Donovan Maust","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether having previously disenrolled from Medicare Advantage (MA) is associated with lower hazards of future MA enrollment.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>Secondary data from Medicare.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We examined beneficiaries with baseline FFS enrollment from 2017-2019 using a 20% sample of Medicare claims. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of prior MA enrollment (in the three years prior to baseline FFS enrollment) with MA re-enrollment, and whether this association is modified by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), prior nursing home use, chronic illness, dual eligible status, and availability of MA plans and quality.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Overall, 3.3% of beneficiaries switched to MA annually. Of those with prior MA enrollment, MA switching percentages were 9.0%, 4.6%, and 6.8% for those whose most recent MA enrollments were 1, 2, and 3 years prior to their baseline FFS year. Comparatively, the switching percentages was 3.2% for those with no prior MA enrollment. The hazards of switching to MA were 2.73 (p < 0.001), 1.29 (p < 0.001), and 1.97 (p < 0.001) times greater than remaining in FFS for beneficiaries whose most recent MA enrollments were one, two, and three years prior to their baseline FFS year. Hazards of switching were generally similar between those with and without ADRD, stratified by recency in prior MA experience, except those with dual eligibility. Among those with ADRD, switching hazards were greatest for 3 years prior MA enrollees in counties with the fewest available (HR: 3.84, p < 0.001) and lowest-rated plans (HR: 4.02, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recency of switching from MA to FFS was the strongest predictor of a FFS-to-MA switch, identifying a population of beneficiaries who multiply switch regardless of health status or MA access. Future health policy considerations should more closely examine the vulnerabilities and long-term outcomes of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether having previously disenrolled from Medicare Advantage (MA) is associated with lower hazards of future MA enrollment.

Data sources and study setting: Secondary data from Medicare.

Study design: We examined beneficiaries with baseline FFS enrollment from 2017-2019 using a 20% sample of Medicare claims. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of prior MA enrollment (in the three years prior to baseline FFS enrollment) with MA re-enrollment, and whether this association is modified by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), prior nursing home use, chronic illness, dual eligible status, and availability of MA plans and quality.

Data collection: Not applicable.

Principal findings: Overall, 3.3% of beneficiaries switched to MA annually. Of those with prior MA enrollment, MA switching percentages were 9.0%, 4.6%, and 6.8% for those whose most recent MA enrollments were 1, 2, and 3 years prior to their baseline FFS year. Comparatively, the switching percentages was 3.2% for those with no prior MA enrollment. The hazards of switching to MA were 2.73 (p < 0.001), 1.29 (p < 0.001), and 1.97 (p < 0.001) times greater than remaining in FFS for beneficiaries whose most recent MA enrollments were one, two, and three years prior to their baseline FFS year. Hazards of switching were generally similar between those with and without ADRD, stratified by recency in prior MA experience, except those with dual eligibility. Among those with ADRD, switching hazards were greatest for 3 years prior MA enrollees in counties with the fewest available (HR: 3.84, p < 0.001) and lowest-rated plans (HR: 4.02, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Recency of switching from MA to FFS was the strongest predictor of a FFS-to-MA switch, identifying a population of beneficiaries who multiply switch regardless of health status or MA access. Future health policy considerations should more closely examine the vulnerabilities and long-term outcomes of this population.

我应该留下还是重新选择?老年受益人在付费医疗保险和医疗保险优势之间的多次转换。
目的评估曾退出医疗保险优势计划(MA)是否与未来加入医疗保险的较低风险相关:研究设计:我们使用 20% 的医疗保险索赔样本对 2017-2019 年基线 FFS 注册的受益人进行了研究。使用 Cox 比例危险模型来研究之前的医疗保险注册(基线 FFS 注册前三年内)与医疗保险重新注册之间的关联,以及这种关联是否会因阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)、之前使用养老院、慢性病、双重资格状态以及医疗保险计划的可用性和质量而改变:主要发现:总体而言,每年有 3.3% 的受益人转入医保。在曾经加入过医疗保险的受益人中,最近一次加入医疗保险的时间分别为基线 FFS 年之前的 1、2 和 3 年,其转入医疗保险的比例分别为 9.0%、4.6% 和 6.8%。相比之下,之前未加入医保者的转保比例为 3.2%。转为医保的危险度为 2.73(p 结论:转为医保的危险度为 2.73(p 结论:转为医保的危险度为 2.73(p 结论):从医疗保险转到全额医疗保险的时间是全额医疗保险转到医疗保险的最有力预测因素,这就确定了无论健康状况或医疗保险的可及性如何都会多次转保的受益人群体。未来的健康政策考虑应更密切地研究这一人群的脆弱性和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信