Racial and ethnic disparities in mental health among breast cancer patients and survivors in the United States.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ahmad Reshad Osmani, Asako Moriya, Shelley White-Means
{"title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in mental health among breast cancer patients and survivors in the United States.","authors":"Ahmad Reshad Osmani, Asako Moriya, Shelley White-Means","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To decompose the mental health disparities between breast cancer patients and survivors (hereafter survivors) of racial and ethnic minority groups and non-Hispanic White survivors into the contributions of individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and societal-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>We used data from the 2010-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC). Our primary outcome was whether the person had mental health conditions or not.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We employed the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder (KOB) method to understand to what extent the differences in outcomes were explained by the differences in the determinants between non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic breast cancer survivors and non-Hispanic White survivors. We also bifurcated the Hispanic sample analysis by the US-born status (and county of origin).</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>Confidential geographic identifiers are utilized to supplement the MEPS-HC data with information on community characteristics and local healthcare resources.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The prevalence of mental health conditions among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors was 26.1% (95% CI: 20.4, 31.7) and 28.3% (95% CI: 21.9, 34.6), respectively. These rates were higher than those for their non-Hispanic White counterparts, 19.7% (95% CI: 17.4, 21.9). In our KOB model, the disparity between non-Hispanic Black and White survivors was fully explained by differences in education, health, and family structure, with community- and societal-level determinants playing no significant role. Conversely, our KOB model did not explain any of the overall differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White survivors. However, for foreign-born Hispanic survivors, the disparity was fully explained by a combination of individual- and societal-level determinants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings, which identify specific individual-, interpersonal-, and societal- determinants that were associated with racial and ethnic differences in mental health, can be used by clinicians and policymakers to proactively address racial and ethnic disparities in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To decompose the mental health disparities between breast cancer patients and survivors (hereafter survivors) of racial and ethnic minority groups and non-Hispanic White survivors into the contributions of individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and societal-level determinants.

Data sources and study setting: We used data from the 2010-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC). Our primary outcome was whether the person had mental health conditions or not.

Study design: We employed the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder (KOB) method to understand to what extent the differences in outcomes were explained by the differences in the determinants between non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic breast cancer survivors and non-Hispanic White survivors. We also bifurcated the Hispanic sample analysis by the US-born status (and county of origin).

Data collection/extraction methods: Confidential geographic identifiers are utilized to supplement the MEPS-HC data with information on community characteristics and local healthcare resources.

Principal findings: The prevalence of mental health conditions among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic breast cancer survivors was 26.1% (95% CI: 20.4, 31.7) and 28.3% (95% CI: 21.9, 34.6), respectively. These rates were higher than those for their non-Hispanic White counterparts, 19.7% (95% CI: 17.4, 21.9). In our KOB model, the disparity between non-Hispanic Black and White survivors was fully explained by differences in education, health, and family structure, with community- and societal-level determinants playing no significant role. Conversely, our KOB model did not explain any of the overall differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White survivors. However, for foreign-born Hispanic survivors, the disparity was fully explained by a combination of individual- and societal-level determinants.

Conclusions: Our findings, which identify specific individual-, interpersonal-, and societal- determinants that were associated with racial and ethnic differences in mental health, can be used by clinicians and policymakers to proactively address racial and ethnic disparities in health.

美国乳腺癌患者和幸存者在心理健康方面的种族和民族差异。
目的将少数种族和少数族裔群体的乳腺癌患者和幸存者(以下简称幸存者)与非西班牙裔白人幸存者之间的心理健康差异分解为个人、人际、社区和社会层面的决定因素:我们使用了 2010-2020 年医疗支出小组调查家庭部分(MEPS-HC)的数据。研究设计:我们采用了北川-奥克斯(Kitagawa-Oax)研究方法:我们采用了北川-瓦哈卡-布林德(KOB)方法,以了解非西班牙裔黑人或西班牙裔乳腺癌幸存者与非西班牙裔白人幸存者之间的决定因素差异在多大程度上解释了结果差异。我们还按美国出生状况(和原籍县)对西班牙裔样本进行了分叉分析:数据收集/提取方法:利用保密的地理标识符对 MEPS-HC 数据进行补充,提供有关社区特征和当地医疗资源的信息:非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔乳腺癌幸存者的精神健康状况患病率分别为 26.1%(95% CI:20.4, 31.7)和 28.3%(95% CI:21.9, 34.6)。这些比率高于非西班牙裔白人的 19.7% (95% CI: 17.4, 21.9)。在我们的 KOB 模型中,非西班牙裔黑人和白人幸存者之间的差异完全可以用教育、健康和家庭结构的差异来解释,而社区和社会层面的决定因素则没有发挥重要作用。相反,我们的 KOB 模型无法解释西班牙裔幸存者和非西班牙裔白人幸存者之间的整体差异。然而,对于外国出生的西班牙裔幸存者来说,个人和社会层面的决定因素完全可以解释他们之间的差异:我们的研究结果确定了与种族和民族心理健康差异相关的特定个人、人际和社会决定因素,可供临床医生和政策制定者用于积极解决种族和民族健康差异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信