Efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer experiencing early vs late disease relapse after surgery: a large real-life worldwide population.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae256
Federica Lo Prinzi, Francesca Salani, Margherita Rimini, Mario Domenico Rizzato, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Silvia Camera, Tomoyuki Satake, Hanne Vandeputte, Caterina Vivaldi, Tiziana Pressiani, Jessica Lucchetti, Jin Won Kim, Oluseyi Abidoye, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, Stefano Tamberi, Fabian Finkelmeier, Guido Giordano, Chiara Pircher, Hong Jae Chon, Chiara Braconi, Alessandro Pastorino, Florian Castet, Emiliano Tamburini, Changhoon Yoo, Alessandro Parisi, Anna Diana, Mario Scartozzi, Gerald W Prager, Antonio Avallone, Marta Schirripa, Il Hwan Kim, Lukas Perkhofer, Ester Oneda, Monica Verrico, Jorge Adeva, Stephen L Chan, Gian Paolo Spinelli, Nicola Personeni, Ingrid Garajova, Maria Grazia Rodriquenz, Silvana Leo, Cecilia Melo Alvim, Ricardo Roque, Lorenzo Fornaro, Antonio De Rosa, Daniele Lavacchi, Federico Rossari, Masafumi Ikeda, Jeroen Dekervel, Monica Niger, Rita Balsano, Giuseppe Tonini, Minsu Kang, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Lucrezia Silvestro, Luca Esposito, Alessandra Boccaccino, Vera Himmelsbach, Matteo Landriscina, Selma Ahcene Djaballah, Valentina Zanuso, Gianluca Masi, Sara Lonardi, Lorenza Rimassa, Andrea Casadei-Gardini
{"title":"Efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer experiencing early vs late disease relapse after surgery: a large real-life worldwide population.","authors":"Federica Lo Prinzi, Francesca Salani, Margherita Rimini, Mario Domenico Rizzato, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Silvia Camera, Tomoyuki Satake, Hanne Vandeputte, Caterina Vivaldi, Tiziana Pressiani, Jessica Lucchetti, Jin Won Kim, Oluseyi Abidoye, Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli, Stefano Tamberi, Fabian Finkelmeier, Guido Giordano, Chiara Pircher, Hong Jae Chon, Chiara Braconi, Alessandro Pastorino, Florian Castet, Emiliano Tamburini, Changhoon Yoo, Alessandro Parisi, Anna Diana, Mario Scartozzi, Gerald W Prager, Antonio Avallone, Marta Schirripa, Il Hwan Kim, Lukas Perkhofer, Ester Oneda, Monica Verrico, Jorge Adeva, Stephen L Chan, Gian Paolo Spinelli, Nicola Personeni, Ingrid Garajova, Maria Grazia Rodriquenz, Silvana Leo, Cecilia Melo Alvim, Ricardo Roque, Lorenzo Fornaro, Antonio De Rosa, Daniele Lavacchi, Federico Rossari, Masafumi Ikeda, Jeroen Dekervel, Monica Niger, Rita Balsano, Giuseppe Tonini, Minsu Kang, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Lucrezia Silvestro, Luca Esposito, Alessandra Boccaccino, Vera Himmelsbach, Matteo Landriscina, Selma Ahcene Djaballah, Valentina Zanuso, Gianluca Masi, Sara Lonardi, Lorenza Rimassa, Andrea Casadei-Gardini","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the TOPAZ-1, patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) and recurrence within 6 months after surgery were excluded, even if this event is frequently observed in clinical practice. Our study aimed to assess if the efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab (CGD) in this population is comparable to that reported in the phase 3 trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included patients with BTC who underwent surgery on the primary tumor, experienced disease recurrence occurring ≤6 months or >6 months after surgery or after the end of adjuvant therapy and started CGD. The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed between early and late relapse groups in OS (23.4 months vs not reached; HR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.67-2.37; P = .45) and PFS [7.0 months vs 9.8 months; HR 1.3(95% CI, 0.9-2.1) P = .13]. Overall response rate and disease control rate (P = .33 and P = .62) were comparable between the 2 groups, as the overall safety profile. In addition, we compared survival outcomes between the selected population and a historical cohort of patients with BTC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) and found that despite the absence of statistical significance, CGD showed an outcome trend compared with CG regardless of the time of recurrence after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy [(CG ≤ 6 vs CGD ≤ 6 months: HR 0.59, 95%CI, 0.35-1.01, P = .05; HR 0.70; 95%CI, 0.46-1.06, P = .09, OS and PFS, respectively) and (CG > 6 vs. CGD > 6 months: HR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, P = 0.0165; HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.35-0.84, P = .0068, OS and PFS, respectively)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis suggests that CGD retains its efficacy independently of the timing of relapse after surgery or completion of adjuvant treatment in patients with advanced BTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the TOPAZ-1, patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) and recurrence within 6 months after surgery were excluded, even if this event is frequently observed in clinical practice. Our study aimed to assess if the efficacy of cisplatin-gemcitabine-durvalumab (CGD) in this population is comparable to that reported in the phase 3 trial.

Methods: The study cohort included patients with BTC who underwent surgery on the primary tumor, experienced disease recurrence occurring ≤6 months or >6 months after surgery or after the end of adjuvant therapy and started CGD. The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed between early and late relapse groups in OS (23.4 months vs not reached; HR 1.26; 95% CI, 0.67-2.37; P = .45) and PFS [7.0 months vs 9.8 months; HR 1.3(95% CI, 0.9-2.1) P = .13]. Overall response rate and disease control rate (P = .33 and P = .62) were comparable between the 2 groups, as the overall safety profile. In addition, we compared survival outcomes between the selected population and a historical cohort of patients with BTC treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) and found that despite the absence of statistical significance, CGD showed an outcome trend compared with CG regardless of the time of recurrence after surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy [(CG ≤ 6 vs CGD ≤ 6 months: HR 0.59, 95%CI, 0.35-1.01, P = .05; HR 0.70; 95%CI, 0.46-1.06, P = .09, OS and PFS, respectively) and (CG > 6 vs. CGD > 6 months: HR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, P = 0.0165; HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.35-0.84, P = .0068, OS and PFS, respectively)].

Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that CGD retains its efficacy independently of the timing of relapse after surgery or completion of adjuvant treatment in patients with advanced BTC.

顺铂-吉西他滨-德伐卢单抗对晚期胆道癌术后早期复发与晚期复发患者的疗效:一个全球范围内的大型真实人群。
背景:在TOPAZ-1试验中,胆道癌(BTC)患者和术后6个月内复发的患者被排除在外,尽管这种情况在临床实践中经常出现。我们的研究旨在评估顺铂-吉西他滨-杜维单抗(CGD)在这一人群中的疗效是否与三期试验报告的疗效相当:研究队列包括接受原发肿瘤手术、术后或辅助治疗结束后疾病复发≤6个月或>6个月并开始接受CGD治疗的BTC患者。主要目标是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS):结果:共有 178 名患者入组。早期复发组和晚期复发组在OS(23.4个月 vs 未达到;HR 1.26;95% CI,0.67-2.37;P = .45)和PFS(7.0个月 vs 9.8个月;HR 1.3(95% CI,0.9-2.1) P = .13)方面无明显差异。两组的总体反应率和疾病控制率(P = .33 和 P = .62)与总体安全性相当。此外,我们还比较了所选人群与接受顺铂-吉西他滨疗法(CG)治疗的 BTC 患者历史队列之间的生存结果,发现尽管没有统计学意义,但无论手术或辅助化疗后复发的时间长短,CGD 与 CG 相比都呈现出一种结果趋势[(CG ≤ 6 vs CGD ≤ 6 个月:HR 0.59,95%CI,0.35-1.01,P = .05;OS 和 PFS 分别为 HR 0.70;95%CI,0.46-1.06,P = .09)和(CG > 6 vs. CGD > 6 个月:HR 0.50; 95%CI, 0.29-0.88, P = 0.0165; HR 0.54; 95%CI, 0.35-0.84, P = .0068, OS and PFS, respectively)]:我们的分析表明,CGD在晚期BTC患者中的疗效与手术后或完成辅助治疗后的复发时间无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信