What do they look for and what do they find? A coproduced qualitative study on young people's experiences of searching for mental health information online.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
M E Loades, N Higson-Sweeney, B Teague, J Leas, C Payne-Cook, A V Slastikova, H Peel, G Chamberlain, L Ferguson, K Janes, T Rhodes, E C Roupa, L Biddle
{"title":"What do they look for and what do they find? A coproduced qualitative study on young people's experiences of searching for mental health information online.","authors":"M E Loades, N Higson-Sweeney, B Teague, J Leas, C Payne-Cook, A V Slastikova, H Peel, G Chamberlain, L Ferguson, K Janes, T Rhodes, E C Roupa, L Biddle","doi":"10.1111/papt.12550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many young people (YP) struggle with their mental health and look online for help. To capitalise on their digital presence, we need to better understand how and where they seek information online and what they think of what they find.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 24 YP (aged 13-18 years). Online interviews were co-conducted by research team members and trained young researchers. We presented a persona with depression symptoms and asked about potential sources of information/support they might seek. They were also asked to think aloud while searching online and reviewing mental health resources (NHS, Young Minds). We used reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis generated four themes: (1) the online help-seeking process, showcasing where YP look for information and why; (2) the mismatch between the information YP expected to find and the reality; (3) the strategies YP employed to determine a source's trust and credibility and (4) individual differences that can influence help-seeking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants initiated their online search by Googling symptoms. They trusted NHS websites for basic medical information, while charities provided detailed content. Despite scepticism about content, social media offered validation. Online resources should prioritise visual appeal, user-friendliness, age-appropriate and personalised content and peer insights. Codesign is imperative to ensure high-quality, impactful research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many young people (YP) struggle with their mental health and look online for help. To capitalise on their digital presence, we need to better understand how and where they seek information online and what they think of what they find.

Method: We recruited 24 YP (aged 13-18 years). Online interviews were co-conducted by research team members and trained young researchers. We presented a persona with depression symptoms and asked about potential sources of information/support they might seek. They were also asked to think aloud while searching online and reviewing mental health resources (NHS, Young Minds). We used reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Analysis generated four themes: (1) the online help-seeking process, showcasing where YP look for information and why; (2) the mismatch between the information YP expected to find and the reality; (3) the strategies YP employed to determine a source's trust and credibility and (4) individual differences that can influence help-seeking.

Conclusion: Participants initiated their online search by Googling symptoms. They trusted NHS websites for basic medical information, while charities provided detailed content. Despite scepticism about content, social media offered validation. Online resources should prioritise visual appeal, user-friendliness, age-appropriate and personalised content and peer insights. Codesign is imperative to ensure high-quality, impactful research.

他们在找什么,又找到了什么?关于年轻人在网上搜索心理健康信息的经历的共同定性研究。
背景:许多年轻人(YP)在心理健康问题上挣扎,并在网上寻求帮助。为了利用他们的数字影响力,我们需要更好地了解他们如何以及在哪里上网寻求信息,以及他们对所找到的信息的看法:我们招募了 24 名青少年(13-18 岁)。在线访谈由研究小组成员和经过培训的青年研究人员共同进行。我们向他们展示了一个有抑郁症状的角色,并询问他们可能寻求的信息/支持来源。我们还要求他们在网上搜索和查看心理健康资源(国家医疗服务系统、青年心灵)时大声思考。我们采用了反思性主题分析法:分析产生了四个主题:(1) 网上寻求帮助的过程,展示了青年在哪里以及为什么要寻找信息;(2) 青年期望找到的信息与现实之间的不匹配;(3) 青年为确定信息来源的信任度和可信度而采取的策略;(4) 可能影响寻求帮助的个体差异:参与者通过谷歌搜索症状开始在线搜索。他们信任国家医疗服务体系网站提供的基本医疗信息,而慈善机构则提供详细的内容。尽管他们对网站内容持怀疑态度,但社交媒体提供了验证。在线资源应优先考虑视觉吸引力、用户友好性、适合年龄和个性化的内容以及同龄人的见解。要确保高质量、有影响力的研究,规范设计是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信