Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Angiography in Iliac Branched Repair.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Roberta Vaccarino, Angelos Karelis, Bharti Singh, Elisabet Marinko, Kalliopi-Maria Tasopoulou, Timothy Resch, Björn Sonesson, Nuno V Dias
{"title":"Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Angiography in Iliac Branched Repair.","authors":"Roberta Vaccarino, Angelos Karelis, Bharti Singh, Elisabet Marinko, Kalliopi-Maria Tasopoulou, Timothy Resch, Björn Sonesson, Nuno V Dias","doi":"10.1177/15266028241289012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) angiography decreases the intraoperative use of iodine contrast medium (ICM), thereby decreasing the risk of developing postoperative renal damage in patients undergoing iliac branch device (IBD) implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing IBD implantation at a single tertiary center between May 2013 and August 2019 were screened for inclusion in the study. A cohort of patients in whom an intraoperative imaging protocol using predominantly CO<sub>2</sub> was compared with a control group in whom ICM was used (CO<sub>2</sub> and ICM groups). Fusion imaging was used in both groups. Retrospective review of the medical charts and all imaging was performed. Variables were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or absolute number and percentage. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. <i>P</i> values of <0 .05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients were included in the CO<sub>2</sub> group and 21 in the ICM group without significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Intraoperative iodine exposure was lower in the CO<sub>2</sub> group than in the ICM group (8.2 g [IQR, 7.1-10.9 g) vs 15.8 g (IQR 7.6-21 g); <i>P</i> = 0.015, respectively). There were no differences in technical success, clinical success, fluoroscopy time, and dose-area product in the 2 groups. There were no adverse events that could be related to the intraoperative use of CO<sub>2.</sub> There was no difference in postoperative survival nor renal function assessment between the groups despite the higher number of accessory renal arteries embolized in the CO<sub>2</sub> group (<i>P</i> = 0.221).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduction of intraoperative ICM exposure during IBD implantation is feasible through the predominant use of CO<sub>2</sub> automated angiography. This can be done safely without affecting the technical success or radiation exposure. The immediate postoperative renal damage was low when a modern intraoperative imaging protocol with ICM was used and was not significantly reduced by the use of CO<sub>2</sub>. Further and larger studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how to minimize intraoperative risk during iliac branched repair exploring the intraoperative use of automated carbon dioxide angiography in order to decrease the use of contrast media protecting renal function and thereby potentially impacting long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241289012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241289012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography decreases the intraoperative use of iodine contrast medium (ICM), thereby decreasing the risk of developing postoperative renal damage in patients undergoing iliac branch device (IBD) implantation.

Methods: Patients undergoing IBD implantation at a single tertiary center between May 2013 and August 2019 were screened for inclusion in the study. A cohort of patients in whom an intraoperative imaging protocol using predominantly CO2 was compared with a control group in whom ICM was used (CO2 and ICM groups). Fusion imaging was used in both groups. Retrospective review of the medical charts and all imaging was performed. Variables were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or absolute number and percentage. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and χ2 tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. P values of <0 .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Twenty-three patients were included in the CO2 group and 21 in the ICM group without significant differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Intraoperative iodine exposure was lower in the CO2 group than in the ICM group (8.2 g [IQR, 7.1-10.9 g) vs 15.8 g (IQR 7.6-21 g); P = 0.015, respectively). There were no differences in technical success, clinical success, fluoroscopy time, and dose-area product in the 2 groups. There were no adverse events that could be related to the intraoperative use of CO2. There was no difference in postoperative survival nor renal function assessment between the groups despite the higher number of accessory renal arteries embolized in the CO2 group (P = 0.221).

Conclusions: Reduction of intraoperative ICM exposure during IBD implantation is feasible through the predominant use of CO2 automated angiography. This can be done safely without affecting the technical success or radiation exposure. The immediate postoperative renal damage was low when a modern intraoperative imaging protocol with ICM was used and was not significantly reduced by the use of CO2. Further and larger studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects.

Clinical impact: This study aimed to investigate how to minimize intraoperative risk during iliac branched repair exploring the intraoperative use of automated carbon dioxide angiography in order to decrease the use of contrast media protecting renal function and thereby potentially impacting long-term survival.

髂支修复术中二氧化碳血管造影的碘评估
研究目的本研究旨在探讨二氧化碳(CO2)血管造影术的使用是否会减少碘造影剂(ICM)的术中使用,从而降低接受髂支装置(IBD)植入术的患者术后发生肾损伤的风险:研究筛选了 2013 年 5 月至 2019 年 8 月期间在一家三级医疗中心接受 IBD 植入术的患者。将主要使用 CO2 进行术中成像的患者队列与使用 ICM 的对照组(CO2 组和 ICM 组)进行比较。两组均使用融合成像。对病历和所有成像进行了回顾性审查。变量以中位数和四分位数间距 (IQR) 或绝对数和百分比表示。连续变量和分类变量的比较分别采用 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 检验和 χ2 检验。结果的 P 值:23 名患者被纳入 CO2 组,21 名患者被纳入 ICM 组,两组患者特征无明显差异。CO2 组术中碘暴露量低于 ICM 组(分别为 8.2 克 [IQR, 7.1-10.9 克] vs 15.8 克 (IQR 7.6-21 克);P = 0.015)。两组的技术成功率、临床成功率、透视时间和剂量-面积乘积均无差异。没有发生与术中使用二氧化碳有关的不良事件。尽管二氧化碳组栓塞的附属肾动脉数量较多(P = 0.221),但两组在术后存活率和肾功能评估方面没有差异:结论:在 IBD 植入术中,通过主要使用二氧化碳自动血管造影术减少术中 ICM 暴露是可行的。结论:在 IBD 植入术中,通过主要使用二氧化碳自动血管造影术,可以减少术中 ICM 暴露。使用 ICM 的现代术中成像方案时,术后即刻的肾损伤较低,而使用 CO2 并不会明显降低。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究,以调查其长期影响:本研究旨在探讨如何在髂支修复术中最大限度地降低术中风险,探索在术中使用自动二氧化碳血管造影术,以减少造影剂的使用,保护肾功能,从而对长期生存产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信