Mini-fragment Plate Fixation after Olecranon Osteotomy for Distal Humerus Fractures.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Patrick J Kellam, Adeet Amin, Ryan T Anthony, Augustine M Saiz, Blake J Schultz, Ryan R Mayer, Timothy S Achor, Stephen J Warner, Andrew M Choo
{"title":"Mini-fragment Plate Fixation after Olecranon Osteotomy for Distal Humerus Fractures.","authors":"Patrick J Kellam, Adeet Amin, Ryan T Anthony, Augustine M Saiz, Blake J Schultz, Ryan R Mayer, Timothy S Achor, Stephen J Warner, Andrew M Choo","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While olecranon osteotomies are helpful for distal humerus visualization, traditional methods of fixation are commonly irritating for patients and require hardware removal. Recent studies have shown lower hardware removal rates for medullary screw constructs and 3.5-mm plates, but no studies have investigated the use of 2.7-mm plates for olecranon osteotomy fixation. The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes of single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus intra-articular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who sustained an intra-articular distal humerus fracture, as identified by CPT codes, were reviewed retrospectively over a 5-year study period (2016-2020) at a single Level I trauma center after IRB approval. Only patients who underwent an olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus visualization during their definitive operation and that was subsequently fixed with a single 2.7-mm plate were included. Primary outcomes were implant removal and osteotomy union. Secondary outcomes included indications for implant removal, implant failure, infection, and revision surgery. Hardware removal rates were compared to historically reported rates in the literature. χ2 versus Fisher's exact tests were used to compare fixation groups based on number of patients in each cohort (5 or less was used for the cut-off for Fisher's exact test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD] 18), 58% (22 patients) were female, and there was an average follow-up time of 9.7 months (SD 5). All patients with mini-fragment plate fixation went on to union of their olecranon osteotomy. Three (7.8%) patients had their olecranon hardware removed for all causes: one for revision open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), one for irritation, and one removal during concomitant capsulectomy and manipulation. There was a 21% (8 patients) revision surgery rate in the cohort but only 3 of those were for issues related to the olecranon osteotomy. One patient required revision ORIF of the olecranon osteotomy for hardware loosening. Compared to other fixation constructs, mini-fragment plates had a lower removal rate than tension band wiring (P = 0.0002) and 3.5-mm plates (P = 0.05) and similar among medullary screws ± wires. Nonunion rates were similar between all constructs (P = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus fractures is safe and effective with low rates of revision, hardware removal, and nonunion. This type of fixation should be considered when treating intra-articular distal humerus fractures that require an olecranon osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While olecranon osteotomies are helpful for distal humerus visualization, traditional methods of fixation are commonly irritating for patients and require hardware removal. Recent studies have shown lower hardware removal rates for medullary screw constructs and 3.5-mm plates, but no studies have investigated the use of 2.7-mm plates for olecranon osteotomy fixation. The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes of single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus intra-articular fractures.

Methods: Patients who sustained an intra-articular distal humerus fracture, as identified by CPT codes, were reviewed retrospectively over a 5-year study period (2016-2020) at a single Level I trauma center after IRB approval. Only patients who underwent an olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus visualization during their definitive operation and that was subsequently fixed with a single 2.7-mm plate were included. Primary outcomes were implant removal and osteotomy union. Secondary outcomes included indications for implant removal, implant failure, infection, and revision surgery. Hardware removal rates were compared to historically reported rates in the literature. χ2 versus Fisher's exact tests were used to compare fixation groups based on number of patients in each cohort (5 or less was used for the cut-off for Fisher's exact test).

Results: 38 patients were included in the final analysis. The average age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD] 18), 58% (22 patients) were female, and there was an average follow-up time of 9.7 months (SD 5). All patients with mini-fragment plate fixation went on to union of their olecranon osteotomy. Three (7.8%) patients had their olecranon hardware removed for all causes: one for revision open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), one for irritation, and one removal during concomitant capsulectomy and manipulation. There was a 21% (8 patients) revision surgery rate in the cohort but only 3 of those were for issues related to the olecranon osteotomy. One patient required revision ORIF of the olecranon osteotomy for hardware loosening. Compared to other fixation constructs, mini-fragment plates had a lower removal rate than tension band wiring (P = 0.0002) and 3.5-mm plates (P = 0.05) and similar among medullary screws ± wires. Nonunion rates were similar between all constructs (P = 0.07).

Conclusion: Single 2.7-mm mini-fragment plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies for distal humerus fractures is safe and effective with low rates of revision, hardware removal, and nonunion. This type of fixation should be considered when treating intra-articular distal humerus fractures that require an olecranon osteotomy.

肱骨远端骨折外髁截骨术后的微型骨片固定术
目的:尽管肘骨截骨术有助于肱骨远端可视化,但传统的固定方法通常会刺激患者,而且需要去除硬件。最近的研究表明,髓质螺钉结构和 3.5 毫米钢板的硬件移除率较低,但还没有研究对使用 2.7 毫米钢板进行肩胛骨截骨固定进行调查。本研究的目的是报告肱骨远端关节内骨折的肩胛骨截骨单一 2.7 毫米微型钢板固定的结果:根据 CPT 代码确定的肱骨远端关节内骨折患者,经 IRB 批准后,在一家一级创伤中心对 5 年研究期间(2016-2020 年)的患者进行回顾性研究。只有在最终手术中接受了肱骨远端可视化截骨术并随后使用单块 2.7 毫米钢板固定的患者才被纳入研究范围。主要结果是植入物移除和截骨结合。次要结果包括植入物移除适应症、植入物失败、感染和翻修手术。硬件移除率与文献中的历史报告率进行了比较。采用χ2检验和费雪精确检验,根据每组患者的人数比较固定组(费雪精确检验的临界值为5人或5人以下):38名患者被纳入最终分析。平均年龄为 50 岁(标准差 [SD] 18),58%(22 名患者)为女性,平均随访时间为 9.7 个月(标准差 5)。所有接受迷你片段钢板固定的患者的肩胛骨截骨后都达到了骨结合。有三位患者(7.8%)因各种原因拆除了肩胛骨硬件:一位患者因翻修开放复位内固定术(ORIF)而拆除,一位患者因刺激而拆除,还有一位患者在同时进行骨帽切除术和手法治疗时拆除。队列中的翻修手术率为21%(8名患者),但其中只有3例是因为与肩胛骨截骨术相关的问题。一名患者因硬件松动需要进行肩胛骨截骨翻修手术。与其他固定结构相比,迷你片状钢板的移除率低于张力带接线(P = 0.0002)和3.5毫米钢板(P = 0.05),与髓质螺钉±接线相似。所有结构的不愈合率相似(P = 0.07):结论:对肱骨远端骨折进行单块2.7毫米微型钢板固定是安全有效的,翻修率、硬件移除率和不愈合率都很低。在治疗需要进行肩胛骨截骨的肱骨远端关节内骨折时,应考虑采用这种固定方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信