Early Postoperative Pain is Similar after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair versus Short-Stay Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ryan Lopez, Corey Schiffman, Jaspal Singh, Jie Yao, Alayna Vaughan, Raymond Chen, Mark Lazarus, Surena Namdari
{"title":"Early Postoperative Pain is Similar after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair versus Short-Stay Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Ryan Lopez, Corey Schiffman, Jaspal Singh, Jie Yao, Alayna Vaughan, Raymond Chen, Mark Lazarus, Surena Namdari","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One of the barriers to counseling patients for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is the anticipated pain after surgery. This can be contrasted with the common perception of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery being less painful due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. We conducted a prospective study comparing postoperative pain levels and narcotic consumption after SA compared to those after RCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 102 patients undergoing short-stay SA and RCR at a single hospital. 50 patients underwent RCR and 52 underwent SA. All participants received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine and one of two oral pain medication regimens. Patients were provided a daily pain diary to be completed for 14 postoperative days that tracked pain levels, narcotic consumption, and pain location. Patients were excluded for age <40, revision surgery, SA for fracture, history of chronic opioid use, or an inability to adhere to study protocol. Demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were collected preoperatively. Primary study outcomes were daily VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption during the 14 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RCR patients were younger (60.6 vs. 68.9 years; p<0.01) but other demographics, preoperative pain, and PSQ scores were similar between groups. Peak mean VAS pain levels for RCR and SA each occurred on postoperative (POD) 2 and were 4.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 2.7 respectively (p=0.214). There was no significant difference in VAS pain during the 14-day postoperative period between RCR and SA patients (p>0.05) or between anatomic SA and reverse SA (p>0.05). Narcotic usage was greater for RCR patients at POD 7 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.039) and 8 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.015) compared to SA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that postoperative pain levels do not significantly differ between RCR and short-stay SA, with greater narcotic usage observed for RCR at one week after surgery. These findings support the notion that despite the increased invasiveness of SA, early postoperative pain is comparable with early pain after RCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One of the barriers to counseling patients for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is the anticipated pain after surgery. This can be contrasted with the common perception of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery being less painful due to the less invasive nature of the procedure. We conducted a prospective study comparing postoperative pain levels and narcotic consumption after SA compared to those after RCR.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled 102 patients undergoing short-stay SA and RCR at a single hospital. 50 patients underwent RCR and 52 underwent SA. All participants received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of an interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine and one of two oral pain medication regimens. Patients were provided a daily pain diary to be completed for 14 postoperative days that tracked pain levels, narcotic consumption, and pain location. Patients were excluded for age <40, revision surgery, SA for fracture, history of chronic opioid use, or an inability to adhere to study protocol. Demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and pain sensitivity questionnaires (PSQ) were collected preoperatively. Primary study outcomes were daily VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption during the 14 days after surgery.

Results: RCR patients were younger (60.6 vs. 68.9 years; p<0.01) but other demographics, preoperative pain, and PSQ scores were similar between groups. Peak mean VAS pain levels for RCR and SA each occurred on postoperative (POD) 2 and were 4.4 ± 3.1 and 5.1 ± 2.7 respectively (p=0.214). There was no significant difference in VAS pain during the 14-day postoperative period between RCR and SA patients (p>0.05) or between anatomic SA and reverse SA (p>0.05). Narcotic usage was greater for RCR patients at POD 7 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.039) and 8 (0.5 vs. 0.2 tablets; p=0.015) compared to SA patients.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that postoperative pain levels do not significantly differ between RCR and short-stay SA, with greater narcotic usage observed for RCR at one week after surgery. These findings support the notion that despite the increased invasiveness of SA, early postoperative pain is comparable with early pain after RCR.

关节镜下肩袖修复术与短期肩关节置换术术后早期疼痛相似:一项前瞻性研究。
导言:咨询患者进行肩关节置换术(SA)的障碍之一是术后的预期疼痛。人们普遍认为关节镜下肩袖修复(RCR)手术的创伤性较小,因此术后疼痛较轻,这与此形成了鲜明对比。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较了 SA 术后与 RCR 术后的疼痛程度和麻醉剂用量:这项前瞻性研究招募了 102 名在一家医院接受短期 SA 和 RCR 手术的患者。50 名患者接受了 RCR,52 名患者接受了 SA。所有参与者都接受了多模式止痛方案,包括使用脂质体布比卡因的椎间孔阻滞和两种口服止痛药方案中的一种。患者在术后 14 天内每天填写疼痛日记,记录疼痛程度、麻醉剂用量和疼痛部位。患者因年龄原因被排除在外:RCR患者更年轻(60.6岁对68.9岁;P0.05),或介于解剖SA和反向SA之间(P>0.05)。与SA患者相比,RCR患者在POD 7(0.5片对0.2片;P=0.039)和POD 8(0.5片对0.2片;P=0.015)时的麻醉剂用量更大:我们的研究表明,RCR 和短期住院 SA 患者的术后疼痛程度并无明显差异,但术后一周内 RCR 患者的麻醉剂用量更大。这些研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即尽管SA的侵入性增加,但术后早期疼痛与RCR术后早期疼痛相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信