Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Japanese Version of Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001292
Gen Aikawa, Mitsuki Ikeda, Ayako Fukushima, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Michiko Uchi, Nobutake Shimojo
{"title":"Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Japanese Version of Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised.","authors":"Gen Aikawa, Mitsuki Ikeda, Ayako Fukushima, Hideaki Sakuramoto, Akira Ouchi, Michiko Uchi, Nobutake Shimojo","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Healthcare workers involved in, and negatively affected by, patient safety incidents are referred to as second victims. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised (SVEST-R) can reveal the second victim's degree of negative experiences and the desirability of the support options. However, a Japanese version of the SVEST-R (J-SVESTR) has not yet been developed. This study aimed to translate and adapt the SVEST-R into Japanese and validate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed forward and back translations of the SVEST-R and evaluated its clarity and content validity. Subsequently, we administered a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to evaluate the construct validity, internal consistency, and retest reliability of the J-SVESTR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The J-SVESTR was finalized with clarity and content validity supported by a pilot test and an expert panel. In total, 224 healthcare workers responded to the J-SVESTR survey. The 9 factors and 35 items model indicated an acceptable fit (χ 2 / df = 1.811, root mean square error of approximation = 0.060, comparative fit index = 0.871, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.854, standardized root mean squared residual = 0.077). Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.68 to 0.85. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The J-SVESTR retained 9 factors and 35 items, with no item changes from the original. The psychometric properties of the J-SVESTR are acceptable. The J-SVESTR can help investigate the actual situation and desired support options for second victims in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Healthcare workers involved in, and negatively affected by, patient safety incidents are referred to as second victims. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool-Revised (SVEST-R) can reveal the second victim's degree of negative experiences and the desirability of the support options. However, a Japanese version of the SVEST-R (J-SVESTR) has not yet been developed. This study aimed to translate and adapt the SVEST-R into Japanese and validate its psychometric properties.

Methods: We performed forward and back translations of the SVEST-R and evaluated its clarity and content validity. Subsequently, we administered a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to evaluate the construct validity, internal consistency, and retest reliability of the J-SVESTR.

Results: The J-SVESTR was finalized with clarity and content validity supported by a pilot test and an expert panel. In total, 224 healthcare workers responded to the J-SVESTR survey. The 9 factors and 35 items model indicated an acceptable fit (χ 2 / df = 1.811, root mean square error of approximation = 0.060, comparative fit index = 0.871, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.854, standardized root mean squared residual = 0.077). Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.68 to 0.85. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 0.87.

Conclusions: The J-SVESTR retained 9 factors and 35 items, with no item changes from the original. The psychometric properties of the J-SVESTR are acceptable. The J-SVESTR can help investigate the actual situation and desired support options for second victims in Japan.

第二次受害者经历和支持工具-修订版》日文版的翻译、改编和验证。
目的:参与患者安全事件并受到负面影响的医护人员被称为第二受害者。第二受害者体验与支持工具修订版(SVEST-R)可以揭示第二受害者的负面体验程度以及支持选项的可取性。然而,SVEST-R 的日语版本(J-SVESTR)尚未开发。本研究旨在将 SVEST-R 翻译和改编成日语,并验证其心理测量特性:我们对 SVEST-R 进行了正向和反向翻译,并对其清晰度和内容效度进行了评估。随后,我们进行了一项横断面问卷调查,以评估 J-SVESTR 的建构效度、内部一致性和重测信度:结果:J-SVESTR 最终定稿,其清晰度和内容有效性得到了试点测试和专家组的支持。共有 224 名医护人员参与了 J-SVESTR 调查。9 个因子和 35 个条目模型的拟合度可以接受(χ2/df = 1.811,均方根近似误差 = 0.060,比较拟合指数 = 0.871,塔克-刘易斯指数 = 0.854,标准化均方根残差 = 0.077)。Cronbach's α 值介于 0.68 和 0.85 之间。类内相关系数在 0.63 至 0.87 之间:J-SVESTR 保留了 9 个因子和 35 个项目,与原来的项目相比没有变化。J-SVESTR 的心理测量特性是可以接受的。J-SVESTR 可以帮助调查日本二次伤害受害者的实际情况和期望的支持方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信