Learning by Visualize a Nurse-Led CCOS Using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sabine Adriana Johanna Josepha Op 't Hoog, Mariëlle van Mersbergen-de Bruin, Nikki Laurina Mathilda Damen, Wendy Chaboyer, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen, Anne M Eskes, Lilian Christina Maria Vloet, Hester Vermeulen
{"title":"Learning by Visualize a Nurse-Led CCOS Using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.","authors":"Sabine Adriana Johanna Josepha Op 't Hoog, Mariëlle van Mersbergen-de Bruin, Nikki Laurina Mathilda Damen, Wendy Chaboyer, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen, Anne M Eskes, Lilian Christina Maria Vloet, Hester Vermeulen","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality improvements (QIs) in dynamic and complex health care contexts require resilience and take variability into account in quality improvement. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) helps us understand resilience and gain insight into (un)desirable variability in the complex system of daily practice. We explored how using FRAM in the Deming cycle of a QI project can help professionals and researchers learn from, reflect upon, and improve complex processes. We used FRAM in a Dutch hospital to study a QI: Critical Care Outreach Service (CCOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim was to use FRAM before and after implementation to create a FRAM model and reflect to health care professionals the mismatch between Work As Imagined (WAI) and Work As Done (WAD). The WAI FRAM model was co-created with professionals before the implementation of CCOS. We used descriptions of tasks and processes for ICU nurses and verified them in 30-minute semistructured interviews (N = 2). WAD was created by input of semistructured interviews with key professionals in CCOS (N = 21) and 3 nonparticipant observations of trained CCOS nurses. We validated WAD in 2 dialogue sessions with key professionals (N = 11). Data collection continued until saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Juxtaposing the WAI and WAD models showed that WAD contained additional functions and highlighted unexpectedly complex functions. Reflecting on the application of FRAM with health care professionals revealed opportunities and challenges, especially time investment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FRAM helps professionals outline processes and tasks (WAI), learn from, and reflect upon their daily practice (WAD). FRAM models help professionals identify variability proactively to improve practices that enhance resilient performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Quality improvements (QIs) in dynamic and complex health care contexts require resilience and take variability into account in quality improvement. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) helps us understand resilience and gain insight into (un)desirable variability in the complex system of daily practice. We explored how using FRAM in the Deming cycle of a QI project can help professionals and researchers learn from, reflect upon, and improve complex processes. We used FRAM in a Dutch hospital to study a QI: Critical Care Outreach Service (CCOS).

Methods: The aim was to use FRAM before and after implementation to create a FRAM model and reflect to health care professionals the mismatch between Work As Imagined (WAI) and Work As Done (WAD). The WAI FRAM model was co-created with professionals before the implementation of CCOS. We used descriptions of tasks and processes for ICU nurses and verified them in 30-minute semistructured interviews (N = 2). WAD was created by input of semistructured interviews with key professionals in CCOS (N = 21) and 3 nonparticipant observations of trained CCOS nurses. We validated WAD in 2 dialogue sessions with key professionals (N = 11). Data collection continued until saturation.

Results: Juxtaposing the WAI and WAD models showed that WAD contained additional functions and highlighted unexpectedly complex functions. Reflecting on the application of FRAM with health care professionals revealed opportunities and challenges, especially time investment.

Conclusions: FRAM helps professionals outline processes and tasks (WAI), learn from, and reflect upon their daily practice (WAD). FRAM models help professionals identify variability proactively to improve practices that enhance resilient performance.

使用功能共振分析法,通过可视化护士主导的 CCOS 学习。
目标:在动态和复杂的医疗保健环境中,质量改进(QIs)需要适应力,并在质量改进中考虑到可变性。功能共振分析法(FRAM)可以帮助我们理解复原力,并深入了解日常实践的复杂系统中(不)理想的变异性。我们探讨了在质量改进项目的戴明周期中使用 FRAM 如何帮助专业人员和研究人员从复杂的流程中学习、反思和改进。我们在一家荷兰医院使用 FRAM 研究了一项 QI:重症监护外展服务(CCOS):方法:目的是在实施前后使用 FRAM 建立 FRAM 模型,并向医护人员反映想象中的工作(WAI)与实际完成的工作(WAD)之间的不匹配。在实施 CCOS 之前,我们与专业人员共同创建了 WAI FRAM 模型。我们使用了重症监护室护士的任务和流程描述,并在 30 分钟的半结构式访谈中进行了验证(N = 2)。通过对 CCOS 主要专业人员(21 人)进行半结构式访谈,以及对经过培训的 CCOS 护士进行 3 次非参与式观察,我们创建了 WAD。我们在与主要专业人员(11 人)的两次对话中验证了 WAD。数据收集一直持续到饱和为止:将 WAI 和 WAD 模型并列显示,WAD 包含额外的功能,并突出了意想不到的复杂功能。与医护专业人员一起反思 FRAM 的应用,发现了机遇和挑战,尤其是时间投入:FRAM 帮助专业人员概述流程和任务(WAI),从日常实践中学习并反思(WAD)。FRAM 模型可帮助专业人员积极主动地识别可变性,从而改进实践,提高复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信