Factors associated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation for rheumatoid arthritis in underserved patient groups in England and Wales, UK: a national cohort study.

IF 15 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mark D Russell, Mark Gibson, Benjamin Zuckerman, Kanta Kumar, Shirish Dubey, Maryam A Adas, Edward Alveyn, Samir Patel, Zijing Yang, Katie Bechman, Elizabeth Price, Sarah Gallagher, Andrew P Cope, Sam Norton, James B Galloway
{"title":"Factors associated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation for rheumatoid arthritis in underserved patient groups in England and Wales, UK: a national cohort study.","authors":"Mark D Russell, Mark Gibson, Benjamin Zuckerman, Kanta Kumar, Shirish Dubey, Maryam A Adas, Edward Alveyn, Samir Patel, Zijing Yang, Katie Bechman, Elizabeth Price, Sarah Gallagher, Andrew P Cope, Sam Norton, James B Galloway","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00221-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantifying health-care inequality is essential to addressing the imbalance in outcomes attributable to age, sex, race or ethnicity, and multimorbidity. In this study, we analysed differences in the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within the universal health-care system of England and Wales, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted using the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) dataset. We included all patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were enrolled in NEIAA between May 8, 2018, and April 30, 2022, and who had 12-month follow-up data available. Modified Poisson regression was used to explore factors associated with the initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment. The factors evaluated included age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (index of multiple deprivation), smoking status, and relevant comorbidities (lung disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and depression). NEIAA is supported by people with lived experience of rheumatoid arthritis, who contributed to study design and the interpretation of findings.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>6098 patients in NEIAA had new diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis and available follow-up data. The mean age was 59·2 years (SD 14·9); 3912 (64·2%) patients were women and 2186 (35·8%) were men. 6047 (99·2%) patients had available ethnicity data, of whom 5215 (86·2%) were White, 152 (2·5%) were Black, 478 (7·9%) were Asian, and 202 (3·3%) were of mixed or other ethnicities. 508 (8·3%) of 6098 patients initiated biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months. Patients younger than 40 years were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than individuals older than 65 years (multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 2·41 [95% CI 1·83-3·19]; p<0·0001). Asian individuals were less likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (0·52 [0·36-0·76]; p=0·0007), which persisted after adjustment for socioeconomic status, comorbidities, baseline disease severity, and the initial response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. These differences were evident for Asian women but not Asian men. Black individuals were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (1·54 [1·10-2·16]; p=0·012), which became non-significant after adjusting for baseline disease severity and autoantibody status.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs for patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis varies markedly by ethnicity and age in the universal health-care system of England and Wales. This study demonstrates the importance of providing tailored information and ensuring equitable access to high-quality care for underserved patient groups. The one-size-fits-all approach must be reconsidered if health disparities are to be mitigated effectively.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Sandoz UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00221-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantifying health-care inequality is essential to addressing the imbalance in outcomes attributable to age, sex, race or ethnicity, and multimorbidity. In this study, we analysed differences in the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within the universal health-care system of England and Wales, UK.

Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted using the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) dataset. We included all patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were enrolled in NEIAA between May 8, 2018, and April 30, 2022, and who had 12-month follow-up data available. Modified Poisson regression was used to explore factors associated with the initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months of initial rheumatology assessment. The factors evaluated included age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (index of multiple deprivation), smoking status, and relevant comorbidities (lung disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and depression). NEIAA is supported by people with lived experience of rheumatoid arthritis, who contributed to study design and the interpretation of findings.

Findings: 6098 patients in NEIAA had new diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis and available follow-up data. The mean age was 59·2 years (SD 14·9); 3912 (64·2%) patients were women and 2186 (35·8%) were men. 6047 (99·2%) patients had available ethnicity data, of whom 5215 (86·2%) were White, 152 (2·5%) were Black, 478 (7·9%) were Asian, and 202 (3·3%) were of mixed or other ethnicities. 508 (8·3%) of 6098 patients initiated biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs within 12 months. Patients younger than 40 years were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than individuals older than 65 years (multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 2·41 [95% CI 1·83-3·19]; p<0·0001). Asian individuals were less likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (0·52 [0·36-0·76]; p=0·0007), which persisted after adjustment for socioeconomic status, comorbidities, baseline disease severity, and the initial response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. These differences were evident for Asian women but not Asian men. Black individuals were more likely to be initiated on biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs than White individuals (1·54 [1·10-2·16]; p=0·012), which became non-significant after adjusting for baseline disease severity and autoantibody status.

Interpretation: The initiation of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs for patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis varies markedly by ethnicity and age in the universal health-care system of England and Wales. This study demonstrates the importance of providing tailored information and ensuring equitable access to high-quality care for underserved patient groups. The one-size-fits-all approach must be reconsidered if health disparities are to be mitigated effectively.

Funding: Sandoz UK.

英国英格兰和威尔士服务不足的类风湿关节炎患者群体开始使用生物和靶向合成修饰疾病抗风湿药物的相关因素:一项全国队列研究。
背景:量化医疗保健的不平等对于解决因年龄、性别、种族或民族以及多病导致的结果不平衡问题至关重要。在这项研究中,我们分析了英国英格兰和威尔士全民医疗系统中类风湿性关节炎患者开始使用生物或靶向合成改良抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的差异:利用全国早期炎症性关节炎审计(NEIAA)数据集开展了一项观察性队列研究。我们纳入了所有在2018年5月8日至2022年4月30日期间加入NEIAA且有12个月随访数据的类风湿关节炎患者。我们采用了修正泊松回归法来探讨与初次风湿病学评估后 12 个月内开始使用生物和靶向合成 DMARDs 相关的因素。评估的因素包括年龄、性别、种族、社会经济状况(多重贫困指数)、吸烟状况和相关合并症(肺病、心血管疾病、癌症和抑郁症)。NEIAA 得到了类风湿关节炎患者的支持,他们参与了研究设计和结果解释:在 NEIAA 的 6098 名患者中,有新确诊的类风湿关节炎患者和可用的随访数据。平均年龄为 59-2 岁(SD 14-9);3912 名(64-2%)患者为女性,2186 名(35-8%)患者为男性。6047名(99-2%)患者有可用的种族数据,其中5215名(86-2%)为白人,152名(2-5%)为黑人,478名(7-9%)为亚洲人,202名(3-3%)为混血或其他种族。6098名患者中有508人(8-3%)在12个月内开始使用生物和靶向合成DMARDs。与 65 岁以上的患者相比,40 岁以下的患者更有可能开始使用生物和靶向合成 DMARDs(多变量调整风险比为 2-41 [95% CI 1-83-3-19];P解释:在英格兰和威尔士的全民医疗保健系统中,新确诊类风湿关节炎患者开始使用生物和靶向合成DMARDs的情况因种族和年龄的不同而存在明显差异。这项研究表明,为医疗服务不足的患者群体提供量身定制的信息并确保其公平获得高质量的医疗服务非常重要。如果要有效缓解健康差异,就必须重新考虑 "一刀切 "的方法:英国山德士公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Rheumatology
Lancet Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials. With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信