Occupational therapists' perspectives on welfare technologies for dementia: exploring recommendation frequencies - a pilot study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Antonios Tsertsidis, Gideon Mbiydzenyuy
{"title":"Occupational therapists' perspectives on welfare technologies for dementia: exploring recommendation frequencies - a pilot study.","authors":"Antonios Tsertsidis, Gideon Mbiydzenyuy","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2412785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational therapists have long been recognized for their expertise in welfare technology use, particularly in the context of dementia care. Despite this advanced training, however, there is often a gap between their knowledge of available technologies and the frequency with which they recommend these tools to individuals with dementia.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>This study explores the perspectives of occupational therapists on the recommendations of welfare technologies for individuals with dementia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey was created with the assistance of an expert group in a Swedish municipality. The survey consisted of 26 questions (demographics, background/workload, perceptions of welfare technologies, accessibility/information and knowledge on how and when to use, and initiation of contact and recommendation frequency) and was distributed to 60 occupational therapists within the selected municipality. We received a total of 29 responses. The responses were then analyzed qualitatively for meaningful insights across various themes. Using an encoding scheme, a statistical analysis of the responses was performed to uncover potential trends in the distribution of the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate positive perceptions of welfare technologies by occupational therapists, but a low frequency of recommendations for individuals with dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Based on the results, we find it important to advocate for more educational opportunities for occupational therapists regarding welfare technologies and improved organizational structures that promote their understanding and ultimately benefits of recommending welfare technologies to individuals with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2412785","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational therapists have long been recognized for their expertise in welfare technology use, particularly in the context of dementia care. Despite this advanced training, however, there is often a gap between their knowledge of available technologies and the frequency with which they recommend these tools to individuals with dementia.

Aims/objectives: This study explores the perspectives of occupational therapists on the recommendations of welfare technologies for individuals with dementia.

Materials and methods: A survey was created with the assistance of an expert group in a Swedish municipality. The survey consisted of 26 questions (demographics, background/workload, perceptions of welfare technologies, accessibility/information and knowledge on how and when to use, and initiation of contact and recommendation frequency) and was distributed to 60 occupational therapists within the selected municipality. We received a total of 29 responses. The responses were then analyzed qualitatively for meaningful insights across various themes. Using an encoding scheme, a statistical analysis of the responses was performed to uncover potential trends in the distribution of the responses.

Results: Results indicate positive perceptions of welfare technologies by occupational therapists, but a low frequency of recommendations for individuals with dementia.

Conclusions and significance: Based on the results, we find it important to advocate for more educational opportunities for occupational therapists regarding welfare technologies and improved organizational structures that promote their understanding and ultimately benefits of recommending welfare technologies to individuals with dementia.

职业治疗师对痴呆症福利技术的看法:探索建议频率--一项试点研究。
背景:长期以来,职业治疗师因其在福利技术使用方面的专业知识而受到认可,尤其是在痴呆症护理方面。然而,尽管职业治疗师接受过高级培训,但他们对现有技术的了解程度与向痴呆症患者推荐这些工具的频率之间往往存在差距:本研究探讨了职业治疗师对向痴呆症患者推荐福利技术的看法:在瑞典某市专家组的协助下制作了一份调查问卷。调查由 26 个问题组成(人口统计学、背景/工作量、对福利技术的看法、可获得性/信息、关于如何使用和何时使用的知识、开始联系和推荐频率),并分发给选定城市的 60 名职业治疗师。我们共收到 29 份回复。然后,我们对这些答复进行了定性分析,以获得对不同主题的有意义的见解。使用编码方案对答复进行统计分析,以发现答复分布的潜在趋势:结果表明,职业治疗师对福利技术的看法是积极的,但向痴呆症患者推荐福利技术的频率较低:基于上述结果,我们认为有必要倡导为职业治疗师提供更多有关福利技术的教育机会,并改善组织结构,以促进他们对福利技术的理解,最终使他们能够从向痴呆症患者推荐福利技术中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信