An Ethics Consult Documentation Simplification Project: Summation of Participatory Processes, User Perceptions, and Subsequent Use Patterns.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Meaghann S Weaver, Anita J Tarzian, Hannah N Hester, Karinne R Davidson, Rodney P Dismukes, Mary Beth Foglia
{"title":"An Ethics Consult Documentation Simplification Project: Summation of Participatory Processes, User Perceptions, and Subsequent Use Patterns.","authors":"Meaghann S Weaver, Anita J Tarzian, Hannah N Hester, Karinne R Davidson, Rodney P Dismukes, Mary Beth Foglia","doi":"10.1007/s10730-024-09537-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare ethics consultants in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) document consults in an enterprise-wide web-based database entitled IEWeb, serving as a system of record for healthcare ethics documentation at 1300 VA facilities. The need arose to evolve the database from an ethics process training resource into a more streamlined documentation repository that captures essential consult elements. A VHA National Center for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC) Improvement Team convened for three tasks: (1) Specify and prioritize IEWeb changes (occurred via six focus groups composed of \"new user\" and \"super user\" cohorts with analysis of existing documentation patterns); (2) Pilot the changes regionally (via regional communication, training, and reviews of pre-post use patterns); and (3) Measure the impact of national change implementation on user perspectives (via pre-and post-change implementation polls). Focus groups identified six implementable priority areas for ethics consult documentation improvement, including the development of a usable consult summary note for ready conversion from IEWeb fields into the electronic health record. Post-IEWeb updates showed an increased number of consults documented, a reduction in \"time to consult documentation closure\" by a mean of 4.5 days, and a clinically-meaningful improvement in the quality of documentation (78% of ethics questions scored \"above-bar\" on the validation tool pre- vs. 89% scored \"above-bar\" post-IEWeb changes, n = 140). According to national survey findings, the number of consultants documenting \"all\" consults in IEWeb increased, satisfaction increased, and perception of documentation difficulty decreased. IEWeb simplification enabled ethics consultants to re-focus their documentation completion efforts by decreasing perception of documentation burden while improving documentation frequency and quality in a clinically-meaningful way.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-024-09537-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare ethics consultants in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) document consults in an enterprise-wide web-based database entitled IEWeb, serving as a system of record for healthcare ethics documentation at 1300 VA facilities. The need arose to evolve the database from an ethics process training resource into a more streamlined documentation repository that captures essential consult elements. A VHA National Center for Ethics in Health Care (NCEHC) Improvement Team convened for three tasks: (1) Specify and prioritize IEWeb changes (occurred via six focus groups composed of "new user" and "super user" cohorts with analysis of existing documentation patterns); (2) Pilot the changes regionally (via regional communication, training, and reviews of pre-post use patterns); and (3) Measure the impact of national change implementation on user perspectives (via pre-and post-change implementation polls). Focus groups identified six implementable priority areas for ethics consult documentation improvement, including the development of a usable consult summary note for ready conversion from IEWeb fields into the electronic health record. Post-IEWeb updates showed an increased number of consults documented, a reduction in "time to consult documentation closure" by a mean of 4.5 days, and a clinically-meaningful improvement in the quality of documentation (78% of ethics questions scored "above-bar" on the validation tool pre- vs. 89% scored "above-bar" post-IEWeb changes, n = 140). According to national survey findings, the number of consultants documenting "all" consults in IEWeb increased, satisfaction increased, and perception of documentation difficulty decreased. IEWeb simplification enabled ethics consultants to re-focus their documentation completion efforts by decreasing perception of documentation burden while improving documentation frequency and quality in a clinically-meaningful way.

伦理咨询文件简化项目:对参与过程、用户感知和后续使用模式的总结。
退伍军人健康管理局 (VHA) 的医疗保健伦理顾问在名为 IEWeb 的企业级网络数据库中记录咨询,该数据库是 1300 个退伍军人健康管理局设施的医疗保健伦理文件记录系统。该数据库需要从伦理流程培训资源发展成为一个更精简的文档库,以捕捉基本的咨询要素。退伍军人事务部国家医疗保健伦理中心(NCEHC)改进小组召集了一次会议,以完成三项任务:(1)明确 IEWeb 更改的具体内容和优先次序(通过由 "新用户 "和 "超级用户 "组成的六个焦点小组进行,并对现有文档模式进行分析);(2)在地区范围内试行更改(通过地区沟通、培训和对使用前和使用后模式的审查);以及(3)衡量全国性更改实施对用户观点的影响(通过更改实施前和实施后民意调查)。焦点小组确定了伦理会诊文件改进的六个可实施的优先领域,包括开发可用的会诊摘要说明,以便随时从 IEWeb 字段转换到电子病历中。IEWeb 更新后,记录的会诊次数增加,"会诊记录结束时间 "平均缩短了 4.5 天,记录质量也得到了有临床意义的提高(IEWeb 更改前,78% 的伦理问题在验证工具上得分 "高于标准";IEWeb 更改后,89% 的伦理问题得分 "高于标准",n = 140)。根据全国性的调查结果,在 IEWeb 中记录 "所有 "咨询的顾问人数增加了,满意度提高了,对记录难度的认识降低了。IEWeb 的简化使道德顾问能够重新关注他们的文档完成工作,减少了他们对文档负担的感知,同时以一种对临床有意义的方式提高了文档频率和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信