Student supervision by trainee doctors in GP teaching practices: Win-win situation or additional burden? An interview study on current practices and acceptance.

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001701
Sabine Gehrke-Beck, Ulrike Sonntag, Tomke Schubert, Mariyan Madzharov, Bert Huenges
{"title":"Student supervision by trainee doctors in GP teaching practices: Win-win situation or additional burden? An interview study on current practices and acceptance.","authors":"Sabine Gehrke-Beck, Ulrike Sonntag, Tomke Schubert, Mariyan Madzharov, Bert Huenges","doi":"10.3205/zma001701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Teaching by trainee doctors is also established practice in general practice in English-speaking countries. This study examines the involvement of trainee doctors in the supervision of students in German general practices and the acceptance of trainee doctors as teachers from the perspective of physicians with a license for post-graduate training (PLT) and the trainee doctors themselves.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 9 PLTs and 9 trainees. The interview guide was developed based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptance. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and evaluated using Kuckartz's qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trainee doctors are involved in student supervision in GP teaching practices to varying degrees and often in unstructured ways. Supervision by trainees is considered advantageous as they are closer in terms of hierarchy, possess more up-to-date knowledge and are less far ahead in terms of knowledge and function as role models. However, professional uncertainty or revealing knowledge gaps to patients and students is experienced as difficult by some trainees. Competing for time with patient care is seen as a challenge. Better time planning and didactic preparation could avoid pressure in this area. Teaching is seen as part of the GP profession, especially by trainee doctors. However, a potential obligation to teach is seen as more of a hindrance to encouraging the next generation of doctors by both trainee doctors and PLTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The inclusion of trainee doctors in student teaching is frequently practiced by those surveyed, which suggests a high level of acceptance but is not consistently implemented. Structured organization of teaching in real life, didactic qualifications and offering credits for teaching activities might further improve inclusion and acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":"41 4","pages":"Doc46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Teaching by trainee doctors is also established practice in general practice in English-speaking countries. This study examines the involvement of trainee doctors in the supervision of students in German general practices and the acceptance of trainee doctors as teachers from the perspective of physicians with a license for post-graduate training (PLT) and the trainee doctors themselves.

Methodology: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 9 PLTs and 9 trainees. The interview guide was developed based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptance. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and evaluated using Kuckartz's qualitative analysis.

Results: Trainee doctors are involved in student supervision in GP teaching practices to varying degrees and often in unstructured ways. Supervision by trainees is considered advantageous as they are closer in terms of hierarchy, possess more up-to-date knowledge and are less far ahead in terms of knowledge and function as role models. However, professional uncertainty or revealing knowledge gaps to patients and students is experienced as difficult by some trainees. Competing for time with patient care is seen as a challenge. Better time planning and didactic preparation could avoid pressure in this area. Teaching is seen as part of the GP profession, especially by trainee doctors. However, a potential obligation to teach is seen as more of a hindrance to encouraging the next generation of doctors by both trainee doctors and PLTs.

Conclusion: The inclusion of trainee doctors in student teaching is frequently practiced by those surveyed, which suggests a high level of acceptance but is not consistently implemented. Structured organization of teaching in real life, didactic qualifications and offering credits for teaching activities might further improve inclusion and acceptance.

实习医生在全科医生教学实践中指导学生:双赢局面还是额外负担?关于当前做法和接受程度的访谈研究。
目的:在英语国家的全科诊所中,实习医生进行教学也是一种惯例。本研究从持有研究生培训许可证(PLT)的医生和实习医生自身的角度,探讨了德国全科医生中实习医生参与指导学生的情况,以及实习医生作为教师的接受程度:对 9 名研究生培训师和 9 名实习医生进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈指南是根据 "接受理论框架 "制定的。采用库卡茨定性分析法对访谈进行记录、转录和评估:结果:见习医生在不同程度上参与了全科医生教学实践中的学生督导工作,而且往往是以非结构化的方式进行的。受训医生的指导被认为是有利的,因为他们在等级制度方面更接近,掌握更多最新知识,在知识方面不那么遥遥领先,并能起到榜样作用。然而,一些受训人员认为,专业上的不确定性或向病人和学生揭示知识差距是困难的。与病人护理争夺时间也被视为一项挑战。更好的时间规划和教学准备可以避免这方面的压力。教学被视为全科医生职业的一部分,尤其是在见习医生中。然而,受训医生和 PLT 都认为潜在的教学义务更多的是对鼓励下一代医生的一种阻碍:结论:受访者经常将见习医生纳入学生教学中,这表明见习医生的接受程度很高,但并没有得到持续实施。在现实生活中组织有序的教学、颁发教学资格证书以及为教学活动提供学分可能会进一步提高包容性和接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信