Safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel device to monitor ischaemic stroke patients.

Q3 Engineering
Samuel J van Bohemen, Jeffrey M Rogers, Aleksandra Alavanja, Andrew Evans, Noel Young, Philip C Boughton, Joaquin T Valderrama, Andre Z Kyme
{"title":"Safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel device to monitor ischaemic stroke patients.","authors":"Samuel J van Bohemen, Jeffrey M Rogers, Aleksandra Alavanja, Andrew Evans, Noel Young, Philip C Boughton, Joaquin T Valderrama, Andre Z Kyme","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2024.2409115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel device to monitor ischaemic stroke patients. The device captured electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) data to compute an ECG-based metric, termed the Electrocardiography Brain Perfusion index (EBPi), which may function as a proxy for cerebral blood flow (CBF). Seventeen ischaemic stroke patients wore the device for nine hours and reported feedback at 1, 3, 6 and 9 h regarding user experience, comfort, and satisfaction (acceptability). Safety was assessed as the number of adverse events reported. Feasibility was assessed as the percentage of uninterrupted EEG/ECG data recorded (data capture efficiency). No adverse events were reported, only minor incidences of discomfort. Overall device comfort (mean ± 1 standard deviation (<i>SD</i>) (range)) (92.5% ± 10.3% (57.0-100%)) and data capture efficiency (mean ± 1 <i>SD</i> (range)) (95.8% ± 6.8% (54.8-100%)) were very high with relatively low variance. The device didn't restrict participants from receiving clinical care and rarely (<i>n</i> = 6) restricted participants from undertaking routine tasks. This study provides a promising evidence base for the deployment of the device in a clinical setting. If clinically validated, EBPi may be able to detect CBF changes to monitor early neurological deterioration and treatment outcomes, thus filling an important gap in current monitoring options.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000112763).</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2024.2409115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel device to monitor ischaemic stroke patients. The device captured electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) data to compute an ECG-based metric, termed the Electrocardiography Brain Perfusion index (EBPi), which may function as a proxy for cerebral blood flow (CBF). Seventeen ischaemic stroke patients wore the device for nine hours and reported feedback at 1, 3, 6 and 9 h regarding user experience, comfort, and satisfaction (acceptability). Safety was assessed as the number of adverse events reported. Feasibility was assessed as the percentage of uninterrupted EEG/ECG data recorded (data capture efficiency). No adverse events were reported, only minor incidences of discomfort. Overall device comfort (mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD) (range)) (92.5% ± 10.3% (57.0-100%)) and data capture efficiency (mean ± 1 SD (range)) (95.8% ± 6.8% (54.8-100%)) were very high with relatively low variance. The device didn't restrict participants from receiving clinical care and rarely (n = 6) restricted participants from undertaking routine tasks. This study provides a promising evidence base for the deployment of the device in a clinical setting. If clinically validated, EBPi may be able to detect CBF changes to monitor early neurological deterioration and treatment outcomes, thus filling an important gap in current monitoring options.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622000112763).

监测缺血性中风患者的新型设备的安全性、可行性和可接受性。
本研究评估了用于监测缺血性中风患者的新型设备的安全性、可行性和可接受性。该设备采集脑电图(EEG)和心电图(ECG)数据,计算基于心电图的指标,称为心电图脑灌注指数(EBPi),可作为脑血流量(CBF)的替代指标。17 名缺血性中风患者佩戴该设备 9 小时,并在 1、3、6 和 9 小时时报告有关用户体验、舒适度和满意度(可接受性)的反馈。安全性以报告的不良事件数量进行评估。可行性根据记录的不间断脑电图/心电图数据的百分比(数据捕获效率)进行评估。无不良事件报告,仅有轻微不适感。设备的总体舒适度(平均 ± 1 个标准差 (SD) (范围))(92.5% ± 10.3% (57.0-100%))和数据捕获效率(平均 ± 1 个标准差 (SD) (范围))(95.8% ± 6.8% (54.8-100%))非常高,差异相对较小。该设备没有限制参与者接受临床护理,也很少(n = 6)限制参与者执行常规任务。这项研究为该设备在临床环境中的应用提供了可靠的证据基础。如果经过临床验证,EBPi 可能能够检测 CBF 变化,监测早期神经功能恶化和治疗效果,从而填补当前监测方案的重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信