POLYETHYLENE WEAR IN METAL-BACKED TIBIAL COMPONENTS IN UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESES.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Navnit S Makaram, Liam Z Yapp, Abigail L W Bowley, Amy Garner, Chloe E H Scott
{"title":"POLYETHYLENE WEAR IN METAL-BACKED TIBIAL COMPONENTS IN UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE PROSTHESES.","authors":"Navnit S Makaram, Liam Z Yapp, Abigail L W Bowley, Amy Garner, Chloe E H Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased worldwide and has become a favorable alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated single compartment knee osteoarthritis. With the increase in UKA utilization, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The two most common causes of revision include the progression of osteoarthritis in other compartments and aseptic loosening with polyethylene wear, periprosthetic fracture, bearing dislocation, infection, instability, and unexplained pain being other causes. This narrative review will provide an overview of the current literature related to polyethylene wear-related implant failure in UKA. The evolution of the UKA implant design and the important differences in wear biomechanics, survival, and clinical outcomes between metal-backed (MB), all polyethylene (AP), fixed-bearing (FB), and mobile-bearing (MoB) MB tibial components will be discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased worldwide and has become a favorable alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated single compartment knee osteoarthritis. With the increase in UKA utilization, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The two most common causes of revision include the progression of osteoarthritis in other compartments and aseptic loosening with polyethylene wear, periprosthetic fracture, bearing dislocation, infection, instability, and unexplained pain being other causes. This narrative review will provide an overview of the current literature related to polyethylene wear-related implant failure in UKA. The evolution of the UKA implant design and the important differences in wear biomechanics, survival, and clinical outcomes between metal-backed (MB), all polyethylene (AP), fixed-bearing (FB), and mobile-bearing (MoB) MB tibial components will be discussed.

单隔间膝关节假体中金属支撑胫骨组件的聚乙烯磨损。
单室膝关节置换术(UKA)在全球范围内的使用率越来越高,已成为孤立单室膝关节骨性关节炎患者全膝关节置换术的有利替代方案。随着UKA使用率的增加,翻修次数也随之增加。翻修的两个最常见原因包括其他部位骨关节炎的进展和无菌性松动,其他原因还包括聚乙烯磨损、假体周围骨折、轴承脱位、感染、不稳定和不明原因的疼痛。本综述将概述目前与UKA聚乙烯磨损相关的植入失败相关的文献。将讨论UKA植入物设计的演变,以及金属支撑(MB)、全聚乙烯(AP)、固定支撑(FB)和移动支撑(MoB)MB胫骨组件在磨损生物力学、存活率和临床结果方面的重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信