Danielle C Kimble, Tracy J Litzi, Gabrielle Snyder, Victoria Olowu, Sakiyah TaQee, Kelly A Conrads, Jeremy Loffredo, Nicholas W Bateman, Camille Alba, Elizabeth Rice, Craig D Shriver, George L Maxwell, Clifton Dalgard, Thomas P Conrads
{"title":"A modified dual preparatory method for improved isolation of nucleic acids from laser microdissected fresh-frozen human cancer tissue specimens.","authors":"Danielle C Kimble, Tracy J Litzi, Gabrielle Snyder, Victoria Olowu, Sakiyah TaQee, Kelly A Conrads, Jeremy Loffredo, Nicholas W Bateman, Camille Alba, Elizabeth Rice, Craig D Shriver, George L Maxwell, Clifton Dalgard, Thomas P Conrads","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A central theme in cancer research is to increase our understanding of the cancer tissue microenvironment, which is comprised of a complex and spatially heterogeneous ecosystem of malignant and non-malignant cells, both of which actively contribute to an intervening extracellular matrix. Laser microdissection (LMD) enables histology selective harvest of cellular subpopulations from the tissue microenvironment for their independent molecular investigation, such as by high-throughput DNA and RNA sequencing. Although enabling, LMD often requires a labor-intensive investment to harvest enough cells to achieve the necessary DNA and/or RNA input requirements for conventional next-generation sequencing workflows. To increase efficiencies, we sought to use a commonplace dual preparatory (DP) procedure to isolate DNA and RNA from the same LMD harvested tissue samples. While the yield of DNA from the DP protocol was satisfactory, the RNA yield from the LMD harvested tissue samples was significantly poorer compared to a dedicated RNA preparation procedure. We determined that this low yield of RNA was due to incomplete partitioning of RNA in this widely used DP protocol. Here, we describe a modified DP protocol that more equally partitions nucleic acids and results in significantly improved RNA yields from LMD-harvested cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpae066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A central theme in cancer research is to increase our understanding of the cancer tissue microenvironment, which is comprised of a complex and spatially heterogeneous ecosystem of malignant and non-malignant cells, both of which actively contribute to an intervening extracellular matrix. Laser microdissection (LMD) enables histology selective harvest of cellular subpopulations from the tissue microenvironment for their independent molecular investigation, such as by high-throughput DNA and RNA sequencing. Although enabling, LMD often requires a labor-intensive investment to harvest enough cells to achieve the necessary DNA and/or RNA input requirements for conventional next-generation sequencing workflows. To increase efficiencies, we sought to use a commonplace dual preparatory (DP) procedure to isolate DNA and RNA from the same LMD harvested tissue samples. While the yield of DNA from the DP protocol was satisfactory, the RNA yield from the LMD harvested tissue samples was significantly poorer compared to a dedicated RNA preparation procedure. We determined that this low yield of RNA was due to incomplete partitioning of RNA in this widely used DP protocol. Here, we describe a modified DP protocol that more equally partitions nucleic acids and results in significantly improved RNA yields from LMD-harvested cells.