Rebozo and advanced maternal postures: A promising set of intrapartum interventions to reduce persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/191511
Simona Fumagalli, Laura Antolini, Antonella Nespoli, Maria Panzeri, Teresa Terenghi, Simona Ferrini, Roberta Spandrio, Isabella Marzia Maini, Anna Locatelli, Sara Ornaghi
{"title":"Rebozo and advanced maternal postures: A promising set of intrapartum interventions to reduce persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head.","authors":"Simona Fumagalli, Laura Antolini, Antonella Nespoli, Maria Panzeri, Teresa Terenghi, Simona Ferrini, Roberta Spandrio, Isabella Marzia Maini, Anna Locatelli, Sara Ornaghi","doi":"10.18332/ejm/191511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinning Babies® procedures and the Rebozo technique have been recently implemented as additional interventions in laboring women with a fetus in occiput posterior position (OPP) to favor the rotation to an anterior position, which improve birth experience and health outcomes. Our study aimed to compare the probability of occurrence of persistent OPP (POPP) of the fetal head at the second stage of labor between retrospective and prospective cohorts and to assess associated sociodemographic, obstetric and intrapartum factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a combined prospective and retrospective cohort study including 1500 women giving birth in 2017 (retrospective cohort) and 779 between 15 May and 15 December 2023 (prospective cohort). Each cohort was divided into two sub-cohorts depending on presence of OPP. Primary outcomes were compared the probability of occurrence of POPP in the two OPP sub-cohorts by a log binomial regression and logistic regression. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using Stata/MP18.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of OPP at the onset of labor was similar between the two cohorts (34.9% vs 35.1%). The probability of occurrence of POPP was significantly lower in the prospective OPP sub-cohort (27.7%, n=65/235) compared to the retrospective OPP sub-cohort (35.8%, n=154/430) (risk difference, RD= -0.081; 95% CI: -0.15 - -0.008; p=0.031). In the retrospective OPP sub-cohort, maternal age ≥35 years (RD=0.096; 95% CI: 0.001-0.190, p=0.044) and nulliparity (RD= -0.100; 95% CI: -0.190 - -0.001, p=0.036) were significantly associated with the probability of POPP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a potential benefit of a set of interventions combining Spinning Babies® and the Rebozo technique in decreasing the probability of POPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/191511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinning Babies® procedures and the Rebozo technique have been recently implemented as additional interventions in laboring women with a fetus in occiput posterior position (OPP) to favor the rotation to an anterior position, which improve birth experience and health outcomes. Our study aimed to compare the probability of occurrence of persistent OPP (POPP) of the fetal head at the second stage of labor between retrospective and prospective cohorts and to assess associated sociodemographic, obstetric and intrapartum factors.

Methods: We conducted a combined prospective and retrospective cohort study including 1500 women giving birth in 2017 (retrospective cohort) and 779 between 15 May and 15 December 2023 (prospective cohort). Each cohort was divided into two sub-cohorts depending on presence of OPP. Primary outcomes were compared the probability of occurrence of POPP in the two OPP sub-cohorts by a log binomial regression and logistic regression. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using Stata/MP18.0.

Results: The proportion of OPP at the onset of labor was similar between the two cohorts (34.9% vs 35.1%). The probability of occurrence of POPP was significantly lower in the prospective OPP sub-cohort (27.7%, n=65/235) compared to the retrospective OPP sub-cohort (35.8%, n=154/430) (risk difference, RD= -0.081; 95% CI: -0.15 - -0.008; p=0.031). In the retrospective OPP sub-cohort, maternal age ≥35 years (RD=0.096; 95% CI: 0.001-0.190, p=0.044) and nulliparity (RD= -0.100; 95% CI: -0.190 - -0.001, p=0.036) were significantly associated with the probability of POPP.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest a potential benefit of a set of interventions combining Spinning Babies® and the Rebozo technique in decreasing the probability of POPP.

Rebozo 和产妇高级姿势:一套很有前景的产前干预措施,可减少胎儿头部持续枕后位。
简介Spinning Babies®手术和Rebozo技术最近已作为额外干预措施应用于胎儿枕后位(OPP)的产妇,以促进胎儿旋转至前位,从而改善分娩体验和健康结果。我们的研究旨在比较回顾性队列和前瞻性队列中第二产程胎头持续枕后位(POPP)发生的概率,并评估相关的社会人口、产科和产期因素:我们进行了一项前瞻性和回顾性队列合并研究,包括 1500 名 2017 年分娩的产妇(回顾性队列)和 779 名 2023 年 5 月 15 日至 12 月 15 日分娩的产妇(前瞻性队列)。每个队列根据是否存在OPP分为两个子队列。主要结果是通过对数二项式回归和逻辑回归比较两个 OPP 子队列中发生 POPP 的概率。A p结果:两个队列在临产时的 OPP 比例相似(34.9% vs 35.1%)。与回顾性 OPP 亚队列(35.8%,n=154/430)相比,前瞻性 OPP 亚队列(27.7%,n=65/235)发生 POPP 的概率明显较低(风险差异,RD= -0.081; 95% CI: -0.15 -0.008; p=0.031)。在回顾性 OPP 亚队列中,孕产妇年龄≥35 岁(RD=0.096;95% CI:0.001-0.190,p=0.044)和无排卵(RD= -0.100;95% CI:-0.190 -0.001,p=0.036)与发生 POPP 的概率显著相关:我们的研究结果表明,将 Spinning Babies® 和 Rebozo 技术相结合的一套干预措施在降低 POPP 发生概率方面具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信