Developing a large-scale quality improvement program for thyroid cancer surgery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Catherine B Jensen, Elizabeth M Bacon, Lauren N Krumeich, Hunter J Underwood, David T Hughes, Paul G Gauger, Richard Burney, Susan C Pitt
{"title":"Developing a large-scale quality improvement program for thyroid cancer surgery.","authors":"Catherine B Jensen, Elizabeth M Bacon, Lauren N Krumeich, Hunter J Underwood, David T Hughes, Paul G Gauger, Richard Burney, Susan C Pitt","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical quality improvement (QI) plays a critical role in optimizing patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. QI programs focusing specifically on thyroid cancer surgical care are lacking. This study aimed to (a) select and introduce surgical quality indicators for thyroid cancer and (b) identify areas for QI at the state-level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team of thyroid cancer and QI experts selected 10 thyroid cancer-specific quality indicators and assessed the quality of thyroid cancer surgical care compared to current national guidelines. Analysis of the first year (January-December 2023) of data collection was performed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thyroid cancer quality indicators included preoperative cytology, postoperative pathology, staging, cancer size, margin status, extrathyroidal extension, lymph nodes, postoperative complications within 30 days, documented follow-up treatment, and documented surveillance plans. 112 surgeons performed 360 thyroidectomies for thyroid cancer at 51 hospitals. Preoperative cytology was not performed in 34.3% (n = 103) of cases with thyroid cancer on final pathology. When the extent of surgery was evaluated by papillary cancer size, 50.0% (n = 38) of patients with <1 cm cancers underwent total thyroidectomy, and 13.8% (n = 4) with >4 cm underwent thyroid lobectomy. Positive margins were found in 16.2% (n = 53). Postoperatively, 19.2% (n = 69) of patients lacked documented follow-up, and 18.6% (n = 67) lacked thyroid cancer surveillance plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing a dedicated QI program for thyroid cancer provides a previously unharnessed opportunity to enhance the quality of thyroid cancer surgical care. Statewide surgical quality collaboratives offer a model for establishing thyroid cancer QI initiatives across diverse healthcare settings in other states and countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical quality improvement (QI) plays a critical role in optimizing patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. QI programs focusing specifically on thyroid cancer surgical care are lacking. This study aimed to (a) select and introduce surgical quality indicators for thyroid cancer and (b) identify areas for QI at the state-level.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team of thyroid cancer and QI experts selected 10 thyroid cancer-specific quality indicators and assessed the quality of thyroid cancer surgical care compared to current national guidelines. Analysis of the first year (January-December 2023) of data collection was performed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The thyroid cancer quality indicators included preoperative cytology, postoperative pathology, staging, cancer size, margin status, extrathyroidal extension, lymph nodes, postoperative complications within 30 days, documented follow-up treatment, and documented surveillance plans. 112 surgeons performed 360 thyroidectomies for thyroid cancer at 51 hospitals. Preoperative cytology was not performed in 34.3% (n = 103) of cases with thyroid cancer on final pathology. When the extent of surgery was evaluated by papillary cancer size, 50.0% (n = 38) of patients with <1 cm cancers underwent total thyroidectomy, and 13.8% (n = 4) with >4 cm underwent thyroid lobectomy. Positive margins were found in 16.2% (n = 53). Postoperatively, 19.2% (n = 69) of patients lacked documented follow-up, and 18.6% (n = 67) lacked thyroid cancer surveillance plans.

Conclusions: Establishing a dedicated QI program for thyroid cancer provides a previously unharnessed opportunity to enhance the quality of thyroid cancer surgical care. Statewide surgical quality collaboratives offer a model for establishing thyroid cancer QI initiatives across diverse healthcare settings in other states and countries.

为甲状腺癌手术制定大规模质量改进计划。
背景:手术质量改进(QI)在优化患者治疗效果和降低医疗成本方面发挥着至关重要的作用。目前还缺乏专门针对甲状腺癌手术治疗的 QI 项目。本研究旨在:(a)选择并引入甲状腺癌手术质量指标;(b)确定州一级的 QI 领域:一个由甲状腺癌和质量改进专家组成的多学科小组选择了 10 项甲状腺癌特定质量指标,并对照现行国家指南评估了甲状腺癌手术治疗的质量。采用描述性统计方法对第一年(2023 年 1 月至 12 月)的数据收集情况进行分析:甲状腺癌质量指标包括术前细胞学、术后病理学、分期、癌症大小、边缘状态、甲状腺外扩展、淋巴结、术后30天内的并发症、有记录的后续治疗以及有记录的监控计划。51家医院的112名外科医生为甲状腺癌患者实施了360例甲状腺切除术。在最终病理结果为甲状腺癌的病例中,34.3%(n = 103)的病例未进行术前细胞学检查。根据乳头状癌的大小评估手术范围时,50.0%(n = 38)的 4 厘米患者接受了甲状腺叶切除术。16.2%的患者(53人)发现边缘阳性。术后,19.2%(n = 69)的患者缺乏随访记录,18.6%(n = 67)的患者缺乏甲状腺癌监测计划:结论:建立专门的甲状腺癌质量改进计划为提高甲状腺癌手术治疗质量提供了一个前所未有的机会。全州范围内的手术质量合作项目为其他州和国家在不同的医疗环境中建立甲状腺癌质量改进项目提供了范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信