Treating neonatal intestinal obstruction with ostomy in continuity: a single-center comparative study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-246
Yanmin Zhang, Wei Gao, Wei Zuo, Chen Yu
{"title":"Treating neonatal intestinal obstruction with ostomy in continuity: a single-center comparative study.","authors":"Yanmin Zhang, Wei Gao, Wei Zuo, Chen Yu","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an array of surgical modalities available to treat neonatal intestinal obstruction, but there is no consensus on the optimal method. The study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ostomy in continuity (OIC), providing a reference for surgeons to determine the appropriate surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 46 neonates with intestinal obstruction hospitalized between June 2019 and February 2024. The types of intestinal injuries included in the study comprised atresia, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), meconium ileus and volvulus. Based on their surgical procedures, patients were divided into the OIC group and the control group. General information, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18 patients underwent OIC, and 28 patients underwent double-barrel or single-barrel enterostomies. There were no statistically significant differences between patients in the two groups in terms of general information, duration of the ostomy surgery (P=0.66), bleeding volume (P=0.25), length of post-ostomy hospital stay (P=0.08), and time to first defecation after surgery (P=0.23). Compared to the control group, neonates in the OIC group had a shorter duration of parenteral nutrition (P=0.02), a shorter interval between stoma creation and closure surgeries (P=0.02), a shorter duration of stoma closure surgery (P<0.001), and fewer postoperative complications (P<0.001). The weight-for-age Z-score before the stoma closure surgery was better in the OIC group than the control group (P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found that OIC, as a treatment for neonatal intestinal obstruction, was effective in maintaining intestinal continuity, improving the nutritional status of neonates, and shortening the interval between the stoma creation and closure surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"13 9","pages":"1600-1607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an array of surgical modalities available to treat neonatal intestinal obstruction, but there is no consensus on the optimal method. The study aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ostomy in continuity (OIC), providing a reference for surgeons to determine the appropriate surgical approach.

Methods: The study involved a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 46 neonates with intestinal obstruction hospitalized between June 2019 and February 2024. The types of intestinal injuries included in the study comprised atresia, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), meconium ileus and volvulus. Based on their surgical procedures, patients were divided into the OIC group and the control group. General information, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups.

Results: There were 18 patients underwent OIC, and 28 patients underwent double-barrel or single-barrel enterostomies. There were no statistically significant differences between patients in the two groups in terms of general information, duration of the ostomy surgery (P=0.66), bleeding volume (P=0.25), length of post-ostomy hospital stay (P=0.08), and time to first defecation after surgery (P=0.23). Compared to the control group, neonates in the OIC group had a shorter duration of parenteral nutrition (P=0.02), a shorter interval between stoma creation and closure surgeries (P=0.02), a shorter duration of stoma closure surgery (P<0.001), and fewer postoperative complications (P<0.001). The weight-for-age Z-score before the stoma closure surgery was better in the OIC group than the control group (P=0.01).

Conclusions: In this study, we found that OIC, as a treatment for neonatal intestinal obstruction, was effective in maintaining intestinal continuity, improving the nutritional status of neonates, and shortening the interval between the stoma creation and closure surgeries.

用造口术连续治疗新生儿肠梗阻:一项单中心比较研究。
背景:目前有多种手术方式可用于治疗新生儿肠梗阻,但对最佳方法尚未达成共识。本研究旨在评估连续性造口术(OIC)的疗效,为外科医生确定合适的手术方法提供参考:该研究对2019年6月至2024年2月期间住院的46名肠梗阻新生儿的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。研究中的肠道损伤类型包括闭锁、坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)、胎粪回肠炎和肠旋转。根据手术程序,患者被分为OIC组和对照组。比较两组患者的一般信息以及围手术期和术后并发症:结果:18 名患者接受了 OIC,28 名患者接受了双管或单管肠造口术。两组患者在一般资料、造口手术时间(P=0.66)、出血量(P=0.25)、造口术后住院时间(P=0.08)和术后首次排便时间(P=0.23)等方面差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,OIC 组新生儿接受肠外营养的时间更短(P=0.02),造口创建和关闭手术的间隔时间更短(P=0.02),造口关闭手术的时间更短(结论:OIC 组新生儿的肠外营养时间更短(P=0.02),造口创建和关闭手术的间隔时间更短(P=0.02):在这项研究中,我们发现 OIC 作为新生儿肠梗阻的一种治疗方法,在保持肠道连续性、改善新生儿营养状况以及缩短造口创建和关闭手术的间隔时间方面效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信