In silico aquatic toxicity prediction of chemicals toward Daphnia magna and fathead minnow using Monte Carlo approaches.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Shahram Lotfi, Shahin Ahmadi, Ali Azimi, Parvin Kumar
{"title":"<i>In silico</i> aquatic toxicity prediction of chemicals toward <i>Daphnia magna</i> and fathead minnow using Monte Carlo approaches.","authors":"Shahram Lotfi, Shahin Ahmadi, Ali Azimi, Parvin Kumar","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2024.2416226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fast-increasing use of chemicals led to large numbers of chemical compounds entering the aquatic environment, raising concerns about their potential effects on ecosystems. Therefore, assessment of the ecotoxicological features of organic compounds on aquatic organisms is very important. <i>Daphnia magna</i> and <i>Fathead minnow</i> are two aquatic species that are commonly tested as standard test organisms for aquatic risk assessment and are typically chosen as the biological model for the ecotoxicology investigations of chemical pollutants. Herein, global quantitative structure-toxicity relationship (QSTR) models have been developed to predict the toxicity (pEC(LC)50) of a large dataset comprising 2106 chemicals toward <i>Daphnia magna</i> and <i>Fathead minnow</i>. The optimal descriptor of correlation weights (DCWs) is calculated using the notation of simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) and is used to construct QSTR models. Three target functions, TF<sub>1</sub>, TF<sub>2</sub>, and TF<sub>3</sub> are utilized to generate 12 QSTR models from four splits, and their statistical characteristics are also compared. The designed QSTR models are validated using both internal and external validation criteria and are found to be reliable, robust, and excellently predictive. Among the models, those generated using the TF<sub>3</sub> demonstrate the best statistical quality with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0.9467 to 0.9607, <i>Q</i><sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0.9462 to 0.9603 and RMSE values ranging from 0.3764 to 0.4413 for the validation set. The applicability domain and the mechanistic interpretations of generated models were also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2416226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fast-increasing use of chemicals led to large numbers of chemical compounds entering the aquatic environment, raising concerns about their potential effects on ecosystems. Therefore, assessment of the ecotoxicological features of organic compounds on aquatic organisms is very important. Daphnia magna and Fathead minnow are two aquatic species that are commonly tested as standard test organisms for aquatic risk assessment and are typically chosen as the biological model for the ecotoxicology investigations of chemical pollutants. Herein, global quantitative structure-toxicity relationship (QSTR) models have been developed to predict the toxicity (pEC(LC)50) of a large dataset comprising 2106 chemicals toward Daphnia magna and Fathead minnow. The optimal descriptor of correlation weights (DCWs) is calculated using the notation of simplified molecular input line entry system (SMILES) and is used to construct QSTR models. Three target functions, TF1, TF2, and TF3 are utilized to generate 12 QSTR models from four splits, and their statistical characteristics are also compared. The designed QSTR models are validated using both internal and external validation criteria and are found to be reliable, robust, and excellently predictive. Among the models, those generated using the TF3 demonstrate the best statistical quality with R2 values ranging from 0.9467 to 0.9607, Q2 values ranging from 0.9462 to 0.9603 and RMSE values ranging from 0.3764 to 0.4413 for the validation set. The applicability domain and the mechanistic interpretations of generated models were also discussed.

使用蒙特卡洛方法对大型蚤和黑头鲦的化学物质水生毒性进行硅学预测。
化学品使用的快速增长导致大量化合物进入水生环境,引起人们对其对生态系统潜在影响的关注。因此,评估有机化合物对水生生物的生态毒理学特征非常重要。大型水蚤和胖头鱼是水生风险评估中常用的两种标准测试生物,通常被选为化学污染物生态毒理学研究的生物模型。本文建立了全局定量结构-毒性关系(QSTR)模型,以预测由 2106 种化学物质组成的大型数据集对大型水蚤和黑头呆鱼的毒性(pEC(LC)50)。使用简化分子输入-行输入系统(SMILES)的符号计算出最佳相关权重描述符(DCW),并将其用于构建 QSTR 模型。利用三个目标函数(TF1、TF2 和 TF3)从四个拆分中生成了 12 个 QSTR 模型,并比较了它们的统计特征。使用内部和外部验证标准对所设计的 QSTR 模型进行了验证,结果表明这些模型可靠、稳健且具有出色的预测性。在这些模型中,使用 TF3 生成的模型的统计质量最好,验证集的 R2 值在 0.9467 到 0.9607 之间,Q2 值在 0.9462 到 0.9603 之间,RMSE 值在 0.3764 到 0.4413 之间。此外,还讨论了生成模型的适用领域和机理解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信