Factors Associated with Early Postoperative Pain after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-03-11 eCollection Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0272
Norihiko Takegami, Koji Akeda, Koki Kawaguchi, Tatsuhiko Fujiwara, Akihiro Sudo
{"title":"Factors Associated with Early Postoperative Pain after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.","authors":"Norihiko Takegami, Koji Akeda, Koki Kawaguchi, Tatsuhiko Fujiwara, Akihiro Sudo","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite that lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgery, some patients complain of severe site pain immediately after the surgery. This study aimed to explore the extent of perioperative pain after LLIF, compare the degree of perioperative pain after LLIF with that after other surgical procedures, and evaluate the factors associated with severe pain in the early postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 93 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries for lumbar degenerative diseases were analyzed. The patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical procedure: Group L, LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS); Group P, posterolateral fusion (PLF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); and Group D, posterior decompression (fenestration). The extent of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and from postoperative days 1 to 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS score for postoperative pain decreased in a time-dependent manner in all three groups (P<0.01). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the VAS in Group L was significantly higher than that in Group D (P<0.01). Time point analysis revealed that the VAS scores from postoperative days 1 to 9 in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group D (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the VAS scores of postoperative pain between Groups L and P on all postoperative days. The VAS score for early postoperative pain in Group L was significantly correlated with the change in disc height index (P<0.05, r=0.43) and tended to be associated with the grade of preoperative disc degeneration and the VAS score of preoperative low back pain (P=0.076-0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the factors associated with pain during the early postoperative period of LLIF. Although LLIF is a minimally invasive surgery, severe pain may develop in patients with significant preoperative disc degeneration or following spinal correction surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite that lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgery, some patients complain of severe site pain immediately after the surgery. This study aimed to explore the extent of perioperative pain after LLIF, compare the degree of perioperative pain after LLIF with that after other surgical procedures, and evaluate the factors associated with severe pain in the early postoperative period.

Methods: In this study, 93 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries for lumbar degenerative diseases were analyzed. The patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical procedure: Group L, LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS); Group P, posterolateral fusion (PLF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); and Group D, posterior decompression (fenestration). The extent of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and from postoperative days 1 to 14.

Results: The VAS score for postoperative pain decreased in a time-dependent manner in all three groups (P<0.01). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the VAS in Group L was significantly higher than that in Group D (P<0.01). Time point analysis revealed that the VAS scores from postoperative days 1 to 9 in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group D (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the VAS scores of postoperative pain between Groups L and P on all postoperative days. The VAS score for early postoperative pain in Group L was significantly correlated with the change in disc height index (P<0.05, r=0.43) and tended to be associated with the grade of preoperative disc degeneration and the VAS score of preoperative low back pain (P=0.076-0.19).

Conclusions: This study is the first to evaluate the factors associated with pain during the early postoperative period of LLIF. Although LLIF is a minimally invasive surgery, severe pain may develop in patients with significant preoperative disc degeneration or following spinal correction surgery.

腰椎外侧椎体间融合术后早期疼痛的相关因素
导言:尽管侧腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)是一种微创手术,但一些患者在术后立即抱怨手术部位疼痛剧烈。本研究旨在探讨 LLIF 术后围手术期疼痛的程度,比较 LLIF 术后围手术期疼痛与其他外科手术后疼痛的程度,并评估术后早期剧烈疼痛的相关因素:本研究分析了 93 名因腰椎退行性疾病而接受腰椎手术的患者。根据手术方法将患者分为三组:L组,经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)LLIF;P组,后外侧融合术(PLF)或后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF);D组,后路减压术(椎间孔穿刺术)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对术前和术后第 1 至 14 天的腰痛程度进行评估:结果:三组患者术后疼痛的 VAS 评分均呈时间依赖性下降(PC组):本研究首次评估了 LLIF 术后早期疼痛的相关因素。虽然 LLIF 是一种微创手术,但术前有明显椎间盘退变或脊柱矫正手术后的患者可能会出现剧烈疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信