Xin Zhang, Jixiong Xie, Ting Su, Jiongtao Zhu, Dongmei Xia, Hairong Zheng, Dong Liang, Yongshuai Ge
{"title":"Study on the impact of bowtie filter on photon-counting CT imaging.","authors":"Xin Zhang, Jixiong Xie, Ting Su, Jiongtao Zhu, Dongmei Xia, Hairong Zheng, Dong Liang, Yongshuai Ge","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the bowtie filter on the image quality of the photon-counting detector (PCD) based CT imaging.<i>Approach.</i>Numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the impact of bowtie filters on image uniformity using two water phantoms, with tube potentials ranging from 60 to 140 kVp with a step of 5 kVp. Subsequently, benchtop PCD-CT imaging experiments were performed to verify the observations from the numerical simulations. Additionally, various correction methods were validated through these experiments.<i>Main results.</i>It was found that the use of a bowtie filter significantly alters the uniformity of PCD-CT images, depending on the size of the object and the x-ray spectrum. Two notable effects were observed: the capping effect and the flattening effect. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the conventional beam hardening correction method could effectively mitigate such non-uniformity in PCD-CT images, provided that dedicated calibration parameters were used.<i>Significance.</i>It was demonstrated that the incorporation of a bowtie filter results in varied image artifacts in PCD-CT imaging under different conditions. Certain image correction methods can effectively mitigate and reduce these artifacts, thereby enhancing the overall quality of PCD-CT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the bowtie filter on the image quality of the photon-counting detector (PCD) based CT imaging.Approach.Numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the impact of bowtie filters on image uniformity using two water phantoms, with tube potentials ranging from 60 to 140 kVp with a step of 5 kVp. Subsequently, benchtop PCD-CT imaging experiments were performed to verify the observations from the numerical simulations. Additionally, various correction methods were validated through these experiments.Main results.It was found that the use of a bowtie filter significantly alters the uniformity of PCD-CT images, depending on the size of the object and the x-ray spectrum. Two notable effects were observed: the capping effect and the flattening effect. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the conventional beam hardening correction method could effectively mitigate such non-uniformity in PCD-CT images, provided that dedicated calibration parameters were used.Significance.It was demonstrated that the incorporation of a bowtie filter results in varied image artifacts in PCD-CT imaging under different conditions. Certain image correction methods can effectively mitigate and reduce these artifacts, thereby enhancing the overall quality of PCD-CT images.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry