Explainable AI for automated respiratory misalignment detection in PET/CT imaging.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yazdan Salimi, Zahra Mansouri, Mehdi Amini, Ismini Mainta, Habib Zaidi
{"title":"Explainable AI for automated respiratory misalignment detection in PET/CT imaging.","authors":"Yazdan Salimi, Zahra Mansouri, Mehdi Amini, Ismini Mainta, Habib Zaidi","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad8857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose.</i>Positron emission tomography (PET) image quality can be affected by artifacts emanating from PET, computed tomography (CT), or artifacts due to misalignment between PET and CT images. Automated detection of misalignment artifacts can be helpful both in data curation and in facilitating clinical workflow. This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning approach to detect misalignment artifacts in PET/CT imaging.<i>Approach.</i>This study included 1216 PET/CT images. All images were visualized and images with respiratory misalignment artifact (RMA) detected. Using previously trained models, four organs including the lungs, liver, spleen, and heart were delineated on PET and CT images separately. Data were randomly split into cross-validation (80%) and test set (20%), then two segmentations performed on PET and CT images were compared and the comparison metrics used as predictors for a random forest framework in a 10-fold scheme on cross-validation data. The trained models were tested on 20% test set data. The model's performance was calculated in terms of specificity, sensitivity, F1-Score and area under the curve (AUC).<i>Main results.</i>Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.82, 0.85, and 0.91 were achieved in ten-fold data split. F1_score, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 84.5 vs 82.3, 83.9 vs 83.8, 87.7 vs 83.5, and 93.2 vs 90.1 were achieved for cross-validation vs test set, respectively. The liver and lung were the most important organs selected after feature selection.<i>Significance.</i>We developed an automated pipeline to segment four organs from PET and CT images separately and used the match between these segmentations to decide about the presence of misalignment artifact. This methodology may follow the same logic as a reader detecting misalignment through comparing the contours of organs on PET and CT images. The proposed method can be used to clean large datasets or integrated into a clinical scanner to indicate artifactual cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose.Positron emission tomography (PET) image quality can be affected by artifacts emanating from PET, computed tomography (CT), or artifacts due to misalignment between PET and CT images. Automated detection of misalignment artifacts can be helpful both in data curation and in facilitating clinical workflow. This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning approach to detect misalignment artifacts in PET/CT imaging.Approach.This study included 1216 PET/CT images. All images were visualized and images with respiratory misalignment artifact (RMA) detected. Using previously trained models, four organs including the lungs, liver, spleen, and heart were delineated on PET and CT images separately. Data were randomly split into cross-validation (80%) and test set (20%), then two segmentations performed on PET and CT images were compared and the comparison metrics used as predictors for a random forest framework in a 10-fold scheme on cross-validation data. The trained models were tested on 20% test set data. The model's performance was calculated in terms of specificity, sensitivity, F1-Score and area under the curve (AUC).Main results.Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.82, 0.85, and 0.91 were achieved in ten-fold data split. F1_score, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 84.5 vs 82.3, 83.9 vs 83.8, 87.7 vs 83.5, and 93.2 vs 90.1 were achieved for cross-validation vs test set, respectively. The liver and lung were the most important organs selected after feature selection.Significance.We developed an automated pipeline to segment four organs from PET and CT images separately and used the match between these segmentations to decide about the presence of misalignment artifact. This methodology may follow the same logic as a reader detecting misalignment through comparing the contours of organs on PET and CT images. The proposed method can be used to clean large datasets or integrated into a clinical scanner to indicate artifactual cases.

用于 PET/CT 成像中自动呼吸错位检测的可解释人工智能。
目的:正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET)图像质量可能会受到 PET、CT 产生的伪影或 PET 和 CT 图像错位造成的伪影的影响。自动检测错位伪影有助于数据整理和简化临床工作流程。本研究旨在开发一种可解释的机器学习方法来检测 PET/CT 成像中的错位伪影。这项研究包括 1216 幅 PET/CT 图像。对所有图像进行可视化处理,并检测出存在呼吸错位伪影(RMA)的图像。利用先前训练好的模型,分别在 PET 和 CT 图像上划分出肺、肝、脾和心脏等四个器官。数据被随机分成交叉验证集(80%)和测试集(20%),然后对 PET 和 CT 图像上进行的两次分割进行比较,并将比较指标用作随机森林框架的预测因子,在交叉验证数据上采用 10 倍方案。训练好的模型在 20% 的测试集数据上进行测试。根据特异性、灵敏度、F1-分数和曲线下面积(AUC)计算模型的性能。在十倍数据拆分中,灵敏度、特异性和 AUC 分别达到了 0.82、0.85 和 0.91。交叉验证集与测试集的 F1_score、灵敏度、特异性和 AUC 分别为 84.5 vs 82.3、83.9 vs 83.8、87.7 vs 83.5 和 93.2 vs 90.1。肝脏和肺是特征选择后选出的最重要器官。我们开发了一个自动管道,分别从 PET 和 CT 图像中分割出四个器官,并利用这些分割之间的匹配度来判断是否存在错位伪影。这种方法与读者通过比较 PET 和 CT 图像上器官的轮廓来检测错位的逻辑相同。所提出的方法可用于清理大型数据集,或集成到临床扫描仪中以指示伪影情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信