Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1111/papr.13426
Alessandro Dario, Luca Ferlendis, Bianca Bossi, Davide Locatelli
{"title":"Preventing technique-related complications in spinal cord stimulation trials: The Dural Substitute Confetti technique. A retrospective monocentric analysis.","authors":"Alessandro Dario, Luca Ferlendis, Bianca Bossi, Davide Locatelli","doi":"10.1111/papr.13426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, employing screening trials to identify suitable candidates before implantation. However, complications arising from both technique and medical factors present challenges to this practice. This study introduces the Dural Substitute Confetti technique, which addresses technique-related complications during SCS implantation by preventing scar-induced lead migration or breakage and reducing operating times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis on 174 patients treated with SCS trials from 2017 to 2022 at our institution. Of these, 85.1% proceeded to permanent implantation. During trial surgery, synthetic dural substitutes (DS) were used to protect leads, which remained connected to an external pulse generator (EPG) for 20-28 days (mean 21.4 days). Utilizing the DS Confetti technique, leads were easily dissected from the DS during the second surgery and connected to an internal pulse generator (IPG). We compared complications and surgical times before and after the introduction of this technique in 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the complete SCS trial, patients experienced over 50% pain relief, with an implant-to-trial ratio of 85.1% and a mean follow-up of 52 months. No technique-related complications occurred during the trial period post-2017, while the pre-2017 group had a 3.9% lead migration rate due to scarring, necessitating re-implantation. The average surgery duration decreased from 54 min pre-2017 to 32 min post-2017. Medical-related complications included infections (2.1%) and wound dehiscence (1.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DS Confetti technique prevents scar adhesion formation during screening trials, thereby facilitating and expediting the definitive SCS implantation. Additionally, it may also reduce the risk of lead migration and iatrogenic damage, potentially lowering technique-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, employing screening trials to identify suitable candidates before implantation. However, complications arising from both technique and medical factors present challenges to this practice. This study introduces the Dural Substitute Confetti technique, which addresses technique-related complications during SCS implantation by preventing scar-induced lead migration or breakage and reducing operating times.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 174 patients treated with SCS trials from 2017 to 2022 at our institution. Of these, 85.1% proceeded to permanent implantation. During trial surgery, synthetic dural substitutes (DS) were used to protect leads, which remained connected to an external pulse generator (EPG) for 20-28 days (mean 21.4 days). Utilizing the DS Confetti technique, leads were easily dissected from the DS during the second surgery and connected to an internal pulse generator (IPG). We compared complications and surgical times before and after the introduction of this technique in 2017.

Results: Following the complete SCS trial, patients experienced over 50% pain relief, with an implant-to-trial ratio of 85.1% and a mean follow-up of 52 months. No technique-related complications occurred during the trial period post-2017, while the pre-2017 group had a 3.9% lead migration rate due to scarring, necessitating re-implantation. The average surgery duration decreased from 54 min pre-2017 to 32 min post-2017. Medical-related complications included infections (2.1%) and wound dehiscence (1.3%).

Conclusions: The DS Confetti technique prevents scar adhesion formation during screening trials, thereby facilitating and expediting the definitive SCS implantation. Additionally, it may also reduce the risk of lead migration and iatrogenic damage, potentially lowering technique-related complications.

预防脊髓刺激试验中与技术相关的并发症:硬脑膜替代 Confetti 技术。回顾性单中心分析。
背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种治疗慢性疼痛的成熟疗法,通过筛选试验来确定植入前的合适人选。然而,由技术和医疗因素引起的并发症给这一疗法带来了挑战。本研究介绍了硬脑膜替代物Confetti技术,该技术通过防止疤痕引起的导线移位或断裂并缩短手术时间,解决了SCS植入过程中与技术相关的并发症:我们对本机构 2017 年至 2022 年期间接受 SCS 试验治疗的 174 名患者进行了回顾性分析。其中,85.1%的患者进行了永久植入。试验手术期间,使用合成硬脑膜替代物(DS)保护导线,导线与外部脉冲发生器(EPG)保持连接 20-28 天(平均 21.4 天)。利用 DS Confetti 技术,在第二次手术中可以轻松地将导线从 DS 上剥离,并连接到内部脉冲发生器 (IPG)。我们比较了 2017 年引入该技术前后的并发症和手术时间:完整的 SCS 试验后,患者的疼痛缓解率超过 50%,植入与试验比率为 85.1%,平均随访时间为 52 个月。2017年后的试验期间未发生与技术相关的并发症,而2017年之前的试验组因瘢痕导致的导线移位率为3.9%,需要重新植入。平均手术时间从 2017 年前的 54 分钟缩短至 2017 年后的 32 分钟。医疗相关并发症包括感染(2.1%)和伤口裂开(1.3%):DS Confetti 技术可防止筛查试验中瘢痕粘连的形成,从而促进并加快最终 SCS 植入。结论:DS Confetti 技术可防止筛查试验中瘢痕粘连的形成,从而促进并加快最终的 SCS 植入,此外,它还可降低导线移位和先天性损伤的风险,从而降低与技术相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信